- Home
- Search
- Isaac Speer
- All Reviews
Isaac Speer
AD
Based on 48 Users
I was not looking forward to this class at all as it's learning about old theorists and reading their boring, dense work. However, Professor Speer made this class super interesting, was able to break down the content into understandable terms and it was actually a fun class. Some of the concepts are definitely hard to grasp but it is important to do so. I really do recommend going to office hours for Professor Speer and/or your TA to discuss the readings and ask any clarifying questions. I know office hours can be scary, but for this class especially it is so important in order to really understand the necessary material unless you are some genius who can easily read and comprehend the works of Marx, Durkheim, and Weber.
After taking this class, I know I am very comfortable with the way Speer lectures. I am so excited to take more classes taught by Professor Speer.
I honestly really appreciate the minimal stuff he has on the slides because he goes in depth explaining them. So the best way I know for me to take notes for this class is typing what is on the slides and possibly under whatever statement, I also type what he says. I am able to do this during the live lecture, but if you cannot keep up, his lectures are also recorded!
As for his assignments, I believe they are fair and straight forward. If done correctly, they are helpful in possible essays, because you would then have citations for explaining certain concepts. However, if you are not sure and still do the assignment, this quarter and usually these assignments are graded on completion anyways. Therefore, in discussion, we would usually discuss the questions or concepts in class.
They changed Soc 110 to Sociohistorical Methods, a methods course, and this was the first time it had been taught in this way. It was a lot of work and prof Speer was still working out the best way to teach the class. There was a midterm, a final, weekly readings of papers that used historical methods (sometimes really dense/boring), homeworks about the readings that were only graded on completeness, a final paper, and discussion section was worth 10% of the grade. You got to choose your topic for the final paper which was good. Overall I enjoyed the class and thought Speer was really great and lectures were engaging. It's a good way to get the methods requirement out of the way especially since there's no math.
This is my second time having Speer. His lectures are a bit dry, but he does really make the effort to ensure students understand what he is trying to teach. He's a nice, helpful professor. The lectures are very consistent. The tests were not overly difficult, but not exactly the best way to test theory (in my opinion). The readings were manageable, the homework was helpful in understanding the readings, and the structure of this class was consistent which was nice. I'd recommend Speer to other students, but I didn't find this class as engaging and interesting as I think it could have been. I loved 101 and was very excited for 102, but it was a bit boring.
Speer is just a great professor! He always tries to make concepts/readings as understandable as possible. The workload is really manageable and it is not too much. As long as you the readings and take notes you can definitely get an A. Also, Speer is a very nice and approachable professor who goes above and beyond to help students understand the materials!
I would definitely take another class with him.
I find that Speer is not the worse professor to have, with lectures that are easy to follow. However, the style of having a midterm, 8-page paper due in Week 9 followed by a final in Week 10 did not make sense to me. I wish that instead of a final we only had the paper or vice versa. The format of the midterm and final is divided into two parts: multiple choice then short essay answers (about two.) The multiple-choice questions felt unnecessarily tricky, and as someone who did the readings and took notes, I was annoyed that several responses felt like trick questions. On that note, there are multiple lengthy readings required with weekly homework assignments (answering about 6-8 questions on the week's reading with a 150-word response to each.) I did not strictly adhere to the word count and was not penalized for this, but this depends on the TA. I think what made the class manageable to me is having a really good TA to break down the concepts, so I have to admit I'm hesitant to take another class with Speer without guaranteed additional help. (Approaching him for questions can be intimidating.)
This man is heaven-sent. THE BEST PROFESSOR!!! I'm not even exaggerating. He is super helpful and accommodating.
Yes, there is a multiple choice and short essay part (for both midterm and final) but they're super easy if you do the homework. Also, there's a final paper (usually with a prompt but students have somewhat free range to talk about what they want as long as it follows the assignment) which is easy to do if you do the work. This is my fourth time taking him because he is just that good.
With the protests going on campus, he was super understanding of the stress and severity of the situation. I don't want to say too much about how accommodating he was because I wanna gatekeep but also because I don't want people to take advantage of his kindness (call me a teacher's pet I don't care).
I just can't truly express how much of an amazing human being he is. Aside from academia (which, he is also really good at), he has a heart of gold.
Speer is the worst instructor I’ve had in my academic career. His lecture was extremely uninformative and misleading. His class material is outdated and lectures are extremely hard to follow with how monotone he is. Speer gets very off topic and side tracks to his political beliefs that he tries to impose on students, rather than focusing on teaching. I remember him comparing Trump to Hitler, to name one incident. I strongly encourage everyone to stay away from this class!
This was an enjoyable class to take. Professor Speer is patient, accommodating, and presents the material in a clear manner. His assignments are pretty writing heavy which is expected when it comes to Sociology classes, but the workload is manageable. He is also rather opinionated which makes his lectures interesting and funny. I would try and take one of his classes if you can.
I was not looking forward to this class at all as it's learning about old theorists and reading their boring, dense work. However, Professor Speer made this class super interesting, was able to break down the content into understandable terms and it was actually a fun class. Some of the concepts are definitely hard to grasp but it is important to do so. I really do recommend going to office hours for Professor Speer and/or your TA to discuss the readings and ask any clarifying questions. I know office hours can be scary, but for this class especially it is so important in order to really understand the necessary material unless you are some genius who can easily read and comprehend the works of Marx, Durkheim, and Weber.
After taking this class, I know I am very comfortable with the way Speer lectures. I am so excited to take more classes taught by Professor Speer.
I honestly really appreciate the minimal stuff he has on the slides because he goes in depth explaining them. So the best way I know for me to take notes for this class is typing what is on the slides and possibly under whatever statement, I also type what he says. I am able to do this during the live lecture, but if you cannot keep up, his lectures are also recorded!
As for his assignments, I believe they are fair and straight forward. If done correctly, they are helpful in possible essays, because you would then have citations for explaining certain concepts. However, if you are not sure and still do the assignment, this quarter and usually these assignments are graded on completion anyways. Therefore, in discussion, we would usually discuss the questions or concepts in class.
They changed Soc 110 to Sociohistorical Methods, a methods course, and this was the first time it had been taught in this way. It was a lot of work and prof Speer was still working out the best way to teach the class. There was a midterm, a final, weekly readings of papers that used historical methods (sometimes really dense/boring), homeworks about the readings that were only graded on completeness, a final paper, and discussion section was worth 10% of the grade. You got to choose your topic for the final paper which was good. Overall I enjoyed the class and thought Speer was really great and lectures were engaging. It's a good way to get the methods requirement out of the way especially since there's no math.
This is my second time having Speer. His lectures are a bit dry, but he does really make the effort to ensure students understand what he is trying to teach. He's a nice, helpful professor. The lectures are very consistent. The tests were not overly difficult, but not exactly the best way to test theory (in my opinion). The readings were manageable, the homework was helpful in understanding the readings, and the structure of this class was consistent which was nice. I'd recommend Speer to other students, but I didn't find this class as engaging and interesting as I think it could have been. I loved 101 and was very excited for 102, but it was a bit boring.
Speer is just a great professor! He always tries to make concepts/readings as understandable as possible. The workload is really manageable and it is not too much. As long as you the readings and take notes you can definitely get an A. Also, Speer is a very nice and approachable professor who goes above and beyond to help students understand the materials!
I would definitely take another class with him.
I find that Speer is not the worse professor to have, with lectures that are easy to follow. However, the style of having a midterm, 8-page paper due in Week 9 followed by a final in Week 10 did not make sense to me. I wish that instead of a final we only had the paper or vice versa. The format of the midterm and final is divided into two parts: multiple choice then short essay answers (about two.) The multiple-choice questions felt unnecessarily tricky, and as someone who did the readings and took notes, I was annoyed that several responses felt like trick questions. On that note, there are multiple lengthy readings required with weekly homework assignments (answering about 6-8 questions on the week's reading with a 150-word response to each.) I did not strictly adhere to the word count and was not penalized for this, but this depends on the TA. I think what made the class manageable to me is having a really good TA to break down the concepts, so I have to admit I'm hesitant to take another class with Speer without guaranteed additional help. (Approaching him for questions can be intimidating.)
This man is heaven-sent. THE BEST PROFESSOR!!! I'm not even exaggerating. He is super helpful and accommodating.
Yes, there is a multiple choice and short essay part (for both midterm and final) but they're super easy if you do the homework. Also, there's a final paper (usually with a prompt but students have somewhat free range to talk about what they want as long as it follows the assignment) which is easy to do if you do the work. This is my fourth time taking him because he is just that good.
With the protests going on campus, he was super understanding of the stress and severity of the situation. I don't want to say too much about how accommodating he was because I wanna gatekeep but also because I don't want people to take advantage of his kindness (call me a teacher's pet I don't care).
I just can't truly express how much of an amazing human being he is. Aside from academia (which, he is also really good at), he has a heart of gold.
Speer is the worst instructor I’ve had in my academic career. His lecture was extremely uninformative and misleading. His class material is outdated and lectures are extremely hard to follow with how monotone he is. Speer gets very off topic and side tracks to his political beliefs that he tries to impose on students, rather than focusing on teaching. I remember him comparing Trump to Hitler, to name one incident. I strongly encourage everyone to stay away from this class!
This was an enjoyable class to take. Professor Speer is patient, accommodating, and presents the material in a clear manner. His assignments are pretty writing heavy which is expected when it comes to Sociology classes, but the workload is manageable. He is also rather opinionated which makes his lectures interesting and funny. I would try and take one of his classes if you can.