Professor

X Wang

AD
2.5
Overall Ratings
Based on 10 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 2.4 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 2.5 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 2.5 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (10)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
March 17, 2014
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

I frankly think that Professor Wang is ineffective as a lecturer. While he is a nice person, his persona while lecturing is uninspiring and not engaging. He will write plenty of equations on the board, but his explanations drone on and on. Fortunately, our TA this quarter was excellent and explained the material well and concisely.

Perhaps the curriculum of this course is the problem. While it is called "Mathematics for Engineers," we see very little math applied to actual engineering problems, or any problems for that matter. The homework revolves around solving equations, and that's about it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
March 29, 2014
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

Frankly, we hardly learned anything that wasn't already covered in Math 33B. I'm not sure if that's an issue with the course materials or just this professor's way of teaching. Regardless, lectures were dry and boring, and the midterms were so easy that they don't even meaningfully distinguish good students. Disappointed with this class overall.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MECH&AE 182A
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 17, 2014

I frankly think that Professor Wang is ineffective as a lecturer. While he is a nice person, his persona while lecturing is uninspiring and not engaging. He will write plenty of equations on the board, but his explanations drone on and on. Fortunately, our TA this quarter was excellent and explained the material well and concisely.

Perhaps the curriculum of this course is the problem. While it is called "Mathematics for Engineers," we see very little math applied to actual engineering problems, or any problems for that matter. The homework revolves around solving equations, and that's about it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MECH&AE 182A
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 29, 2014

Frankly, we hardly learned anything that wasn't already covered in Math 33B. I'm not sure if that's an issue with the course materials or just this professor's way of teaching. Regardless, lectures were dry and boring, and the midterms were so easy that they don't even meaningfully distinguish good students. Disappointed with this class overall.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!