- Home
- Search
- Wei-hsin Yu
- SOCIOL 20
AD
Based on 7 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides
- Needs Textbook
- Useful Textbooks
- Participation Matters
- Is Podcasted
- Appropriately Priced Materials
- Tough Tests
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
One of the worst professors/TA's I've EVER had. Lectures are boring and long and not engaging at all. You basically have to teach yourself everything. She gives weekly quizzes that are about 22 questions but only gives 20 minutes for you to complete them, and the questions are very long and complicated. For our discussion section, my TA was not helpful at all. The TA or the professor does not grade your essays. They are graded by some random "grader" who is soooooo harsh and will take points off for absolutely anything. You meet once a week for your discussion section, but you do not review any of the week's readings. You are put into breakout groups and are assigned some stupid group work that you don't really learn anything from. I had to make this class a Pass/No pass because there was no way I would get anything higher than a C. considering this course is a lower division course, it is much harder than it needs to be, and if you need to take this course and you have other options available please do yourself a favor and don't take this course with this professor.
I know it is hard to make a lecture engaging and fun especially during the covid pandemic; however, this class is really boring that the lecture is basically just the repeat of the material from the textbook. And that the lectures are about more than an hour long, with 2 to 3 lecture videos per week. Every week we will need to attend the discussion section with TA and basically, we were just there to complete the assigned group memo by being assigned to different breakout rooms. You will never know which group members you'll get. I had some bad times during the groupwork where everyone just mute and turn off their camera and I ended up doing the work for the entire group. I feel like this is something the course has to be improved so that everyone deserves their grades based on the efforts they made. Other assignments include mini projects (2 pages), weekly lecture discussion response, and chapter quizzes. I would say the chapter quizzes are very hard especially if you are a slow reader. There were usually 20 questions and given only 25 minutes to complete, which is kind of challenging to me especially since many of them were scenario-based. Overall, this class is doable and the grading was ok...but I wouldn't say I have enjoyed it.
This class is difficult in the COVID-19 environment, especially because your TA is not always the one to grade your assignments. However, the professor was willing to make multiple accomodations for grading that seemed too harsh and provide grade bumps for the midterm. It is just a typical research methods class that is less-enjoyable over the internet
Honestly, I should have listened to the previous reviews for this professor and never taken this course with her. The lectures are long, boring, and unclear. You practically have to teach yourself the material because they are so unhelpful. The professor expects way too much for this class, especially considering that it's an intro course. The weekly quizzes are unreasonably timed. The mini-projects are graded out of 95, although your grade is still out of 100. Essentially, you miss 5 points right off the bat. For example, if you miss 6 points on the mini-project, that's an 89/100. Dumb, I know. I could probably keep going about how much I regret taking this class, but you get the memo. Spare yourselves and choose any other professor for the course. She will practically ruin any bit of passion or interest you had in Sociology.
Take these reviews with a grain of salt. This class was not that bad and I finished with an A+. This class consisted of weekly chapter quizzes, weekly discussion posts, weekly "mini projects" in discussion, a midterm, and a final research proposal. While the lectures could get pretty boring (they were recorded and posted weekly), as long as you read from the textbook and take notes on that you will do fine on the weekly quizzes. The weekly quizzes are more conceptual based and not many of the answers can be found directly in the textbook (she will give scenarios and ask you to apply concepts).
The only real complaint I have about this class are the mini projects. During discussion every week we would either work independently on a mini project which was due 3 days after discussion or work in a breakout room together with about 4-5 other students on a project. I found these group projects highly frustrating as I always ended up being the only person working on the project. You only had the hour of discussion to complete it and I often found myself doing the whole thing (it's impossible to get people to participate who turn their camera/mic off on zoom). These were graded fairly, but I guess there was one TA who graded really harsh (I think his name was Zep). The midterm was fine, it was basically a longer version of the weekly quizzes. The research proposal was very easy for me because I was taking a class in which I had to conduct a research project so I was already familiar with it. Furthermore, it's only like 5 pages and its only a proposal so you don't actually have to conduct any research.
At the end of the quarter the professor dropped our lowest quiz score but only because a large group of students sent emails to complain to her about their grades.
If you put in the work and take notes you will be fine in this class.
One of the worst professors/TA's I've EVER had. Lectures are boring and long and not engaging at all. You basically have to teach yourself everything. She gives weekly quizzes that are about 22 questions but only gives 20 minutes for you to complete them, and the questions are very long and complicated. For our discussion section, my TA was not helpful at all. The TA or the professor does not grade your essays. They are graded by some random "grader" who is soooooo harsh and will take points off for absolutely anything. You meet once a week for your discussion section, but you do not review any of the week's readings. You are put into breakout groups and are assigned some stupid group work that you don't really learn anything from. I had to make this class a Pass/No pass because there was no way I would get anything higher than a C. considering this course is a lower division course, it is much harder than it needs to be, and if you need to take this course and you have other options available please do yourself a favor and don't take this course with this professor.
I know it is hard to make a lecture engaging and fun especially during the covid pandemic; however, this class is really boring that the lecture is basically just the repeat of the material from the textbook. And that the lectures are about more than an hour long, with 2 to 3 lecture videos per week. Every week we will need to attend the discussion section with TA and basically, we were just there to complete the assigned group memo by being assigned to different breakout rooms. You will never know which group members you'll get. I had some bad times during the groupwork where everyone just mute and turn off their camera and I ended up doing the work for the entire group. I feel like this is something the course has to be improved so that everyone deserves their grades based on the efforts they made. Other assignments include mini projects (2 pages), weekly lecture discussion response, and chapter quizzes. I would say the chapter quizzes are very hard especially if you are a slow reader. There were usually 20 questions and given only 25 minutes to complete, which is kind of challenging to me especially since many of them were scenario-based. Overall, this class is doable and the grading was ok...but I wouldn't say I have enjoyed it.
This class is difficult in the COVID-19 environment, especially because your TA is not always the one to grade your assignments. However, the professor was willing to make multiple accomodations for grading that seemed too harsh and provide grade bumps for the midterm. It is just a typical research methods class that is less-enjoyable over the internet
Honestly, I should have listened to the previous reviews for this professor and never taken this course with her. The lectures are long, boring, and unclear. You practically have to teach yourself the material because they are so unhelpful. The professor expects way too much for this class, especially considering that it's an intro course. The weekly quizzes are unreasonably timed. The mini-projects are graded out of 95, although your grade is still out of 100. Essentially, you miss 5 points right off the bat. For example, if you miss 6 points on the mini-project, that's an 89/100. Dumb, I know. I could probably keep going about how much I regret taking this class, but you get the memo. Spare yourselves and choose any other professor for the course. She will practically ruin any bit of passion or interest you had in Sociology.
Take these reviews with a grain of salt. This class was not that bad and I finished with an A+. This class consisted of weekly chapter quizzes, weekly discussion posts, weekly "mini projects" in discussion, a midterm, and a final research proposal. While the lectures could get pretty boring (they were recorded and posted weekly), as long as you read from the textbook and take notes on that you will do fine on the weekly quizzes. The weekly quizzes are more conceptual based and not many of the answers can be found directly in the textbook (she will give scenarios and ask you to apply concepts).
The only real complaint I have about this class are the mini projects. During discussion every week we would either work independently on a mini project which was due 3 days after discussion or work in a breakout room together with about 4-5 other students on a project. I found these group projects highly frustrating as I always ended up being the only person working on the project. You only had the hour of discussion to complete it and I often found myself doing the whole thing (it's impossible to get people to participate who turn their camera/mic off on zoom). These were graded fairly, but I guess there was one TA who graded really harsh (I think his name was Zep). The midterm was fine, it was basically a longer version of the weekly quizzes. The research proposal was very easy for me because I was taking a class in which I had to conduct a research project so I was already familiar with it. Furthermore, it's only like 5 pages and its only a proposal so you don't actually have to conduct any research.
At the end of the quarter the professor dropped our lowest quiz score but only because a large group of students sent emails to complain to her about their grades.
If you put in the work and take notes you will be fine in this class.
Based on 7 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides (5)
- Needs Textbook (6)
- Useful Textbooks (5)
- Participation Matters (5)
- Is Podcasted (5)
- Appropriately Priced Materials (3)
- Tough Tests (4)