Vilma Ortiz
Department of General Education Clusters
AD
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 49 Users
Easiness 3.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.4 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Participation Matters
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
54.9%
45.7%
36.6%
27.4%
18.3%
9.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

38.8%
32.3%
25.9%
19.4%
12.9%
6.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

26.0%
21.7%
17.4%
13.0%
8.7%
4.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

22.2%
18.5%
14.8%
11.1%
7.4%
3.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

24.8%
20.7%
16.5%
12.4%
8.3%
4.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

32.3%
26.9%
21.5%
16.1%
10.8%
5.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

33.5%
27.9%
22.3%
16.8%
11.2%
5.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

26.4%
22.0%
17.6%
13.2%
8.8%
4.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

29.8%
24.9%
19.9%
14.9%
9.9%
5.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

26.3%
21.9%
17.5%
13.1%
8.8%
4.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

26.1%
21.8%
17.4%
13.1%
8.7%
4.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (41)

5 of 5
5 of 5
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 27, 2013

Professor Ortiz was one of my professors for my Interracial Dynamics cluster course, and to be frank, she was my least favorite lecturer. She is very knowledgeable, and she typically covered the topics of Mexican immigration, which I do believe she knew a lot about. Professor Ortiz was just very blunt, and didn't seem to really care about students' input at times. She would often cut students off when they were talking (it happened to me!) and she is very outspoken about her own view of things. She would allow some discussion during lecture, but would often get impatient when other students were discussing an idea and would hurriedly shush them so that she could get back to talking herself. She didn't come off as very welcoming and it made me timid to ever want to talk to her personally or ask her a question. She did keep the class's attention during her lectures, however, and made no hesitation in calling out students if they were talking during her lecture. She walks around a lot too, and likes to walk up the aisles. She reminded me of a hawk hunting its prey.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 27, 2013

Professor Ortiz was one of my professors for my Interracial Dynamics cluster course, and to be frank, she was my least favorite lecturer. She is very knowledgeable, and she typically covered the topics of Mexican immigration, which I do believe she knew a lot about. Professor Ortiz was just very blunt, and didn't seem to really care about students' input at times. She would often cut students off when they were talking (it happened to me!) and she is very outspoken about her own view of things. She would allow some discussion during lecture, but would often get impatient when other students were discussing an idea and would hurriedly shush them so that she could get back to talking herself. She didn't come off as very welcoming and it made me timid to ever want to talk to her personally or ask her a question. She did keep the class's attention during her lectures, however, and made no hesitation in calling out students if they were talking during her lecture. She walks around a lot too, and likes to walk up the aisles. She reminded me of a hawk hunting its prey.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
5 of 5
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 49 Users
Easiness 3.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.4 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (22)
  • Participation Matters
    (22)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!