Ugo Edu
Department of African American Studies
AD
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Engaging Lectures
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
31.7%
26.4%
21.1%
15.9%
10.6%
5.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A+
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 18, 2023

This class kind of sucks but it's so easy and the material was interesting. The workload was very manageable and the lectures were engaging, but they were primarily done by Jemima Pierre with a few from other AfAmer profs at UCLA. Basically nothing from Edu. Also, it is a week after the quarter ended and I still don't have a midterm grade. Students in all sections experienced this, and when we reached out to the professor, we never got a response. I personally emailed her several times and never received any correspondence back. My TA never introduced himself to the students (the class was fully async but one of the other TAs -- Nila Seelan was VERY on top of everything). The material was fascinating and I truly enjoyed completing assignments, but the professor was not good. I think it was worth taking purely due to the knowledge that I got from it, but none of that knowledge really came from the professor who was teaching it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A+
Dec. 18, 2023

This class kind of sucks but it's so easy and the material was interesting. The workload was very manageable and the lectures were engaging, but they were primarily done by Jemima Pierre with a few from other AfAmer profs at UCLA. Basically nothing from Edu. Also, it is a week after the quarter ended and I still don't have a midterm grade. Students in all sections experienced this, and when we reached out to the professor, we never got a response. I personally emailed her several times and never received any correspondence back. My TA never introduced himself to the students (the class was fully async but one of the other TAs -- Nila Seelan was VERY on top of everything). The material was fascinating and I truly enjoyed completing assignments, but the professor was not good. I think it was worth taking purely due to the knowledge that I got from it, but none of that knowledge really came from the professor who was teaching it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Engaging Lectures
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!