Theodore D Huters
Department of Portuguese
AD
3.7
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.3 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.5 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Sept. 26, 2006

HORRIBLE teacher!!!! His grading was biased in terms of writing style, not the content. I took a Travel Study course in Global Studies. All he graded was on if he liked the style of writing. Plus, his class structure and material was unorganized. He rarely covered the issues of Shanghai and Globalization but rather what he was interested in, and didn't even really teach. He more like lectured but that didnt mean i learned anything from hiim. I learned more from the books and the students, than from all his lectures combined! I learned NOTHING about Global Studies from him. Amazingly, the students seemed to know even more than him on the topic. His grading is also real harsh! He rarely gives out A's and is unfair about grading. My final project was "one of the better papers" as quoted by him. But, he ended up giving a B on it. I guess his good papers are always given B's. I would NOT recommend him at all.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Sept. 26, 2006

HORRIBLE teacher!!!! His grading was biased in terms of writing style, not the content. I took a Travel Study course in Global Studies. All he graded was on if he liked the style of writing. Plus, his class structure and material was unorganized. He rarely covered the issues of Shanghai and Globalization but rather what he was interested in, and didn't even really teach. He more like lectured but that didnt mean i learned anything from hiim. I learned more from the books and the students, than from all his lectures combined! I learned NOTHING about Global Studies from him. Amazingly, the students seemed to know even more than him on the topic. His grading is also real harsh! He rarely gives out A's and is unfair about grading. My final project was "one of the better papers" as quoted by him. But, he ended up giving a B on it. I guess his good papers are always given B's. I would NOT recommend him at all.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.7
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.3 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.5 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!