Tamara Kucherenko
Department of Mathematics
AD
3.2
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 1.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.7 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Oct. 23, 2008

32B is probably the hardest lower div math class. The class is very abstract in a sense, because it requires you to be able to visualize in 3D in order to do the problems. Integration is also not a very easy concept in calculus, so if you had problems with it in other calculus classes, this class will be hard. Kucherenko does have an accent, but I feel like she did a good job covering the material and trying to explain things the simplest way possible. IN the beginning she would do some proofs and go over the concept, then do examples. Her lectures are very organized. Her midterms were pretty hard, and her final was pretty hard too. She's definitely NOT an easy teacher... but if you practice from the book and review everything before the tests you should be ok. 32B is about twice as hard as 32A, and it does require you to get a solid grasp of the concepts and know what you're doing rather than just blindly doing problems. If you don't know what you're doing and why you're doing it, this class will make you suffer.

Final grade in class: A

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Oct. 23, 2008

32B is probably the hardest lower div math class. The class is very abstract in a sense, because it requires you to be able to visualize in 3D in order to do the problems. Integration is also not a very easy concept in calculus, so if you had problems with it in other calculus classes, this class will be hard. Kucherenko does have an accent, but I feel like she did a good job covering the material and trying to explain things the simplest way possible. IN the beginning she would do some proofs and go over the concept, then do examples. Her lectures are very organized. Her midterms were pretty hard, and her final was pretty hard too. She's definitely NOT an easy teacher... but if you practice from the book and review everything before the tests you should be ok. 32B is about twice as hard as 32A, and it does require you to get a solid grasp of the concepts and know what you're doing rather than just blindly doing problems. If you don't know what you're doing and why you're doing it, this class will make you suffer.

Final grade in class: A

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.2
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 1.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.7 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!