- Home
- Search
- Sudhakar Pamarti
- EC ENGR 10
AD
Based on 8 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
I really disliked Pamarti. Probably the worst professor I've ever had. Every time I see a picture of him I start reaching for the toilet paper to wipe the shit off my monit- oh wait that's Pamarti.
He's just the biggest asshole of all time. Here's a conversation I had with him:
Me: So why didn't I get any points for this question? My setup equations are correct, but I put the R in the numerator instead of the denominator.
P (interrupting loudly): Yes, your setup is correct. I can give you three points (out of 40) for that. Your answer is wrong though.
Me: My answer would be right if I put R in the denominator. Even with my wrong setup, though, all my followup algebra is correct.
P: That's true, but your answer isn't right. You just don't understand the fundamentals. You shouldn't even have done the math, I don't know why you did. You need to go back and learn the basics.
Me (somewhat confused): I was just trying to show my thought process.
P (interrupting again): Yes, but your thought process is wrong. I won't give points for wrong work, even if it's correct work.
And I'm just like ?????????????????? Fuck this guy
As far as a lecturer, Professor Pamarti was very effective, especially for an introductory circuits class. He was very clear and kept relating the circuit analysis back to the physics. His grading though was not particularly fair. He would take off full credit for not explaining things enough, even though his definition of enough seemed completely arbitrary. He also gives out very few As and A-s, but other then that his grading scale is pretty normal. His test were pretty tough, and they were even worse because they always had lots of errors. He didn't seem to spend much effort on making them readable and correct. Also, he was late getting the final grades in and did not seem to understand that that was not ok. It messed a lot of people up, and he didn't seem to care.
In short, he was a very good lecturer, but pretty bad at every other aspect of being a professor.
I really disliked Pamarti. Probably the worst professor I've ever had. Every time I see a picture of him I start reaching for the toilet paper to wipe the shit off my monit- oh wait that's Pamarti.
He's just the biggest asshole of all time. Here's a conversation I had with him:
Me: So why didn't I get any points for this question? My setup equations are correct, but I put the R in the numerator instead of the denominator.
P (interrupting loudly): Yes, your setup is correct. I can give you three points (out of 40) for that. Your answer is wrong though.
Me: My answer would be right if I put R in the denominator. Even with my wrong setup, though, all my followup algebra is correct.
P: That's true, but your answer isn't right. You just don't understand the fundamentals. You shouldn't even have done the math, I don't know why you did. You need to go back and learn the basics.
Me (somewhat confused): I was just trying to show my thought process.
P (interrupting again): Yes, but your thought process is wrong. I won't give points for wrong work, even if it's correct work.
And I'm just like ?????????????????? Fuck this guy
As far as a lecturer, Professor Pamarti was very effective, especially for an introductory circuits class. He was very clear and kept relating the circuit analysis back to the physics. His grading though was not particularly fair. He would take off full credit for not explaining things enough, even though his definition of enough seemed completely arbitrary. He also gives out very few As and A-s, but other then that his grading scale is pretty normal. His test were pretty tough, and they were even worse because they always had lots of errors. He didn't seem to spend much effort on making them readable and correct. Also, he was late getting the final grades in and did not seem to understand that that was not ok. It messed a lot of people up, and he didn't seem to care.
In short, he was a very good lecturer, but pretty bad at every other aspect of being a professor.
Based on 8 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.