Steven John Stroessner
Department of Communication
AD
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
39.3%
32.7%
26.2%
19.6%
13.1%
6.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

45.6%
38.0%
30.4%
22.8%
15.2%
7.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 5, 2024

I liked the content of this class - we went over one topic per lecture. Stroessner goes over a TON of content over the 1 hour 15 minutes of class time we have. Oftentimes I would take 5-6 pages of typed notes and I would still have to go back and review things that I missed. The content itself was super interesting though, because this was basically doing a literature review every class. We would cover a topic like Attention, and he would go over the pivotal studies for that, along with a variety of other related studies that further our understanding. He does not record the lectures and his slides are very minimal, so you have to go to hear him describe all the studies - but it was never boring, just a lot of content.

The exams were difficult but manageable if you went to class and read the textbook - it was 40 mcq and 2 short answers. There were 3 midterms, each covering 1/3 of the class (no final). The average was quite low (~71) but I got 88 and 94 on the first two midterms by going to class and taking notes, reading the textbook that he wrote and we had to buy :( and trying to "predict" what the short answers were. Also, the professor held 1 hour Q&A's the night before the midterm. As long as you remember the studies he talks about and the major findings, it's easy to figure out everything else on the midterm. It feels like a classic Comm class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: A
Dec. 5, 2024

I liked the content of this class - we went over one topic per lecture. Stroessner goes over a TON of content over the 1 hour 15 minutes of class time we have. Oftentimes I would take 5-6 pages of typed notes and I would still have to go back and review things that I missed. The content itself was super interesting though, because this was basically doing a literature review every class. We would cover a topic like Attention, and he would go over the pivotal studies for that, along with a variety of other related studies that further our understanding. He does not record the lectures and his slides are very minimal, so you have to go to hear him describe all the studies - but it was never boring, just a lot of content.

The exams were difficult but manageable if you went to class and read the textbook - it was 40 mcq and 2 short answers. There were 3 midterms, each covering 1/3 of the class (no final). The average was quite low (~71) but I got 88 and 94 on the first two midterms by going to class and taking notes, reading the textbook that he wrote and we had to buy :( and trying to "predict" what the short answers were. Also, the professor held 1 hour Q&A's the night before the midterm. As long as you remember the studies he talks about and the major findings, it's easy to figure out everything else on the midterm. It feels like a classic Comm class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!