Stanley B Dong
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
AD
3.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 5.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 5.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2021
Grade: A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
June 16, 2021

This is a very theoretical and not very practical class. The course focuses on how to derive the stiffness properties for a composite layup for a plate or beam, static solutions, and some vibration theory. There is zero discussion of failure modes, manufacturing methods, or different types of materials and weaves, etc. I see this only as useful if you want to go on to do analytical research in a PhD or something.... not at all really useful for someone working in industry.

The professor is relatively clear, but like I said, the material is all theoretical derivations and to me, not that interesting or engaging.

The one benefit of the course in my mind is that the workload is light (weekly homeworks only take a couple hours) and pretty easy.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2021
Grade: A
June 16, 2021

This is a very theoretical and not very practical class. The course focuses on how to derive the stiffness properties for a composite layup for a plate or beam, static solutions, and some vibration theory. There is zero discussion of failure modes, manufacturing methods, or different types of materials and weaves, etc. I see this only as useful if you want to go on to do analytical research in a PhD or something.... not at all really useful for someone working in industry.

The professor is relatively clear, but like I said, the material is all theoretical derivations and to me, not that interesting or engaging.

The one benefit of the course in my mind is that the workload is light (weekly homeworks only take a couple hours) and pretty easy.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 5.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 5.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!