This class will put you to sleep. Professor Sheldon tries to make the class easy for newcomers, but in the end, you're still confused. Overall, the class wasn't too difficult. It's an easy GE, but NOT an EASY A. TA's are super subjective, as past entries say. For some reason, my TA loved giving B+s but not As. Me and two other friends took this class and all ended up with B+s. The way this class grading works is most people will get either Bs or fail. Very few will get As. Just get the handouts, stay 30 minutes to get examples (even though you can use your own examples on the test). Otherwise, this class was a waste of time. For those of you looking for an easy A ge to boost up your GPA, this is not one of them unless you really get to know your ta, seeing as they grade your final, midterm and your paper.

Philosophy is so GODDAMN stupid! Dr. Smith discusses topics I would never imagine being discussed in a college course, like the term "grue" or possibility that a flame is actually dancing elves?! WTF?! The topic of the class is so stupid to me, BUT I will say Dr. Smith made it fun and entertaining. He does ramble on and on, but you can leave whenever, as long as you have the handout to study. In the end, your grade depends on your TA, since they grade your midterm (30%), final (30%), and paper (40%). Go to your TA and let them proofread over your paper at least once if you want a good grade. I wrote it the night before it was due, bad idea! I got a B/B+ only because I went to my TA and talked to him about it before writing it.

Very very easy class. Just pure memorization. Person X believes Y because Z. The final is NOT CUMULATIVE!! Go to class and memorize the handouts he gives out and you will be fine. You must go to class to get examples to use on the essay questions, but discussion is unnecessary.

Professor Smith really loves what he teaches. Even if you don't like philosophy (I don't!!) he makes it okay.

So Phil 8 is an extremely EASY g.e, but it is also the most RIDICULOUS class i've taken.
Don't take this class, unless you want to deal with stupidity the whole quarter.
Unless of course you're a Phil major.
Sheldon Smith, the most boring guy ever! He's nice, and super approachable but he is extremely boring in class.
Midterm and Final, super easy but some of the T.A's are extremely picky which sucks.
Just my advice, don't take this philosophy, if your a science major, unless there's no other option.

Professor Smith is a pretty good professor, and Phil 8 is unbelievably easy. Make sure you go to lecture and get his handouts - they are absolutely invaluable. The only thing you have to do for the midterm, final, and paper is regurgitate what is said in class. It doesn't involve nearly as much work as other philosophy classes, and is a really easy A, especially if you're a phil major.

The information in the class is interesting. He gives handouts at every lecture and they are what the test is based off of, so use them. He gives study guides for both tests. Go to lecture just to get the handouts. They aren't necessary and are very long, although he does try to get a couple jokes in. The grading is VERY subjective. My TA didn't mark anything off on one of my essays and when I approached her, she justified it by saying that she 'still gave me a good score'. So....watch out for that. Make it seem like you care and be VERY specific on the essay section of the exams. He said there was a page limit, but it wasn't strictly enforced. All in all, I'd take the class again. It's not difficult, just make nice with your TA. :)

smith is a great and entertaining teacher. the class is pretty easy in terms of the workload and the material you have to learn. unfortunately, it is NOT easy to get an A. your grade basically rests in the hands of the TA you have. my advice, get to know him/her and go to their office hours so they think you really care about the class. i ended up with an A- in the class even though i really felt like i did absolutely nothing wrong in it. the grading is really subjective and the best thing to do about it is to use VERY SMALL handwriting on your tests so you can fit in as much information as possible on your essays (because there is a page limit). i didnt do this on the midterm and ended up with an 89.4% on it (yeah my TA, luthra, was really a jerk). i got a B+ on my essay, which is worth like half your grade (even though i had several people proofread it, one of which who's a philosophy major who told me "if this isn't an A paper then i dont know what is"). so on the final (worth only like 25% of grade) i wrote really small on my essays and ended up with an A- in the class. so writing small mustve worked. only use the book to expand your knowledge. 99% of what u need to know is on smith's handouts.

prof. smith is very much caring, funny and just good! i guess i can see how some people thought the topics were boring, but here is my opinion: this class tells all about the mind of scientists and just solely looking at the world of science/scientists from the philosopher's point of view.

This class is definitely pretty easy to do well in. Here is what you must do:

1. Go to lecture and take notes and/or get the handouts he gives about the main thinkers and ideas in the class. These will be invaluable come time to study for the midterm and final and will help with your paper also.

2. The paper is 40% of your grade and the final and midterm are 25% each. This means that you must focus on the paper and really know what you are talking about. I did not do this, got a semi-poor grade on my paper and I now must hope that the fairly easy tests will boost my grade.

3. My section was somewhat worthless because my TA sometimes got lost in the material and the students usually didn't do the reading so we ended up talking about concepts we had covered weeks before. The best thing you can do is stay up on your reading so you get your participation grade and have an easier time in studying for your tests.

Overall, I enjoyed the class. Sheldon is a nice, funny guy and really sticks to the material rather than getting off on tangents, especially political ones, as many professors at UCLA do.

I'd recommend this to anyone who needs a philosophy GE or any psychology student who needs to meet their pre-major philosophy req.

Professor Smith is a very nice, and often funny, but this isn't a super easy GE. The material is extremely boring, and, in my opinion, a lot of bs. Listen to other reviewers, do the reading, and go to lecture (and take good notes), but forget discussion, as it typically tuns into dumb people arguing about irrelevent philosophic viewpoints (very annoying). If you don't mind doing the reading it isn't terribly hard, but don't expect to only study the night before tests and get an A.