Sara Burdorff
Department of General Education Clusters
AD
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 13 Users
Easiness 3.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.6 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Often Funny
  • Participation Matters
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Gives Extra Credit
  • Needs Textbook
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
30.1%
25.1%
20.1%
15.1%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

35.2%
29.3%
23.5%
17.6%
11.7%
5.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

29.9%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (11)

2 of 2
2 of 2
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2018
Grade: B
May 1, 2019

In this class, I was expecting to not have to stay up until 4 am in the mornings as an incoming freshman. I felt that this quarter had heavy reading material . Sometimes we would have to read stories ranging from 10 pages to 50 pages and that was not suitable with me as I was taking 2 other classes that were somewhat light-heavy in material. You have 2 papers, each paper is offered a second revision, but be aware that your first revision and second revision both earn a grade. The TA that I had for this quarter was not satisfied with any of my papers, she was continuously focusing on my grammar criteria rather than my analysis. I didn't feel comfortable in this class for the first quarter as I did not learn proper essay writing in high school, so I had to start this quarter off with English Composition 2. I think the grading criteria for this quarter should be less critical to students who are taking an English 2 course on campus because they haven't developed the excessive skills needed yet as students in English 3 have. Furthermore, having not learned proper grammar usage, I highly encourage anyone taking this course to go to the Undergraduate Writing Center a couple of times to make the essays as clean and organized as possible. You would be surprised by the end result. However, second quarter was a little less vigorous on content probably because of the Evals sent to the professors. Although there was massive content, there are also 5 quizzes for the quarter ( 1 quiz towards the end of class every 2-3 weeks). I personally disliked the quizzes as I did not find memorizing all of the reading material would be useful to my success in the future of this class and beyond or help me understand anything. Personally, I thought Professor Burdoff was excited to teach the class, but as her specialty is in European literature, we read stories that are from this region. However, I wish we could have read stories coming across different cultures besides mainly European sources in this class, so that I could read different perspectives that other cultures had on mythology. Overall, I still have no idea how myths apply to today, but it is a good course to take if you are interested in reading many stories, scholarly articles and books, and learning about these concepts beyond a narrative setting.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2018
Grade: B
May 1, 2019

In this class, I was expecting to not have to stay up until 4 am in the mornings as an incoming freshman. I felt that this quarter had heavy reading material . Sometimes we would have to read stories ranging from 10 pages to 50 pages and that was not suitable with me as I was taking 2 other classes that were somewhat light-heavy in material. You have 2 papers, each paper is offered a second revision, but be aware that your first revision and second revision both earn a grade. The TA that I had for this quarter was not satisfied with any of my papers, she was continuously focusing on my grammar criteria rather than my analysis. I didn't feel comfortable in this class for the first quarter as I did not learn proper essay writing in high school, so I had to start this quarter off with English Composition 2. I think the grading criteria for this quarter should be less critical to students who are taking an English 2 course on campus because they haven't developed the excessive skills needed yet as students in English 3 have. Furthermore, having not learned proper grammar usage, I highly encourage anyone taking this course to go to the Undergraduate Writing Center a couple of times to make the essays as clean and organized as possible. You would be surprised by the end result. However, second quarter was a little less vigorous on content probably because of the Evals sent to the professors. Although there was massive content, there are also 5 quizzes for the quarter ( 1 quiz towards the end of class every 2-3 weeks). I personally disliked the quizzes as I did not find memorizing all of the reading material would be useful to my success in the future of this class and beyond or help me understand anything. Personally, I thought Professor Burdoff was excited to teach the class, but as her specialty is in European literature, we read stories that are from this region. However, I wish we could have read stories coming across different cultures besides mainly European sources in this class, so that I could read different perspectives that other cultures had on mythology. Overall, I still have no idea how myths apply to today, but it is a good course to take if you are interested in reading many stories, scholarly articles and books, and learning about these concepts beyond a narrative setting.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
2 of 2
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 13 Users
Easiness 3.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.6 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (8)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (7)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (7)
  • Often Funny
    (7)
  • Participation Matters
    (7)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (6)
  • Gives Extra Credit
    (7)
  • Needs Textbook
    (5)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!