Sandra Batista
Department of Computer Science
AD
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Tough Tests
  • Gives Extra Credit
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Summer 2024
Grade: NR
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Sept. 3, 2024

NOTE: This is a review for CS 180 Introduction to Algorithms and Complexity, NOT CS 181 Theory of Computing. For some reason, Bruinwalk didn't have the class listed so I'm leaving the review here for now.

Class overview:
7X Homework assignments
Midterm
Final
3X Extra Credit assignments
Recorded and annotated lectures

Avoid this professor if you want to understand the material to any degree (however, it is not hard to get a decent grade as long as you put in work). She is a nice person with generous policies on homework/extra credit but her extremely vague lectures and very poor communication to her students do not make up for it in the slightest. The material for this class is challenging enough as it is (although it is quite interesting) but her poor explanatory skills make it 100X worse. Stick to the textbook or request the department for Recorded Lectures from a different, more competent professor. Tests are exceedingly long (given 4 hours but you often need more) and rubrics for points are often vague (expect stuff like "1 more points" and "3 logic" to be the type of comments you get back on your exams to justify you getting or losing X amount of points on Gradescope). Additionally, the questions have a tendency to cascade (i.e. you miss one part of the question, you're likely to also miss the following points as they are based off of the previous question) and she appears to be extremely stingy in giving back points in regrade requests (she does seem to acknowledge the difficulty of the exams and grades somewhat generously however). Homework is virtually impossible without outside help after like the third one but they are graded on completion. She does not reply to emails (like ever, it's not just me either but I've heard the same thing from a bunch of other students) and her KEYS or homework assignments and exams often need multiple additional piazza posts to explain problems to solutions because of how incomplete they are.

Overall-

Pros:
lenient homework policy with auto-extension of two days and completion grading
annotated slides
extra credit opportunities
generous grading (although this may be due to how shit her exams are)

Cons:
terrible communication and teaching skill (whether through piazza, email, or explaining concepts in class) *granted, this may be a bit subjective but according to me and roughly another dozen or so students, this is the consensus*
4 hour (plus) exams for midterm and final and cascading questions (also takes a while to get grades back)
Incomplete keys

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Summer 2024
Grade: NR
Sept. 3, 2024

NOTE: This is a review for CS 180 Introduction to Algorithms and Complexity, NOT CS 181 Theory of Computing. For some reason, Bruinwalk didn't have the class listed so I'm leaving the review here for now.

Class overview:
7X Homework assignments
Midterm
Final
3X Extra Credit assignments
Recorded and annotated lectures

Avoid this professor if you want to understand the material to any degree (however, it is not hard to get a decent grade as long as you put in work). She is a nice person with generous policies on homework/extra credit but her extremely vague lectures and very poor communication to her students do not make up for it in the slightest. The material for this class is challenging enough as it is (although it is quite interesting) but her poor explanatory skills make it 100X worse. Stick to the textbook or request the department for Recorded Lectures from a different, more competent professor. Tests are exceedingly long (given 4 hours but you often need more) and rubrics for points are often vague (expect stuff like "1 more points" and "3 logic" to be the type of comments you get back on your exams to justify you getting or losing X amount of points on Gradescope). Additionally, the questions have a tendency to cascade (i.e. you miss one part of the question, you're likely to also miss the following points as they are based off of the previous question) and she appears to be extremely stingy in giving back points in regrade requests (she does seem to acknowledge the difficulty of the exams and grades somewhat generously however). Homework is virtually impossible without outside help after like the third one but they are graded on completion. She does not reply to emails (like ever, it's not just me either but I've heard the same thing from a bunch of other students) and her KEYS or homework assignments and exams often need multiple additional piazza posts to explain problems to solutions because of how incomplete they are.

Overall-

Pros:
lenient homework policy with auto-extension of two days and completion grading
annotated slides
extra credit opportunities
generous grading (although this may be due to how shit her exams are)

Cons:
terrible communication and teaching skill (whether through piazza, email, or explaining concepts in class) *granted, this may be a bit subjective but according to me and roughly another dozen or so students, this is the consensus*
4 hour (plus) exams for midterm and final and cascading questions (also takes a while to get grades back)
Incomplete keys

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (1)
  • Tough Tests
    (1)
  • Gives Extra Credit
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!