- Home
- Search
- Robert W Fink
- CLUSTER 60CW
AD
Based on 2 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides
- Tolerates Tardiness
- Engaging Lectures
- Appropriately Priced Materials
- Snazzy Dresser
- Often Funny
- Participation Matters
- Gives Extra Credit
- Would Take Again
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
This is for the Cluster 60 in general. I decided to take this cluster for its credit (satisfies 4 GE, writing II, diversity, etc). I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS CLASS. Clusters do have the reputation of having a greater workload but it is not the case for this one. I'm so glad that I stuck with this cluster for my freshman year. It's pretty interesting and definitely a GPA booster in my opinion.
It's not the easiest A as you do have to pay attention to lecture, do the readings (at least for the first quarter. I stopped using the course reader after the midterm of fall quarter and was perfectly fine). This class helped me adjust to college along with making new friends and strong bonds with my TA.
Another benefit for this class is that you get priority for Eng Comp 3 (if you need to take it) for your winter/spring quarter. Based on what I heard from my peers, Eng Comp 3 and writing classes general are EXTREMELY hard to get in since everyone needs to take at least one writing class. You won't have to worry about it as you receive your writing II credit during your spring quarter, which is basically a three hour seminar one a week. You also don't have to worry about not getting a class since you are guaranteed enrollment to the course for winter and spring .
I assume that you are reading this review to decide to take this class or not. Well I would like to say TAKE IT because it is extremely rewarding and you won't regret it. I benefited a lot from this class and it satisfied most of my GE requirements as a STEM major.
This review is actually for my TA Sandra Kilman and her seminar entitled "Sisters In Song", but since she's not on Bruinwalk and this was a musicology-based course I thought I'd leave it under Fink's name.
My seminar was really chill, fun and interesting, but I know that others can be kind of intense. You really have to pick a topic that you're interested in. My friends enrolled in seminars because they thought their TA would be as chill and lenient as they were throughout the year. Since this is a seminar, the TAs are really passionate and would like you to put in quite a bit of effort in the subject of their specialty, whether its literature, politics, or cinema. If you're not interested in the seminar's topic, you're not going to do as well as you could have.
My seminar was so much fun, because we listened to music each week and if we had time we would talk about the readings (which were also fun, because they were about a specific female artist). It was a safe space where we talked about prominent performers and their significance within 1950s doo-wop, R&B, Jazz, Country/Folk, Motown, Rock n Roll, theater, cinema, and Soul/Funk!
In terms of workload, each week on CCLE we would listen to a list of song recordings in the certain genre that Sandra posted and then submit a paragraph. We would also review the readings and come up with two discussion points or questions on each, although bringing them up was not mandatory, just encouraged since participation is part of your grade too. Finally, we would search on Youtube for a recording of a song in the genre that Sandra hadn't posted, submit the link on CCLE and play it and briefly discuss it with the class. The song sharing and reading discussion parts took up most of our time in class. We also wrote a short essay (about 2 pages double spaced) on a specific musical's song and either its plot or significance. For our 'final', we had been working on an essay about a song or comparison of songs from a prominent artist, breaking it down musicologically and tying it back to the cultural and personal significance. Of course, this format might be different in future seminars.
They vary the seminar topics each year, but Sandra is a great TA. She's been very empathetic, caring, thoughtful, and chill this quarter, especially with the pandemic going on right now. She was like a mom to all of her students and I think each of us came to class with genuine enthusiasm. She used to be a performer herself so she's very knowledgeable on music terminology. I would 200% recommend taking Sandra, especially if you're interested in musicology. I almost took a political science seminar just because I had been with that TA for 60A and 60B and he was a chill grader. Like I mentioned, just pick a seminar that you're interested in, because any class is difficult if your attitude and mindset aren't in the right mode.
This is for the Cluster 60 in general. I decided to take this cluster for its credit (satisfies 4 GE, writing II, diversity, etc). I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS CLASS. Clusters do have the reputation of having a greater workload but it is not the case for this one. I'm so glad that I stuck with this cluster for my freshman year. It's pretty interesting and definitely a GPA booster in my opinion.
It's not the easiest A as you do have to pay attention to lecture, do the readings (at least for the first quarter. I stopped using the course reader after the midterm of fall quarter and was perfectly fine). This class helped me adjust to college along with making new friends and strong bonds with my TA.
Another benefit for this class is that you get priority for Eng Comp 3 (if you need to take it) for your winter/spring quarter. Based on what I heard from my peers, Eng Comp 3 and writing classes general are EXTREMELY hard to get in since everyone needs to take at least one writing class. You won't have to worry about it as you receive your writing II credit during your spring quarter, which is basically a three hour seminar one a week. You also don't have to worry about not getting a class since you are guaranteed enrollment to the course for winter and spring .
I assume that you are reading this review to decide to take this class or not. Well I would like to say TAKE IT because it is extremely rewarding and you won't regret it. I benefited a lot from this class and it satisfied most of my GE requirements as a STEM major.
This review is actually for my TA Sandra Kilman and her seminar entitled "Sisters In Song", but since she's not on Bruinwalk and this was a musicology-based course I thought I'd leave it under Fink's name.
My seminar was really chill, fun and interesting, but I know that others can be kind of intense. You really have to pick a topic that you're interested in. My friends enrolled in seminars because they thought their TA would be as chill and lenient as they were throughout the year. Since this is a seminar, the TAs are really passionate and would like you to put in quite a bit of effort in the subject of their specialty, whether its literature, politics, or cinema. If you're not interested in the seminar's topic, you're not going to do as well as you could have.
My seminar was so much fun, because we listened to music each week and if we had time we would talk about the readings (which were also fun, because they were about a specific female artist). It was a safe space where we talked about prominent performers and their significance within 1950s doo-wop, R&B, Jazz, Country/Folk, Motown, Rock n Roll, theater, cinema, and Soul/Funk!
In terms of workload, each week on CCLE we would listen to a list of song recordings in the certain genre that Sandra posted and then submit a paragraph. We would also review the readings and come up with two discussion points or questions on each, although bringing them up was not mandatory, just encouraged since participation is part of your grade too. Finally, we would search on Youtube for a recording of a song in the genre that Sandra hadn't posted, submit the link on CCLE and play it and briefly discuss it with the class. The song sharing and reading discussion parts took up most of our time in class. We also wrote a short essay (about 2 pages double spaced) on a specific musical's song and either its plot or significance. For our 'final', we had been working on an essay about a song or comparison of songs from a prominent artist, breaking it down musicologically and tying it back to the cultural and personal significance. Of course, this format might be different in future seminars.
They vary the seminar topics each year, but Sandra is a great TA. She's been very empathetic, caring, thoughtful, and chill this quarter, especially with the pandemic going on right now. She was like a mom to all of her students and I think each of us came to class with genuine enthusiasm. She used to be a performer herself so she's very knowledgeable on music terminology. I would 200% recommend taking Sandra, especially if you're interested in musicology. I almost took a political science seminar just because I had been with that TA for 60A and 60B and he was a chill grader. Like I mentioned, just pick a seminar that you're interested in, because any class is difficult if your attitude and mindset aren't in the right mode.
Based on 2 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides (1)
- Tolerates Tardiness (1)
- Engaging Lectures (1)
- Appropriately Priced Materials (1)
- Snazzy Dresser (1)
- Often Funny (1)
- Participation Matters (1)
- Gives Extra Credit (1)
- Would Take Again (1)