Professor

Robert Hager

AD
2.6
Overall Ratings
Based on 58 Users
Easiness 1.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 1.7 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 1.9 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 2.2 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (58)

2 of 2
2 of 2
Add your review...
Feb. 26, 2010
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

I cannot believe UCLA has someone like this teaching their students. First of all, he is very awkward. I have caught him at least twice talking and laughing to himself. Second, he is very rude to students or at lest to those he thinks are not conservative ( meaning not a white republican). Third, I think he grades unfairly. He says, he has a curve in his class, but I think he knows who he wants to give the "A" to and whom not to give it to. So unless you can show this guy any conservative characteristics, avoid him at all costs. There are so many good poli sci professors here at UCLA. Take any of the other ones instead of this one.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Feb. 26, 2009
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

Extremely boring to listen to in lecture. His slides are all posted online and he basically reads off of them word for word. Nobody goes to class because it's basically worthless. First paper is 50% of the grade (15-20 pages) on the Cold War and then there is a 50% final. Not much else to say--it's that boring.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
May 31, 2017
Quarter: Spring 2015
Grade: P

Selling 3rd EDITION of "World Politics" by Friedman/Lake/Schultz.
It's a required text for POL SCI 20. Great condition.
Contact for details **********

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
June 9, 2009
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

The class was called "Foreign Relations After 9/11" - even his syllabus claimed that the class looks at "American foreign relations with several regions of the world since the 9/11 attacks", but we did absolutely no such thing. The majority of the class was spent on past wars (WWII, Cold War), only one lecture was spent on al Quaeda and the Taliban, and we ended the course with a discussion of Russia/Iran/Chinese relations and a historical look on Korea (including the Korean War). My point: he did NOT stick to what the class was supposed to be about.

As far as lecture goes, overall it was boring and dry, and if you really paid attention, you'd find that he talks all over the place and that it's kind of difficult to keep up even with a laptop. His only response to all questions in office hours was to "go do the reading". I will give him one thing, he does know history and foreign relations in other regions of the world...just nothing much on what this class was supposed to be about.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
POL SCI 128A
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Feb. 26, 2010

I cannot believe UCLA has someone like this teaching their students. First of all, he is very awkward. I have caught him at least twice talking and laughing to himself. Second, he is very rude to students or at lest to those he thinks are not conservative ( meaning not a white republican). Third, I think he grades unfairly. He says, he has a curve in his class, but I think he knows who he wants to give the "A" to and whom not to give it to. So unless you can show this guy any conservative characteristics, avoid him at all costs. There are so many good poli sci professors here at UCLA. Take any of the other ones instead of this one.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
POL SCI 139
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Feb. 26, 2009

Extremely boring to listen to in lecture. His slides are all posted online and he basically reads off of them word for word. Nobody goes to class because it's basically worthless. First paper is 50% of the grade (15-20 pages) on the Cold War and then there is a 50% final. Not much else to say--it's that boring.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
POL SCI 20
Quarter: Spring 2015
Grade: P
May 31, 2017

Selling 3rd EDITION of "World Politics" by Friedman/Lake/Schultz.
It's a required text for POL SCI 20. Great condition.
Contact for details **********

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
POL SCI 120A
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 9, 2009

The class was called "Foreign Relations After 9/11" - even his syllabus claimed that the class looks at "American foreign relations with several regions of the world since the 9/11 attacks", but we did absolutely no such thing. The majority of the class was spent on past wars (WWII, Cold War), only one lecture was spent on al Quaeda and the Taliban, and we ended the course with a discussion of Russia/Iran/Chinese relations and a historical look on Korea (including the Korean War). My point: he did NOT stick to what the class was supposed to be about.

As far as lecture goes, overall it was boring and dry, and if you really paid attention, you'd find that he talks all over the place and that it's kind of difficult to keep up even with a laptop. His only response to all questions in office hours was to "go do the reading". I will give him one thing, he does know history and foreign relations in other regions of the world...just nothing much on what this class was supposed to be about.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
2 of 2
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!