- Home
- Search
- Richard R Muntz
- COM SCI 112
AD
Based on 6 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
Prof. Muntz is one guy who's teaching you should avoid at all costs. His lectures are bad in three ways: first, he gets confused frequently while explaining the topic, which sends every student's already slim hopes of understanding anything down the drain. Next, his presentation slides.. They are very cryptic and unorganized (and ungodly looking). Third, he has bad writing (though he admits it) and uses some kinky notation to explain advanced statistical concepts - and the notation is DIFFERENT FROM ONE ON SLIDES AND FROM ONE IN THE TEXTBOOK(s)!
Overall, I deeply regret taking Muntz for 112. Even though the course is statistics-based and I did extremely well in STATS 110A, I had to drop to avoid getting an "F" in that class.
Prof. Muntz is one guy who's teaching you should avoid at all costs. His lectures are bad in three ways: first, he gets confused frequently while explaining the topic, which sends every student's already slim hopes of understanding anything down the drain. Next, his presentation slides.. They are very cryptic and unorganized (and ungodly looking). Third, he has bad writing (though he admits it) and uses some kinky notation to explain advanced statistical concepts - and the notation is DIFFERENT FROM ONE ON SLIDES AND FROM ONE IN THE TEXTBOOK(s)!
Overall, I deeply regret taking Muntz for 112. Even though the course is statistics-based and I did extremely well in STATS 110A, I had to drop to avoid getting an "F" in that class.
Based on 6 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.