Richard Groper
Department of Communication
AD
1.5
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 1.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (4)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 26, 2002

I think it should be against UCLA's policy to allow such unqualified professors to "teach" us. His class was a waste of time, money and energy.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 22, 2002

one of the worst professors i have EVER taken. He was very, very rude when people made comments that were in conflict with his own views in class. He did not prepare us at all for the final paper. He has the most weirdest grading scale. First of all, he makes us take this midterm at 8th week and tells us not to worry about it at all because it was going to be easy and he would not test us on anything that is in the book but he didnt cover. Of course, he exaggerated the "easiness" of his midterm, he also tested us on stuff he didnt cover. And, his curve for the midterm was not even a curve at all! Secondly, after the midterm he told us that if whatever we get in the paper will be our grade in the class. THEN WHY DID WE TAKE THE MIDTERM???? Please, please, PLEASE do not take this guy. We need this guy to get out of here immediately.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 7, 2002

While everyone else is mostly interested in discussing Groper's monotone voice or boring lectures, I would simply like to add that he is the most unorganized, unqualified and ignorant professor I have ever had. Taking his class was an insult to my intelligence, and his condescending attitude is absolutely unnecessary. If you are looking at this to decide whether or not to take his class, don't. Not even if it fits your schedule perfectly. It will ruin your entire quarter.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Feb. 13, 2002

His lectures are incredibly boring. He talks slower than anyone I have ever hear and what he says is rarely interesting and rarely useful or on topic. However, he grades in a mysterious way and for the amount he teaches, the way he grades is WAY too harsh. If you need to take this class, you should wait for another professor because you will never want to go to class and you won't get the grade you think you deserve.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 26, 2002

I think it should be against UCLA's policy to allow such unqualified professors to "teach" us. His class was a waste of time, money and energy.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 22, 2002

one of the worst professors i have EVER taken. He was very, very rude when people made comments that were in conflict with his own views in class. He did not prepare us at all for the final paper. He has the most weirdest grading scale. First of all, he makes us take this midterm at 8th week and tells us not to worry about it at all because it was going to be easy and he would not test us on anything that is in the book but he didnt cover. Of course, he exaggerated the "easiness" of his midterm, he also tested us on stuff he didnt cover. And, his curve for the midterm was not even a curve at all! Secondly, after the midterm he told us that if whatever we get in the paper will be our grade in the class. THEN WHY DID WE TAKE THE MIDTERM???? Please, please, PLEASE do not take this guy. We need this guy to get out of here immediately.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 7, 2002

While everyone else is mostly interested in discussing Groper's monotone voice or boring lectures, I would simply like to add that he is the most unorganized, unqualified and ignorant professor I have ever had. Taking his class was an insult to my intelligence, and his condescending attitude is absolutely unnecessary. If you are looking at this to decide whether or not to take his class, don't. Not even if it fits your schedule perfectly. It will ruin your entire quarter.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Feb. 13, 2002

His lectures are incredibly boring. He talks slower than anyone I have ever hear and what he says is rarely interesting and rarely useful or on topic. However, he grades in a mysterious way and for the amount he teaches, the way he grades is WAY too harsh. If you need to take this class, you should wait for another professor because you will never want to go to class and you won't get the grade you think you deserve.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
1.5
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 1.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!