Not the biggest fan of her.

She's nice, but that's about it. Very disorganized and boring during lecture. Topics focused intensely on her own research.

It was her first time teaching intro psych so she might just be better with upperdivs..

Greenfield was a sweet lady, but a really disorganized professor. Her Powerpoints were always uploaded late, and she showed up to class without her Audio/Visual materials several times. Another thing that bothered me was the Powerpoints themselves--they were very poorly made and I usually had to go back and reformat them so that they were more readable before printing them. She introduced some of her own work into the course (some studies she did in Mexico), which at first I though was weird, but at the end I guess it all tied together.
Her exam was pretty difficult and required some abstract thinking. Some questions were more detailed than I'd expected, and I studied a lot.
Overall, I absolutely hated her presentations, but the subject matter was really interesting, and if you work hard to integrate the lecture material with the book material, you'll do fine.

Very nice professor. She was the third professor for the modules in Psychology 10. Lectures were integrations between the book and her research. She's not a pure psychologist, but rather a mix of psychologist, anthropologist, and sociologist. Her test was slightly on the difficult side, it was short answer and not just recall. The only thing I didn't like about Greenfield was she was somewhat unorganized. Usually her Powerpoint slides were uploaded 30 minutes before the lecture began. She also had issues in arriving on time for lectures and getting the VCR to work. Despite these issues, she was a fair professor.