- Home
- Search
- Pamela Kennedy
- PSYCH 115
AD
Based on 44 Users
TOP TAGS
- Tough Tests
- Uses Slides
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
I've been thinking and thinking about what to write for this class because I took it a while ago, BUT what I have definitely come to terms with is that Professor Kennedy is the ABSOLUTE WORST professor I've ever had at UCLA. As I've found she makes you feel stupid for not knowing certain things, she can't explain things correctly, and she's just not a pleasant person to be around for office hours. I say if you truly need to take this class, find someone else because holy hell she is a nightmare. and to top it all off there is so much material that she expects you to know the second she presents it.
I am going to retake this class because the first time with her dropped my GPA really bad.
if you do take her, good luck! just prepare to memorize 100+ slides in 10 weeks
Do not make the mistake of ignoring all the negative reviews this professor has received. This class is designed to leave your insane and lifeless. It really does require 12 plus hours of studying outside of lectures. The lecture materials is not as confusing, however, the exams are a whole different thing. They are written terribly. The psychology department did nothing to accommodate our request during the strike despite most students only having 4 to 5 discussions sections all quarter. She is not as welcoming as the TA. She isn't a bad person, but it's her teaching methods that need improvement.
I took this class as a last-minute decision as my other top options were all filled up by the time my enrollment came and I didn't read the reviews prior to enrolling. I didn't think this class with Kennedy was that bad like others have said. It requires a lot of memorization on your part but if you actually understand the course material in classes like Psych 10 and LS7A, you'll honestly do fine. Material taught in lectures build upon one another so I suggest taking the time to fully understand material in the first 3 weeks. I recommend this: take a discussion section towards the END of the week (Thursday or Friday) since Kennedy implements discussion section quizzes and they make up an important part of your grade (30%). Lectures were on Mon and Wed and you were tested on the previous week's material so this gives you ample time to study and review material from the prior week. Make sure you know pretty much everything that she has on her slides, even the little words. I recommend flashcards and drawing/labeling the diagrams yourself. When she uploads her lecture slides, review over them and get yourself familiarized with the information. Then, during class, she goes pretty fast and also reads off the slides so write down info that is NOT on the slides so you don't spend a majority of your time just writing instead of listening. Also, her lectures have an average of about 40ish slides but most say the same thing, just in a different perspective. After that, make some flashcards and read the textbook! You can find a free pdf online and it includes lots of information that honestly cleared up any confusion that I had in class. You can skip the parts that she doesn't cover in class that are in the textbook since she only tests you on what is on the slides. I have never really been to her OHs but from her discussion forum responses, it's intimidating to talk to her so I lean on my TAs to help me. For the MTs and final exam, be able to apply your knowledge. She's going to give you information about a situation and you have to respond with what is most likely damaged in that person or the area of the brain that the person is using to execute a task. They're all multiple choice but the tests often had tricky language that I couldn't get past. Each Midterm or Final weighed 23/24% of your grade and she gave 2% extra credit if you completed the required hours of SONA. She also drops the two lowest quiz grades that you take in discussion. If you need any help studying for MTs or the final, you can hit me up at ********** and I can send some maps that my TAs created for me for the different lectures that helped me.
Horrendous teacher. I have gotten all A's so far and taken neurosciences classes for graduate students and this class was way harder. The test questions do not make sense. I never write reviews for anything so if you are seeing this, this is your sign to not take this class.
This professor it horrible. I got an A only after studying for at least 10 hrs per week trying to memorize every single detail presented in lecture and didn't fall for her trick questions of exams. DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS unless you are prepared to spend countless hours memorizing material that doesnt even make sense. The lectures include so much unnecessary detail, and she never connects anything even in the slides. The slides seem like they were put in a random order as one doesnt connect to the next even slightly. When she is presenting, its almost like she has never seen the slides before in her life. My TA was amazing and super helpful, the professor was not. The grade breakdown is three exams together worth 70%. They are not cumulative which was nice, but they are incredibly difficult and detail-oriented. I recommend making quizlets; I had at least 80 flashcards for every lecture. The other 30% comes from weekly quizzes that are also impossible.
With peace and love, I strongly advise against taking this class.
The grading scheme is based entirely on 8 quizzes, 2 midterms, and the final. Granted, the 2 lowest quiz grades are dropped, but the exams cover 5-6 dense lectures with 50 slides each and anything is fair game. Additionally, that very specific information is to be applied to niche hypothetical questions (some are trick questions) making them very difficult.
There is no homework to practice these applications which makes memorizing and applying the information hard. As mentioned in other reviews, Professor Kennedy had to scale our class because everyone did so poorly.
The TA's and professor are generally not on the same page and the professor can be condescending. I would suggest taking a different class if this is a major requirement.
Overall, this course is very difficult and I do not recommend taking Psych 115 with Kennedy. Despite constant studying and attending lectures I was still unable to perform well on exams/quizzes. The lecture material is extremely dense and exams are challenging! The Professor often includes the most difficult questions based on lectures, as well as trick questions. Proceed with caution if you take this course!
I didn't have as much of a struggle as other people did with this class during COVID, but I will list a few positives:
-she does the 2% SONA extra credit
-she dropped one of our discussion section quizzes in addition to the two dropped on the syllabus
-gave us the choice to change how our tests were weighed (30%-30%-15% vs 25%-25%-25%)
The class is entirely multiple choice exam based so there isn't as much of a need to participate, but going to office hours to clarify concepts helps a LOT since sometimes she glosses over things in lecture. Also, if Maggie ever teaches as a TA for this class again, highly recommend you pick them. If you're pre-med, try to study for this class like the MCAT. Flashcards all the way and maybe flow charts for some of the systems and pathways. Overall, tough class, but its a lot easier with study methods that test memorization and office hour clarifications.
I've been thinking and thinking about what to write for this class because I took it a while ago, BUT what I have definitely come to terms with is that Professor Kennedy is the ABSOLUTE WORST professor I've ever had at UCLA. As I've found she makes you feel stupid for not knowing certain things, she can't explain things correctly, and she's just not a pleasant person to be around for office hours. I say if you truly need to take this class, find someone else because holy hell she is a nightmare. and to top it all off there is so much material that she expects you to know the second she presents it.
I am going to retake this class because the first time with her dropped my GPA really bad.
if you do take her, good luck! just prepare to memorize 100+ slides in 10 weeks
Do not make the mistake of ignoring all the negative reviews this professor has received. This class is designed to leave your insane and lifeless. It really does require 12 plus hours of studying outside of lectures. The lecture materials is not as confusing, however, the exams are a whole different thing. They are written terribly. The psychology department did nothing to accommodate our request during the strike despite most students only having 4 to 5 discussions sections all quarter. She is not as welcoming as the TA. She isn't a bad person, but it's her teaching methods that need improvement.
I took this class as a last-minute decision as my other top options were all filled up by the time my enrollment came and I didn't read the reviews prior to enrolling. I didn't think this class with Kennedy was that bad like others have said. It requires a lot of memorization on your part but if you actually understand the course material in classes like Psych 10 and LS7A, you'll honestly do fine. Material taught in lectures build upon one another so I suggest taking the time to fully understand material in the first 3 weeks. I recommend this: take a discussion section towards the END of the week (Thursday or Friday) since Kennedy implements discussion section quizzes and they make up an important part of your grade (30%). Lectures were on Mon and Wed and you were tested on the previous week's material so this gives you ample time to study and review material from the prior week. Make sure you know pretty much everything that she has on her slides, even the little words. I recommend flashcards and drawing/labeling the diagrams yourself. When she uploads her lecture slides, review over them and get yourself familiarized with the information. Then, during class, she goes pretty fast and also reads off the slides so write down info that is NOT on the slides so you don't spend a majority of your time just writing instead of listening. Also, her lectures have an average of about 40ish slides but most say the same thing, just in a different perspective. After that, make some flashcards and read the textbook! You can find a free pdf online and it includes lots of information that honestly cleared up any confusion that I had in class. You can skip the parts that she doesn't cover in class that are in the textbook since she only tests you on what is on the slides. I have never really been to her OHs but from her discussion forum responses, it's intimidating to talk to her so I lean on my TAs to help me. For the MTs and final exam, be able to apply your knowledge. She's going to give you information about a situation and you have to respond with what is most likely damaged in that person or the area of the brain that the person is using to execute a task. They're all multiple choice but the tests often had tricky language that I couldn't get past. Each Midterm or Final weighed 23/24% of your grade and she gave 2% extra credit if you completed the required hours of SONA. She also drops the two lowest quiz grades that you take in discussion. If you need any help studying for MTs or the final, you can hit me up at ********** and I can send some maps that my TAs created for me for the different lectures that helped me.
Horrendous teacher. I have gotten all A's so far and taken neurosciences classes for graduate students and this class was way harder. The test questions do not make sense. I never write reviews for anything so if you are seeing this, this is your sign to not take this class.
This professor it horrible. I got an A only after studying for at least 10 hrs per week trying to memorize every single detail presented in lecture and didn't fall for her trick questions of exams. DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS unless you are prepared to spend countless hours memorizing material that doesnt even make sense. The lectures include so much unnecessary detail, and she never connects anything even in the slides. The slides seem like they were put in a random order as one doesnt connect to the next even slightly. When she is presenting, its almost like she has never seen the slides before in her life. My TA was amazing and super helpful, the professor was not. The grade breakdown is three exams together worth 70%. They are not cumulative which was nice, but they are incredibly difficult and detail-oriented. I recommend making quizlets; I had at least 80 flashcards for every lecture. The other 30% comes from weekly quizzes that are also impossible.
With peace and love, I strongly advise against taking this class.
The grading scheme is based entirely on 8 quizzes, 2 midterms, and the final. Granted, the 2 lowest quiz grades are dropped, but the exams cover 5-6 dense lectures with 50 slides each and anything is fair game. Additionally, that very specific information is to be applied to niche hypothetical questions (some are trick questions) making them very difficult.
There is no homework to practice these applications which makes memorizing and applying the information hard. As mentioned in other reviews, Professor Kennedy had to scale our class because everyone did so poorly.
The TA's and professor are generally not on the same page and the professor can be condescending. I would suggest taking a different class if this is a major requirement.
Overall, this course is very difficult and I do not recommend taking Psych 115 with Kennedy. Despite constant studying and attending lectures I was still unable to perform well on exams/quizzes. The lecture material is extremely dense and exams are challenging! The Professor often includes the most difficult questions based on lectures, as well as trick questions. Proceed with caution if you take this course!
I didn't have as much of a struggle as other people did with this class during COVID, but I will list a few positives:
-she does the 2% SONA extra credit
-she dropped one of our discussion section quizzes in addition to the two dropped on the syllabus
-gave us the choice to change how our tests were weighed (30%-30%-15% vs 25%-25%-25%)
The class is entirely multiple choice exam based so there isn't as much of a need to participate, but going to office hours to clarify concepts helps a LOT since sometimes she glosses over things in lecture. Also, if Maggie ever teaches as a TA for this class again, highly recommend you pick them. If you're pre-med, try to study for this class like the MCAT. Flashcards all the way and maybe flow charts for some of the systems and pathways. Overall, tough class, but its a lot easier with study methods that test memorization and office hour clarifications.
Based on 44 Users
TOP TAGS
- Tough Tests (25)
- Uses Slides (21)