- Home
- Search
- Otto Santa ana
- CHICANO 171
AD
Based on 2 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides
- Is Podcasted
- Engaging Lectures
- Useful Textbooks
- Participation Matters
- Gives Extra Credit
- Would Take Again
- Has Group Projects
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
Professor Santa Ana...is odd. On one hand, I can tell that he really does enjoy teaching and he does try his hardest to teach in lecture. I definitely learned some things that are interesting that I would love to learn more about. HOWEVER, this course is...Not great. The professor was unclear in his grading methods, and I think internet communication made everything worse. I wouldn't recommend this course - it isn't exactly what I envisioned a Chicano studies course to be. It was boring, rough around the edges, and it needs a LOT of refining. The readings were insanely long, assignments confusing, and it was just a bad vibe all around. You can always make your own choice, but I wish I read the reviews before I took this class with this professor.
I took this course on-line. Professor Santa Ana is chill, he has extended many class assignments to help the students out. Many times he gave extra credit, which can be useful but I did not do any of the extra credit. This class is based off humor covering topics of gender humor, racist humor, and humor used in social media to mention a few. The course book was one the professor wrote, which he gave access too. The course consisted of 1 dissection post and 1 short essay (2 paragraphs) each week and a 10 page final paper but no test, no mid-term, and no final exam. Overall I learned some things I did not know about humor and what it can cause.
Professor Santa Ana...is odd. On one hand, I can tell that he really does enjoy teaching and he does try his hardest to teach in lecture. I definitely learned some things that are interesting that I would love to learn more about. HOWEVER, this course is...Not great. The professor was unclear in his grading methods, and I think internet communication made everything worse. I wouldn't recommend this course - it isn't exactly what I envisioned a Chicano studies course to be. It was boring, rough around the edges, and it needs a LOT of refining. The readings were insanely long, assignments confusing, and it was just a bad vibe all around. You can always make your own choice, but I wish I read the reviews before I took this class with this professor.
I took this course on-line. Professor Santa Ana is chill, he has extended many class assignments to help the students out. Many times he gave extra credit, which can be useful but I did not do any of the extra credit. This class is based off humor covering topics of gender humor, racist humor, and humor used in social media to mention a few. The course book was one the professor wrote, which he gave access too. The course consisted of 1 dissection post and 1 short essay (2 paragraphs) each week and a 10 page final paper but no test, no mid-term, and no final exam. Overall I learned some things I did not know about humor and what it can cause.
Based on 2 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides (1)
- Is Podcasted (1)
- Engaging Lectures (1)
- Useful Textbooks (1)
- Participation Matters (1)
- Gives Extra Credit (2)
- Would Take Again (1)
- Has Group Projects (2)