Dropped this class two weeks in because the professor treated us like middle schoolers. First of all, she started her first lecture by telling us we were not allowed to use laptops, and if we had to use it, we had to sit at the back of the class and she would get TAs to monitor us. She probably forgot about it because no one really cared the next lecture.

Secondly, her lectures are incredibly dull and she goes off tangents. She spent 35 minutes one lecture for us to finish an activity that would not be graded at all, and most people started to get bored 10 minutes in. She also went off tangent talking about topics that did not contribute to the class whatsoever for another 10 minutes. Most people in class and my discussion were complaining about her lectures because they were incredibly unorganized and did not have any coherency.

Thirdly, I can't emphasize how much this lecturer treated us like middle schoolers, which was incredibly frustrating. I missed the end of a lecture due to a conflicting lecture and I absentmindedly rushed off without collecting my assignment. I emailed the professor because the assignment was 10% and she did not care to upload a 10% assignment online. I was rejected and she told me that it was my fault (which is), and she would not send me a copy of the 10% graded assignment. Seriously? I would have understood if the assignment was 1% of my grade, but turning down a 10% assignment was really unfair because I made a simple mistake and I apologized for it. Having a 10% take home assignment that she stubbornly refuses to upload online was pretty unfair because people might have emergencies that cause them to miss their lecture. Her inflexibility led me to believe that this class is simply not worth it at all.

Fourth, she took 15 minutes to go through the IPA chart, contributing to much confusion in class. She then proceeded to throw us her webpage and kept advertising how good it was and how we should do all our learning on her webpage. I would have understood if this was some readings to supplement our knowledge of the subject, but the fact is that she barely even touched upon the subject (what is this class about, anyway?) and made us learn what was essential for the class by ourselves. She then proceeded to ask us for tips on learning it when it was her responsibility to teach us this.

Lastly, she made us take CITI training courses that are a complete waste of time because we would never need it at all, she even stated that. I've asked someone else who took this course under another professor - he never had to take it at all. Basically she wasted an entire week of lecture on a useless online training course that would not have helped us at all without understanding of this course and was incredibly dry and boring.

I'm in this class rn and imma be honest idk wtf is going on, she has no idea what she's teaching and the other day we literally went over the skskksks and an i oop- meme for god knows what reason, I wish I would have switched out of this class when I had the chance. She's expecting us to turn in a 40-60 page paper on top of our other classes.

Very unorganized class.. nice person but no one knows wtf is happening in this class. Like every lecture you attend will just further confuse you.. Its week 9 and everyone still doesn't know what this class even is

This class was truly a mess from start to finish. I thought about dropping like many of the other students did but I decided to stick with it. The material itself is not difficult. The homework assignments and take home tests were straight forward and graded easily. However the group project was a nightmare.

The project originally required each person in a group to write ten pages about a two minute section from an interview conducted by the group. The TAs actually got together and begged the professor to lower the word count because it was so outrageous. The final project guidelines changed up until week 9. On top of this, we were expected to do a heavy amount of reading which barely contributed to the actual work so no one bothered. The project ended up being graded easily but the easy grade was not worth the disorganization and the stress caused by the professor. The TA’s are the only redeemable part of the course. From what I’ve heard they’re all amazing and I can vouch that my own (Yanina) was crucial in finishing this course. Overall, I wouldn’t take it again.

I am currently taking this class, and i have to say that this is absolutely one of the WORST classes I have taken here at UCLA, and I have taken econ 11 with professor Zame.
The only interesting thing about this class is the IPA, but that's about all you will actually learn thanks to the TA's, especially Sasha--a Queen!
This professor lacks organization completely, this class has no structure whatsoever and she seems to have no idea how to lecture. This class is a mediocre disgrace to anthropology and it lacks any real tangibility. You don't learn a damn thing other than the fact that some professors still collect homework during lecture for 20 minutes.
The group project is horrible, she didn't even have the guidelines up until week 5 and she wants to talk about "we have no midterm or final" OF COURSE WE DONT, AND WE SHOULDN'T. WE HAVE 5 WEEKS TO DO A WHOLE RESEARCH PROJECT (INTERVIEWS, PROPOSALS, 30 PAGE PAPER) ON TOP OF ALL OF OUR OTHER CLASSES THAT ALSO REQUIRE PAPERS, EXAMS, AND FINALS.
Don't take this class AT ALL. I honestly don't even know how the department let this be a class, and i still don't even know what i'm suppose to get out of this class.
Goodluck Charlie

The most important thing to know about this class is that you can never show up without water because THIS CLASS IS DRY. By far the most boring class I've ever attended in all my years. One of those classes where they treat everyday phenomena like revolutionary breakthroughs because they write their observations on paper and give it a name. But it was an easy A where you could stop attending lectures after Week 2 and never (and I do mean never) have to do the readings because they don't test you on the material. You are basically a pawn in this professor's research. When she isn't giving boring lectures she's just telling you how to conduct you "research".

The class concept is really interesting, but I'm not sure how much I actually learned. Some of the readings were really eye-opening and engaging, but others were super boring... fortunately you can get away with not really reading them. I had an amazing teaching assistant (Hannah Carlan)--highly would recommend because she clarified everything and summarized it well, although I've heard all of the TA's are great. Professor Mendoza-Denton was an alright lecturer, but lecture isn't super necessary, especially if you have a great TA.

Although I came out of this class with a good grade, it was so boring. No even half the class would show up to lectures and the lectures were unstructured and confusing. The workload is easy but the content is lagging. Only take this class if you are desperate.

One of the easiest classes I have ever taken at UCLA.

Bullshit class. Writing a final essay right now about a district in LA and how our urban planning affects the cultures there or some shit, and how that can be linked to their languages, cultures, etc. Can't even find info on google, where do you expect me to get this information. I'm a bisecon major I don't care about this stuff. Take it if you want free time and an easy A but there's gonna be a little assignment that sucks ass every 2-3 weeks and a final paper that's gonna take me 3 hours to write but the topic is so boring its a drag.