Michele Moe
Department of English Composition
AD
4.1
Overall Rating
Based on 86 Users
Easiness 3.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.1 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.1 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Participation Matters
  • Has Group Projects
  • Needs Textbook
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Gives Extra Credit
  • Would Take Again
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
46.0%
38.4%
30.7%
23.0%
15.3%
7.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

47.5%
39.6%
31.7%
23.8%
15.8%
7.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

47.7%
39.8%
31.8%
23.9%
15.9%
8.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

37.5%
31.3%
25.0%
18.8%
12.5%
6.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

55.7%
46.4%
37.2%
27.9%
18.6%
9.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

59.0%
49.1%
39.3%
29.5%
19.7%
9.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

47.6%
39.7%
31.7%
23.8%
15.9%
7.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

39.5%
32.9%
26.4%
19.8%
13.2%
6.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

42.2%
35.2%
28.1%
21.1%
14.1%
7.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

53.8%
44.9%
35.9%
26.9%
17.9%
9.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

48.8%
40.7%
32.5%
24.4%
16.3%
8.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

46.5%
38.8%
31.0%
23.3%
15.5%
7.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

27.8%
23.1%
18.5%
13.9%
9.3%
4.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

45.9%
38.3%
30.6%
23.0%
15.3%
7.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

63.6%
53.0%
42.4%
31.8%
21.2%
10.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

37.2%
31.0%
24.8%
18.6%
12.4%
6.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

42.9%
35.7%
28.6%
21.4%
14.3%
7.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

32.8%
27.3%
21.9%
16.4%
10.9%
5.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

35.3%
29.4%
23.5%
17.6%
11.8%
5.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

34.4%
28.6%
22.9%
17.2%
11.5%
5.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

46.2%
38.5%
30.8%
23.1%
15.4%
7.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

50.0%
41.7%
33.3%
25.0%
16.7%
8.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

27.3%
22.7%
18.2%
13.6%
9.1%
4.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

34.1%
28.4%
22.7%
17.0%
11.4%
5.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

38.5%
32.1%
25.6%
19.2%
12.8%
6.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

41.5%
34.6%
27.6%
20.7%
13.8%
6.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

30.2%
25.2%
20.2%
15.1%
10.1%
5.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

34.9%
29.1%
23.3%
17.4%
11.6%
5.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

38.5%
32.1%
25.6%
19.2%
12.8%
6.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

37.2%
31.0%
24.8%
18.6%
12.4%
6.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

35.7%
29.8%
23.8%
17.9%
11.9%
6.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

28.6%
23.8%
19.0%
14.3%
9.5%
4.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

38.5%
32.1%
25.6%
19.2%
12.8%
6.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

40.4%
33.7%
27.0%
20.2%
13.5%
6.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

47.4%
39.5%
31.6%
23.7%
15.8%
7.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

27.1%
22.6%
18.1%
13.6%
9.0%
4.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (67)

7 of 7
7 of 7
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Nov. 10, 2010

I really loved this class... It made a huge impact on how I felt about the food industry and made me think twice about what I buy at the supermarket....
Dr. Moe is an extremely nice teacher and makes herself easily available...
YES... she gives daily quizzes on the reading but they are OPEN NOTE... the quizzes are super easy if you read what was assigned.
Class is made up of discussion ... and Dr. Moe is very informed about this topic making it a really interesting class
There are NO MIDTERMS OR FINALS.... just two essays
and there are two group projects but they aren't too difficult... its basically watching documentaries (Food inc, and The Cove and answering a few questions about them)
It is NOT impossible to get an A... AT ALL... she is a fair grader.

If you want to be more informed about what you eat I'd take this class... you'll be surprised at the process the industry goes through to give us the food we eat...

I recommend it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Nov. 2, 2010

WARNING!!!!!!! I had this professor for eng comp 3 and it was the worst experience EVER!!!! She gives you an overwhelming amount of reading during the weekend as well as in the two day period from tuesday to thursday. Minimum of 120 pages, plus films to watch, a one-page paper on what you saw and read, quizzes everyday without breaks about all the items mentioned, very subjective in the papers (Midterm paper 30 percent and final 40 percent and the rest participation and presentation). The presentation was pretty stupid since the topic was watch a movie that contained a food theme and when she grades the presentation, she does not provide a rubric but gives you whatever she feels like. Even on the papers we have to do, she gives you whatever grade depending on her mood. PLEASE DO NOT TAKE HER CLASS unless your an attractive white guy beccause she loves to hit on them. IDK why, but thats creepy and tends to put down certain minority groups like females, blacks, people from the ghetto, asians, and latinos. My friends and I who took the class felt very offended how she overlooked at us and let the white guys answer the questions for us and thus our participation grade was low. I ended up with a B plus and some of my white guy friends got A minus or above.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Aug. 17, 2010

The most unreasonable professor i have had. she does not give any reading from thursday to tuesday but forces you to read 80 pages in the 2 day period between tuesday and thursday. She is not a fair grader. She does not curve and its impossible to get an A. Unless you are really interested in reading about animal cruelty, and why fast foods are bad go ahead but dont expect an A. My advise pick a different professor.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
July 12, 2010

A very nice teacher with a good subject (food), but she gives quizzes that are really hard to work through, she sometimes gives crazy amount of readings to do, there is no real focus on writing, and its almost impossible to get an A.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 14, 2010

Not a fair grader and does not give like ANY A's. Subject may be interesting but don't expect any higher than a B

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 29, 2010

This class was definitely interesting in terms of the subject. I really enjoyed all the readings that were required, which were all on food. She gave random quizzes though from really nit-picked information so we were basically forced to read but the load was really not that bad. Professor Moe basically talks about her life stories for half of the class, and the other half she talks about her interpretation of the readings which is generally interesting in my opinion. The essays however were tricky. We had two essays for this class, with pretty interesting topics. However, writing them would not be that bad, except when she gave us back our rough draft, she would be really ambiguous about her feedback. We were required to have one on one sessions after she gave us back our rough draft which would be REALLY awkward. She's super lively in class but in those one on one sessions she was just really weird and quiet and completely unhelpful Seriously, in that 10 minutes, all she would do is ask so what do YOU think you can do to improve this essay? But anyway, it's really not that bad. Its not an easy A class, that's for sure. Overall, interesting topics, manageable workload, but you have to work hard on those essays.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Nov. 20, 2009

Enjoyed her class. Our topic was on Food so the articles and readings were all interesting. However, the amount of reading we would be assigned was a bit much at times. She isn't an easy A. Don't expect to get an A in her class. She's a great professor and very articulate, but if you want the easy way out, it isn't this class. We have quizzes every class based on the readings that were assigned. If you really want to gain an enjoyable experience then this class is good for you, but if you can care less about truly intelligent professor and want to opt for the easy A then I'd go with someone else.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Nov. 10, 2010

I really loved this class... It made a huge impact on how I felt about the food industry and made me think twice about what I buy at the supermarket....
Dr. Moe is an extremely nice teacher and makes herself easily available...
YES... she gives daily quizzes on the reading but they are OPEN NOTE... the quizzes are super easy if you read what was assigned.
Class is made up of discussion ... and Dr. Moe is very informed about this topic making it a really interesting class
There are NO MIDTERMS OR FINALS.... just two essays
and there are two group projects but they aren't too difficult... its basically watching documentaries (Food inc, and The Cove and answering a few questions about them)
It is NOT impossible to get an A... AT ALL... she is a fair grader.

If you want to be more informed about what you eat I'd take this class... you'll be surprised at the process the industry goes through to give us the food we eat...

I recommend it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Nov. 2, 2010

WARNING!!!!!!! I had this professor for eng comp 3 and it was the worst experience EVER!!!! She gives you an overwhelming amount of reading during the weekend as well as in the two day period from tuesday to thursday. Minimum of 120 pages, plus films to watch, a one-page paper on what you saw and read, quizzes everyday without breaks about all the items mentioned, very subjective in the papers (Midterm paper 30 percent and final 40 percent and the rest participation and presentation). The presentation was pretty stupid since the topic was watch a movie that contained a food theme and when she grades the presentation, she does not provide a rubric but gives you whatever she feels like. Even on the papers we have to do, she gives you whatever grade depending on her mood. PLEASE DO NOT TAKE HER CLASS unless your an attractive white guy beccause she loves to hit on them. IDK why, but thats creepy and tends to put down certain minority groups like females, blacks, people from the ghetto, asians, and latinos. My friends and I who took the class felt very offended how she overlooked at us and let the white guys answer the questions for us and thus our participation grade was low. I ended up with a B plus and some of my white guy friends got A minus or above.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Aug. 17, 2010

The most unreasonable professor i have had. she does not give any reading from thursday to tuesday but forces you to read 80 pages in the 2 day period between tuesday and thursday. She is not a fair grader. She does not curve and its impossible to get an A. Unless you are really interested in reading about animal cruelty, and why fast foods are bad go ahead but dont expect an A. My advise pick a different professor.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
July 12, 2010

A very nice teacher with a good subject (food), but she gives quizzes that are really hard to work through, she sometimes gives crazy amount of readings to do, there is no real focus on writing, and its almost impossible to get an A.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 14, 2010

Not a fair grader and does not give like ANY A's. Subject may be interesting but don't expect any higher than a B

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 29, 2010

This class was definitely interesting in terms of the subject. I really enjoyed all the readings that were required, which were all on food. She gave random quizzes though from really nit-picked information so we were basically forced to read but the load was really not that bad. Professor Moe basically talks about her life stories for half of the class, and the other half she talks about her interpretation of the readings which is generally interesting in my opinion. The essays however were tricky. We had two essays for this class, with pretty interesting topics. However, writing them would not be that bad, except when she gave us back our rough draft, she would be really ambiguous about her feedback. We were required to have one on one sessions after she gave us back our rough draft which would be REALLY awkward. She's super lively in class but in those one on one sessions she was just really weird and quiet and completely unhelpful Seriously, in that 10 minutes, all she would do is ask so what do YOU think you can do to improve this essay? But anyway, it's really not that bad. Its not an easy A class, that's for sure. Overall, interesting topics, manageable workload, but you have to work hard on those essays.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Nov. 20, 2009

Enjoyed her class. Our topic was on Food so the articles and readings were all interesting. However, the amount of reading we would be assigned was a bit much at times. She isn't an easy A. Don't expect to get an A in her class. She's a great professor and very articulate, but if you want the easy way out, it isn't this class. We have quizzes every class based on the readings that were assigned. If you really want to gain an enjoyable experience then this class is good for you, but if you can care less about truly intelligent professor and want to opt for the easy A then I'd go with someone else.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
7 of 7
4.1
Overall Rating
Based on 86 Users
Easiness 3.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.1 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.1 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Participation Matters
    (41)
  • Has Group Projects
    (35)
  • Needs Textbook
    (29)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (28)
  • Gives Extra Credit
    (33)
  • Would Take Again
    (30)
ADS

Report Review

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!