Mark Johnson
Department of Philosophy
AD
3.5
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
52.9%
44.1%
35.3%
26.5%
17.6%
8.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

85.7%
71.4%
57.1%
42.9%
28.6%
14.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

100.0%
83.3%
66.7%
50.0%
33.3%
16.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

33.3%
27.8%
22.2%
16.7%
11.1%
5.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: NR
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 10, 2024

This was the second philosophy class I'd ever taken and as a result, it was definitely the most time consuming class in my schedule. Despite it being an upper div, around half the class didn't have experience with philosophy and didn't know how to write a philosophy paper. My TA was Dan Ranweiler and he was extremely helpful in learning how to write the papers, but without him I likely would've been lost. Johnson is a passionate professor but often goes on tangents during class and isn't very good at clarifying the material or philosopher's thoughts. Moreover, the material is interesting but I would advise anyone signing up for the class to make sure they are in a good state of mind if they decide to take it. Learning about evil for 10 weeks can be mentally exhausting and I often found myself feeling a bit depressed throughout the duration of the class. Johnson also has a clear affinity for Nietzsche so he would oftentimes try to push his ideas, even in the weeks where we weren't reading him. Overall, this class definitely improved my critical thinking skills and I have come out of it retaining some optimism (I don't believe human nature is cruel) but it's a lot of work and the reading can be very emotionally heavy so I would advise anyone to proceed with caution.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: N/A
March 26, 2023

Professor Johnson grades strictly, but his comments are helpful if you are looking to improve your writing. He doesn’t mind if you walk in late. For his papers, you need to know two philosophers covered in the first half of the quarter, and at least one covered in the second half. He is down to earth, and accepts late submissions. His lectures are fairly entertaining, but he can go on tangents if students repeatedly raise their hands to comment.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: NR
Dec. 10, 2024

This was the second philosophy class I'd ever taken and as a result, it was definitely the most time consuming class in my schedule. Despite it being an upper div, around half the class didn't have experience with philosophy and didn't know how to write a philosophy paper. My TA was Dan Ranweiler and he was extremely helpful in learning how to write the papers, but without him I likely would've been lost. Johnson is a passionate professor but often goes on tangents during class and isn't very good at clarifying the material or philosopher's thoughts. Moreover, the material is interesting but I would advise anyone signing up for the class to make sure they are in a good state of mind if they decide to take it. Learning about evil for 10 weeks can be mentally exhausting and I often found myself feeling a bit depressed throughout the duration of the class. Johnson also has a clear affinity for Nietzsche so he would oftentimes try to push his ideas, even in the weeks where we weren't reading him. Overall, this class definitely improved my critical thinking skills and I have come out of it retaining some optimism (I don't believe human nature is cruel) but it's a lot of work and the reading can be very emotionally heavy so I would advise anyone to proceed with caution.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: N/A
March 26, 2023

Professor Johnson grades strictly, but his comments are helpful if you are looking to improve your writing. He doesn’t mind if you walk in late. For his papers, you need to know two philosophers covered in the first half of the quarter, and at least one covered in the second half. He is down to earth, and accepts late submissions. His lectures are fairly entertaining, but he can go on tangents if students repeatedly raise their hands to comment.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.5
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!