Huppin is an extraordinary professor!
Really, even if you do not possess an interest in law/legal studies you will be motivated by him.
He motivates students to think for themselves and come to rational conclusions with the evidence and knowledge given. Taking his class will be an asset for you in your daily life and the way that you analyze situations.
Really, he is a gleaming professor in the dulling Communications department at UCLA.
I feel as if my experience in his class is a treasure, as he said himself, in the years to come your favorite professors may not remain. Go for a spin!

huppin is a decent professor. i'm not quite so sure why his reviews are so glowing. he's a great person, there's no doubt in my mind about that and he would make a great friend as well. it is also quite clear that he is an intelligent individual. unfortunately, his communication style can be... boring at times. he speaks in a sort of monotone voice that drags on. not exactly exciting to listen to. his tests for 146 are multiple choice only and some of the questions are worded vaguely, which is supposedly meant to make us think more critically. i disagree with this concept however, as the purpose of a multiple choice midterm is more towards seeing whether or not we know the information, not whether or not we can actually interpret what the question is asking. be sure to pay attention to the facts and figures he gives you because you just can't be sure which ones will be asked of you on the tests. i think this class could be a lot better if the tests were short answer format, asking us to discuss the ramifications of the studies we read in class rather than having us memorize minute details that we would forget not long after taking the exam anyway. actually having us think critically would be a far more constructive way of learning concepts in a way that we can apply in real life. i literally took the exam a week ago and i've already forgotten the majority of the material. that doesn't happen when we have to think about a topic in a coherent manner. unfortunately, we were simply asked to regurgitate.

I really enjoyed Professor Huppin's first amendment law class. We only met once a week: on Monday nights for three hours. There were two monday holidays this quarter, and the midterm and final were administered during lecture time, so the grand total of lectures was 6. During these six lectures, he laid out the basic doctrines and fundamentals of first amendment law, and used past cases for evidence. It was a really interesting class because the cases were pertinent to society now, and taking the class helped me better understand the true limits of "free speech." This class was very easy, no textbook required (just a couple of court cases from online to read every week), no homework, only the midterm (45%) and the final (55%) were counted. He also posts all of his lecture slides, and hosts a midterm and final review session, making studying much easier! Overall, if you are interested in first amendment law, and not looking to be overwhelmed, I highly recommend this class!

Professor Huppin is great! His lectures are very thorough and clear. He really wants you to understand the material.

He is very welcoming and approachable. He invites students to go to office hours and talk about law school or anything else he can help with.

As far as the class goes, there is a paper and midterm and final. The paper is fairly easy. You just need to semi try and you will receive full credit. He purposely designs it so about half of the class gets 9/10 points.

The midterm and final come straight from lecture. Attending lecture is extremely beneficial.

Another plus, he has review sessions before the midterm and final!!

So, I am a graduating senior and this is not only the best class, but also the best professor. Yes, I did do well in the class, but even if I was getting a c in this class, I would still leave this review. I was one of those students who would email the professor a lot asking for help and he was just so patient and so helpful. I really was surprised, I had never met a professor like him. He is super caring of his students and he will give you an opportunity to boost your grade. I MEAN THIS! I don't know what else to say to express how good of a professor he is, but I will DEFINATELY take another class with him next quarter. Oh and it was a class that was only hour 15, which was very well crafted. I have tooken a class that was similar and it was 3 hours , but I preferred the one hour version more. Thank you professor !!!

Huppin is probably one of the smartest professors in the Comm department but that can also be his weakness. I found myself lost a lot of the time because he would speak very quickly and assume the class knew a lot of information. The reading was also very dense and the class definitely deterred me from even thinking about law school. Even though I ended up with an A-, you really have to commit to this class, listen closely and take thorough notes.

In terms of class material, I did learn a lot because Huppin makes it relevant to current real-life issues and you don't feel like you are learning random theoretical principles like a lot of comm classes. He also stays very unbiased when talking about issues and loves student feedback which was very engaging.

Huppin is also very nice that has knowledge in a lot of areas so i would also take advantage of his office hours.

I have had the pleasure of taking two courses with Professor Huppin and I highly recommend taking one of his classes. This class consisted of two short papers, a multiple choice midterm, and a multiple choice final. The lectures are all very interesting and he always ties in contemporary events with each topic. He is helpful in office hours and his tests are very straightforward. If you do all of the readings and attend the lectures, you should be able to earn a solid grade. One of the better professors I have had in the Communication Studies Department at UCLA.

Huppin is great. Take him if you can!

This class was really tough. I didn't have much of a background in legal communication before the class, and it really hurt me. The curve for this class matters greatly, and since a majority of my classmates seemed to step out of Harvard Law, they aced every test while I struggled to stay near the average.

The midterm relied HEAVILY on multiple choice questions from the course reader and cases we didn't talk about in class. Know everything. Read it over and over. The short answers were common sense.

For the final, he switched the test, made the multiple choice questions super easy and mostly from lecture, and made the short answer questions tough. For the final you need to memorize all of the "tests" and lists (you'll know when you get to the material) and know specific cases from lecture and the textbook that could back up your arguments.

Huppin was a good lecturer, but thank god I am done with having him as a teacher. Way too stressful for this Communication major. Never before had I cried with happiness for an A-.

I really recommend this class!
Strengths: Professor really does do a great job of engaging with his students and allowing the discussions take a natural flow. I was very comfortable seeking help, and I always felt that my input was welcome. I felt that I learned material that is very applicable outside of the course. In addition, it was really cool that Professor makes an effort to learn everybody's name. This creates a sense of importance and validation for the student, which is vital.
Weaknesses: Tests are pretty tough!