Professor

Mario Biagioli

AD
2.0
Overall Ratings
Based on 1 User
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 1.0 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 1.0 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
COMM 188A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Dec. 11, 2021
Quarter: Fall 2021
Grade: A

This review is actually for Comm 168 with Biagioli. Bruh this class was hard lowkey. The breakdown was 30% midterm 40% final and 30% reading reflections. The reading reflections were ~300 word responses based on that week's reading. While the reading itself was not too long/hard, the professor was extremely unclear with his expectations. At the beginning of the quarter he framed these reflections as reading summaries. He also never gave us heads up about the due dates or anything which were always incorrect on CCLE. I eventually figured out what he was looking for in the reflections during week 5 (I started using the IRAC method) and started getting 3/3. The final was also very unreasonable. It was a take home final (open for 24 hours ) and it literally took me like 8 hours. The professor made himself available for the first 30 minutes the test was open and after that said that he would be unreachable. Overall this class was not too bad, but I just wish that he had been more transparent and explained things better for us

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COMM 188A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Fall 2021
Grade: A
Dec. 11, 2021

This review is actually for Comm 168 with Biagioli. Bruh this class was hard lowkey. The breakdown was 30% midterm 40% final and 30% reading reflections. The reading reflections were ~300 word responses based on that week's reading. While the reading itself was not too long/hard, the professor was extremely unclear with his expectations. At the beginning of the quarter he framed these reflections as reading summaries. He also never gave us heads up about the due dates or anything which were always incorrect on CCLE. I eventually figured out what he was looking for in the reflections during week 5 (I started using the IRAC method) and started getting 3/3. The final was also very unreasonable. It was a take home final (open for 24 hours ) and it literally took me like 8 hours. The professor made himself available for the first 30 minutes the test was open and after that said that he would be unreachable. Overall this class was not too bad, but I just wish that he had been more transparent and explained things better for us

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!