- Home
- Search
- Lynn Vavreck
- CLUSTER 60A
AD
Based on 11 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides
- Engaging Lectures
- Often Funny
- Would Take Again
- Tolerates Tardiness
- Needs Textbook
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
Your grade in this class heavily depends on your TA! For the Fall portion of this cluster, your grade mainly consists of your midterm (an in-class essay), a commercial analysis paper, and a book analysis paper. Your TA grades all of these, so make sure that you form a good relationship with them and go to their office hours in order to make your papers as seamless as possible!
There are 4 professors that teach this class, my favorite one being Professor Vavreck, who is super concise and straightforward about the information she presents to you. The other professors are also great, and I highly recommend attending each lecture in order to completely understand the context of the situations you will be writing about.
Overall, this portion of the cluster was not bad, though it was definitely a lot of work to get through. I would mainly recommend this class in order to secure 6 units and to knock off some GEs.
Taking this cluster is one of my best experiences here at UCLA. For those of you who are deciding whether or not to take this class: there will be 2 lectures (75 minutes each) and 1 discussion (1h50min, ik it's long). There will be 2 essays (poli sci 30% + English literature 30%), a midterm (20%), and discussion score. For 60A, there is no final, but for 60B, there is no midterm but a final that is cumulative. Now I've finished taking 60B, and I'm grateful for how much I learned from this class. This class is really interesting and enriching if you are interested in this period, but the workload can also be pretty big (that's expected for a 6-unit cluster, though). Personally I think if you are a humanities/social science and good at writing, go for it. But if you are a STEM person and hate reading/writing, you would probably have to spend more time considering whether to take this class and going over other reviews. Here are some suggestions: (a) I don't do the reading ever since week 2. Trust me you don't have to do the reading because professors will cover all you need to know during the lectures; b) go to lectures and take notes; c) your essay scores are TA-dependent, so go to their office hours and ask for suggestions; d) some TAs are strict about grading participation in discussions but some are not, but I would say participate; e) for each of the professor: Vavreck (polisci) is clear and interesting and organized; Avila (history) is clear but sometimes boring; Fink (music) is really interesting but sometimes unclear; Decker (English) is the most boring prof, but try to stick to his lectures as he is also knowledgable.
i overall really liked this quarter of this particular cluster. i thought that it was a great way 2 start my freshman year at the university of california, los angeles and that the lecs were super engaging. admittedly, the lecs were a bit early 4 me (held tuesdays and thursdays from 9:30 am - 10:45 am) through no fault of the professors in question but they luckily were held on the hill at the de neve auditorium so if u live in the dormitories (especially de neve) ur in luck!! although i did miss quite a few lectures (participation not mandatory), i still was always able 2 feel prepared 4 discussion (1 hr and 45 min where participation is mandatory) by doing the readings. although the readings 4 each week r definitely excessive, especially since this is a ge course (although its 2 b expected 4 a cluster ofc) this can easily be combatted by just skimming them (in some cases i would literally just read the first and last page of a reading to get a better understanding of what it was about) or, in the case of assigned videos, watching them in 2x speed (available feature on canvas!) or otherwise by j putting them on in the background while doing other hw (idk if this really works... but i definitely resorted 2 this on multiple occasions). exams r made 2 seem way harder then they actually r, j review key concepts from the class and b well prepared 4 the music portion of them (there r alrdy many study playlists available on spotify although the course material may change somewhat if the course is offered again in the future) - u don't need 2 know any dates which makes things a lot ezer. reading assignments r do every week but these r super ez. there r also a couple papers if i remember correctly but these r also easily doable as long as u manage ur time wisely, as w any class!! there is 1 mandatory movie viewing not held during lecture hrs. it takes place in the evening and is ez to get an excuse 4 but is also pretty entertaining so i wld honestly recommend going if ur sched allows 4 it. prof vavreck's lecs in particular were supes good. she was always enthusiastic and energetic when presenting although this passion sometimes resulted in us being let out late, after the norm dismissal time. high recommend if u can (espec if ur a stem major as its a great way 2 knock out 4 ges in 1 go!!)!!
This class is the main reason I was extremely stressed during the fall and winter quarters. Every Wednesday night I was staying up until 4-ish AM just to finish all the readings, which didn't even feel relevant to the lectures.
However, I felt that the class itself had very interesting material. Despite hurting both my mental health and my sleep schedule, I would take this class again because the lectures were genuinely interesting.
OK the 60s Cluster is pretty difficult but Vavreck is a gem among the teaching staff. I found it really hard to engage with most of the other professor's lectures the majority of the time, but Vavreck's were always good. As a whole the class was a lot of work and if I hadn't had the rigorous English teachers in high school that I did I think it would've been a lot harder. What can make the class difficult is that there is a bunch of material every week to go through (readings and recordings) before discussion. The Thursday webinars are interesting to listen to, but honestly never helped me with writing a paper or even synthesizing the information. The discussions sections are probably the most helpful part. Seriously if you don't know what to do about an essay go make an appointment with the writing consultant or schedule a meeting with your TA to go over stuff.
Vavreck was my favorite out of the four professors! She teaches the political science portion of the class, and I definitely found her material the most interesting. She's also a pretty esteemed person outside of UCLA. I would have loved to take a class of hers outside this cluster.
Okay honestly, compared to other clusters, this cluster is NOT that bad at all. It's perfect for STEM majors that want to knock out 4 GEs (Literary, Visual, Historical, Social) but don't want to be bored to death. Attendance is not required/taken during lecture, but the lectures aren't posted online so I recommend taking the extra step to just go every lecture so that you're not making up for it later. I took this class because it seemed like the fun cluster, with music and politics, but don't forget about the history and English aspects! Professor Decker, who teaches the Literature, Film/TV lectures is so dull, but I'm surprised I haven't fallen asleep alongside my friends. His voice is very monotone and he often goes off on unrelated tangents that stray away from what he is trying to say. He means well, but sometimes it's hard to focus on the words he says when you've just woken up. Professor Reiff is only slightly more interesting because she sometimes discusses interesting topics, but most of the time its just a bunch of words - like full-on paragraphs - on a lecture slide and before you know it class is over and you have no recollection of what she said. The best Professors are Vavreck and Fink because they like to engage with the class with questions or opinions, they seem excited and awake, and they make jokes as best as they can. There is no final for this class, only a midterm, and the TAs usually prepare their sections pretty well with what to expect. The Literature Paper and Political Science polling paper are designed to be vague and open-ended, so just remember to specify your topic a little bit and make sure you have something to say, theme-wise. Overall, I didn't think I was going to get an A because I'm not that great at papers...and also because they never posted the grades for the assignments online....but anyway it's possible!
Your grade in this class heavily depends on your TA! For the Fall portion of this cluster, your grade mainly consists of your midterm (an in-class essay), a commercial analysis paper, and a book analysis paper. Your TA grades all of these, so make sure that you form a good relationship with them and go to their office hours in order to make your papers as seamless as possible!
There are 4 professors that teach this class, my favorite one being Professor Vavreck, who is super concise and straightforward about the information she presents to you. The other professors are also great, and I highly recommend attending each lecture in order to completely understand the context of the situations you will be writing about.
Overall, this portion of the cluster was not bad, though it was definitely a lot of work to get through. I would mainly recommend this class in order to secure 6 units and to knock off some GEs.
Taking this cluster is one of my best experiences here at UCLA. For those of you who are deciding whether or not to take this class: there will be 2 lectures (75 minutes each) and 1 discussion (1h50min, ik it's long). There will be 2 essays (poli sci 30% + English literature 30%), a midterm (20%), and discussion score. For 60A, there is no final, but for 60B, there is no midterm but a final that is cumulative. Now I've finished taking 60B, and I'm grateful for how much I learned from this class. This class is really interesting and enriching if you are interested in this period, but the workload can also be pretty big (that's expected for a 6-unit cluster, though). Personally I think if you are a humanities/social science and good at writing, go for it. But if you are a STEM person and hate reading/writing, you would probably have to spend more time considering whether to take this class and going over other reviews. Here are some suggestions: (a) I don't do the reading ever since week 2. Trust me you don't have to do the reading because professors will cover all you need to know during the lectures; b) go to lectures and take notes; c) your essay scores are TA-dependent, so go to their office hours and ask for suggestions; d) some TAs are strict about grading participation in discussions but some are not, but I would say participate; e) for each of the professor: Vavreck (polisci) is clear and interesting and organized; Avila (history) is clear but sometimes boring; Fink (music) is really interesting but sometimes unclear; Decker (English) is the most boring prof, but try to stick to his lectures as he is also knowledgable.
i overall really liked this quarter of this particular cluster. i thought that it was a great way 2 start my freshman year at the university of california, los angeles and that the lecs were super engaging. admittedly, the lecs were a bit early 4 me (held tuesdays and thursdays from 9:30 am - 10:45 am) through no fault of the professors in question but they luckily were held on the hill at the de neve auditorium so if u live in the dormitories (especially de neve) ur in luck!! although i did miss quite a few lectures (participation not mandatory), i still was always able 2 feel prepared 4 discussion (1 hr and 45 min where participation is mandatory) by doing the readings. although the readings 4 each week r definitely excessive, especially since this is a ge course (although its 2 b expected 4 a cluster ofc) this can easily be combatted by just skimming them (in some cases i would literally just read the first and last page of a reading to get a better understanding of what it was about) or, in the case of assigned videos, watching them in 2x speed (available feature on canvas!) or otherwise by j putting them on in the background while doing other hw (idk if this really works... but i definitely resorted 2 this on multiple occasions). exams r made 2 seem way harder then they actually r, j review key concepts from the class and b well prepared 4 the music portion of them (there r alrdy many study playlists available on spotify although the course material may change somewhat if the course is offered again in the future) - u don't need 2 know any dates which makes things a lot ezer. reading assignments r do every week but these r super ez. there r also a couple papers if i remember correctly but these r also easily doable as long as u manage ur time wisely, as w any class!! there is 1 mandatory movie viewing not held during lecture hrs. it takes place in the evening and is ez to get an excuse 4 but is also pretty entertaining so i wld honestly recommend going if ur sched allows 4 it. prof vavreck's lecs in particular were supes good. she was always enthusiastic and energetic when presenting although this passion sometimes resulted in us being let out late, after the norm dismissal time. high recommend if u can (espec if ur a stem major as its a great way 2 knock out 4 ges in 1 go!!)!!
This class is the main reason I was extremely stressed during the fall and winter quarters. Every Wednesday night I was staying up until 4-ish AM just to finish all the readings, which didn't even feel relevant to the lectures.
However, I felt that the class itself had very interesting material. Despite hurting both my mental health and my sleep schedule, I would take this class again because the lectures were genuinely interesting.
OK the 60s Cluster is pretty difficult but Vavreck is a gem among the teaching staff. I found it really hard to engage with most of the other professor's lectures the majority of the time, but Vavreck's were always good. As a whole the class was a lot of work and if I hadn't had the rigorous English teachers in high school that I did I think it would've been a lot harder. What can make the class difficult is that there is a bunch of material every week to go through (readings and recordings) before discussion. The Thursday webinars are interesting to listen to, but honestly never helped me with writing a paper or even synthesizing the information. The discussions sections are probably the most helpful part. Seriously if you don't know what to do about an essay go make an appointment with the writing consultant or schedule a meeting with your TA to go over stuff.
Vavreck was my favorite out of the four professors! She teaches the political science portion of the class, and I definitely found her material the most interesting. She's also a pretty esteemed person outside of UCLA. I would have loved to take a class of hers outside this cluster.
Okay honestly, compared to other clusters, this cluster is NOT that bad at all. It's perfect for STEM majors that want to knock out 4 GEs (Literary, Visual, Historical, Social) but don't want to be bored to death. Attendance is not required/taken during lecture, but the lectures aren't posted online so I recommend taking the extra step to just go every lecture so that you're not making up for it later. I took this class because it seemed like the fun cluster, with music and politics, but don't forget about the history and English aspects! Professor Decker, who teaches the Literature, Film/TV lectures is so dull, but I'm surprised I haven't fallen asleep alongside my friends. His voice is very monotone and he often goes off on unrelated tangents that stray away from what he is trying to say. He means well, but sometimes it's hard to focus on the words he says when you've just woken up. Professor Reiff is only slightly more interesting because she sometimes discusses interesting topics, but most of the time its just a bunch of words - like full-on paragraphs - on a lecture slide and before you know it class is over and you have no recollection of what she said. The best Professors are Vavreck and Fink because they like to engage with the class with questions or opinions, they seem excited and awake, and they make jokes as best as they can. There is no final for this class, only a midterm, and the TAs usually prepare their sections pretty well with what to expect. The Literature Paper and Political Science polling paper are designed to be vague and open-ended, so just remember to specify your topic a little bit and make sure you have something to say, theme-wise. Overall, I didn't think I was going to get an A because I'm not that great at papers...and also because they never posted the grades for the assignments online....but anyway it's possible!
Based on 11 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides (7)
- Engaging Lectures (8)
- Often Funny (7)
- Would Take Again (7)
- Tolerates Tardiness (6)
- Needs Textbook (6)