Laurie K Hart
Department of Global Studies
AD
2.3
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 2.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.7 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Tough Tests
  • Participation Matters
  • Has Group Projects
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: B
June 8, 2019

Hart is a HORRIBLE lecturer. She literally is all over the place with her lectures. There is absolutely no sense of cohesion or some sort of narrative in her lectures. She talks about random case studies and random ideas and nothing makes any sense. And her tests are way too long for the time allotted and the paper prompts literally make no sense. Avoid taking her at ALL COSTS. One of the worst professors I have ever taken.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: B+
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
April 5, 2019

I agree with the previous review. The material was definitely interesting but Professor Hart is not a very good lecturer. She was often hard to follow at times and she spoke very broadly about concepts so it was pretty hard to make connections across a lot of them when it came time for the exams. The "study guide" she provided for both the midterm and final consisted of a crazy long list of terms (basically everything ever mentioned in lecture), so it was hard to know and prioritize what would be most important. The exams consisted of ID terms, short answers of 3-4 sentences, and then little essays of 2-3 paragraphs. The two paper assignments were relatively easy though. The first one (2-3 pages) had us go to an exhibit at Fowler and make a connection between an artifact and one of the terms from the course. The second paper (3 pages) had us find a current event going on somewhere across the world and connect it to any concepts that were discussed in two of the readings from the course. Discussion also mattered because attendance was taken and we were assigned to groups that would then present to the class on a specific week's readings. With a different professor, I think this class has the potential to be so much better than it was for us this past quarter.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: B+
April 4, 2019

There's so much potential (especially in this course!) for the material to be interesting and at times Hart hits the mark but, put quite simply, Hart is a BAD LECTURER.
The class includes 1 midterm, discussion participation, 2 essays, and a final.
The midterm and essays are relatively essay.
Discussion ranges by TA...some are tough graders so beware.
Final hit me hard; there was a lot of information to memorize and Hart does a bad job of clearly explaining what students should prioritize.
Consensus: Nice person, but avoid her GS 100B course if you can.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: B
June 8, 2019

Hart is a HORRIBLE lecturer. She literally is all over the place with her lectures. There is absolutely no sense of cohesion or some sort of narrative in her lectures. She talks about random case studies and random ideas and nothing makes any sense. And her tests are way too long for the time allotted and the paper prompts literally make no sense. Avoid taking her at ALL COSTS. One of the worst professors I have ever taken.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: B+
April 5, 2019

I agree with the previous review. The material was definitely interesting but Professor Hart is not a very good lecturer. She was often hard to follow at times and she spoke very broadly about concepts so it was pretty hard to make connections across a lot of them when it came time for the exams. The "study guide" she provided for both the midterm and final consisted of a crazy long list of terms (basically everything ever mentioned in lecture), so it was hard to know and prioritize what would be most important. The exams consisted of ID terms, short answers of 3-4 sentences, and then little essays of 2-3 paragraphs. The two paper assignments were relatively easy though. The first one (2-3 pages) had us go to an exhibit at Fowler and make a connection between an artifact and one of the terms from the course. The second paper (3 pages) had us find a current event going on somewhere across the world and connect it to any concepts that were discussed in two of the readings from the course. Discussion also mattered because attendance was taken and we were assigned to groups that would then present to the class on a specific week's readings. With a different professor, I think this class has the potential to be so much better than it was for us this past quarter.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: B+
April 4, 2019

There's so much potential (especially in this course!) for the material to be interesting and at times Hart hits the mark but, put quite simply, Hart is a BAD LECTURER.
The class includes 1 midterm, discussion participation, 2 essays, and a final.
The midterm and essays are relatively essay.
Discussion ranges by TA...some are tough graders so beware.
Final hit me hard; there was a lot of information to memorize and Hart does a bad job of clearly explaining what students should prioritize.
Consensus: Nice person, but avoid her GS 100B course if you can.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.3
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 2.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.7 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (3)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (3)
  • Tough Tests
    (2)
  • Participation Matters
    (2)
  • Has Group Projects
    (2)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!