Laurence C Smith
Department of Geography
AD
3.4
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.6 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.4 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 13, 2011

Course: Geography 119 (ignore 599 above; the class I took wasn't in the drop down)

I just took his new class, Geog 119, "Biophysical and Social Transformations in the Northern Regions." Although the title is a bit of a mouthful, the class was absolutely fantastic. He decided to structure it in an "experimental" way, with no exams. The focus was on two presentations each person did: a "student presentation and discussion," which was a powerpoint given with a partner intended to incite discussion with the class, and the final presentation in a larger group (4 in our case) on the last day on a topic related to the course but branching out in some way. The weekly class discussions took up at least half of the lecture period and were very fun and thought-provoking. There were weekly quizzes intended to make sure you did the reading, but if you're like me, you will WANT to do the reading. The professor teaches mostly from his own book ("The World in 2050"), which is written for general audiences so it presents information in a colorful and intriguing way. It is a significant amount of reading, but it's really worth it if you are interested in the material. So, if you're at all interested in the environmental, economic, and social future of northern countries (like Canada and Russia) and the coming changes to the arctic itself, I highly recommend this class.

Just to be clear, even though there were no exams, it was not an "easy A" class. The weekly quizzes were actually quite detailed (the professor was still working on writing good questions that weren't too difficult), and we had to turn in a weekly discussion statement about what we read (<1 page). So, reading is definitely a must. Of course, the prof is still working out the structure of the course, so any of these details could change.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 13, 2011

Course: Geography 119 (ignore 599 above; the class I took wasn't in the drop down)

I just took his new class, Geog 119, "Biophysical and Social Transformations in the Northern Regions." Although the title is a bit of a mouthful, the class was absolutely fantastic. He decided to structure it in an "experimental" way, with no exams. The focus was on two presentations each person did: a "student presentation and discussion," which was a powerpoint given with a partner intended to incite discussion with the class, and the final presentation in a larger group (4 in our case) on the last day on a topic related to the course but branching out in some way. The weekly class discussions took up at least half of the lecture period and were very fun and thought-provoking. There were weekly quizzes intended to make sure you did the reading, but if you're like me, you will WANT to do the reading. The professor teaches mostly from his own book ("The World in 2050"), which is written for general audiences so it presents information in a colorful and intriguing way. It is a significant amount of reading, but it's really worth it if you are interested in the material. So, if you're at all interested in the environmental, economic, and social future of northern countries (like Canada and Russia) and the coming changes to the arctic itself, I highly recommend this class.

Just to be clear, even though there were no exams, it was not an "easy A" class. The weekly quizzes were actually quite detailed (the professor was still working on writing good questions that weren't too difficult), and we had to turn in a weekly discussion statement about what we read (<1 page). So, reading is definitely a must. Of course, the prof is still working out the structure of the course, so any of these details could change.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.4
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.6 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.4 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!