Jingyi Jessica Li
Department of Statistics
AD
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
71.4%
59.5%
47.6%
35.7%
23.8%
11.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

48.3%
40.2%
32.2%
24.1%
16.1%
8.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
June 22, 2024

Unlike the class description in the catalog, this class is highly theoretical. Most of the lectures are of her deriving the various different models and techniques used in statistical linear modeling. In addition, she did a flipped classroom method where we watched recorded videos and then came to lecture, but the in-person lecture was basically the same as the recorded video.

Homeworks are long and tedious, with what felt like repetitive coding problems and challenging theory questions. There's a final paper/presentation worth 50% of the grade, but the rubric is not very clear. But the grading wasn't too harsh, so it balanced out.

Due to the contradiction between the class description and what's actually taught in class, I'd suggest only taking it if you want a more theoretical learning to these concepts.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: A
June 22, 2024

Unlike the class description in the catalog, this class is highly theoretical. Most of the lectures are of her deriving the various different models and techniques used in statistical linear modeling. In addition, she did a flipped classroom method where we watched recorded videos and then came to lecture, but the in-person lecture was basically the same as the recorded video.

Homeworks are long and tedious, with what felt like repetitive coding problems and challenging theory questions. There's a final paper/presentation worth 50% of the grade, but the rubric is not very clear. But the grading wasn't too harsh, so it balanced out.

Due to the contradiction between the class description and what's actually taught in class, I'd suggest only taking it if you want a more theoretical learning to these concepts.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!