Professor

Jeremy Smoak

AD
3.9
Overall Ratings
Based on 146 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 2.7 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 4.1 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (146)

3 of 10
3 of 10
Add your review...
Sept. 27, 2012
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

Took 10W. Smoak is good at talking, but THIS IS NOT AN EASY CLASS! YOU HAVE TO DO A LOT OF WORK AND RESEARCH FOR THE ESSAYS! DON'T PLAN ON THIS CLASS BEING AN EASY A. That being said, take him during the spring, NOT FALL quarter. He is more laid back after the Fall quarter.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Feb. 22, 2012
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

Best teacher at UCLA, hands down!!! He's a great communicator and teacher! He cares about his students. And makes it clear what he wants from his students! Take a class with Smoak, this ain't no joke!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Feb. 24, 2013
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

I've taken JS 150A, Hebrew 101A, 101B, and I must say he is one of UCLA's finest professors. He's clear as to what he expects, no surprises. His test are very fair and he's a great lecturer. He cares that you are learning and is very interesting. I would highly recommend taking Professor Smoak if possible, you won't regret it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
March 2, 2012
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

This class will forever be my favorite class of all time! Professor Smoak loves teaching Near East history. His enthusiastic lessons make it all the more enjoyable. Please take this class. You will not regret it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
March 13, 2012
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

Smoak is very straightforward and interesting. I highly recommend his class. There are no surprises, he covers everything in class. Do the readings and go to class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Sept. 26, 2010
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

Like the review below, Professor Smoak is a really good lecturer and really knows the material very well. The ratings don't really reflect that well, but honestly, his class was pretty easy aside from a writing the essays. The essays were pretty straightforward after getting feedback and help during office hours. The tests were easy-okay.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Sept. 26, 2010
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

This was my first GE I ever took and Professor Smoak is a really great lecturer. He talks fast, so I do recommend bringing a laptop and also possibly a voice recorder. His tests are really easy... as long as you've taken good notes you're golden. Also, for this class, you only really have to read the small novel-sized book. His lectures are pretty much taken from that, and the tests asks questions taken from lecture. So seriously, take good notes. And if you study them the test will be a piece of cake. The TAs are pretty good too (Eric Welles especially). I also had Professor Smoak for Jerusalem: the Holy City (a writing II) class and it was just as good. I really like learning about Mesopotamia/Egypt or anything related to the Near East. Jerusalem class gave me a better understanding of the differences between the three religions (Christianity, Islam, Jew). The essays were a bit difficult but just attend office hours to ask for help or to get some feedback before submitting the paper in. Really good class and you get a lot of value from learning this kind of material as it relates back to why we have the conflicts in our modern world today.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Dec. 16, 2010
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

I thought professor Smoak was a great professor. I sat in the front and he actually chatted with us most days before starting lecture. The midterm was easy and the essays for the class weren't bad. I would definitely recommend any class with professor Smoak because he really knows what he's talking about. His lectures were very relevant and important to go to.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Dec. 18, 2010
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

Like all of the evaluators below, I cannot stress how great of a lecturer Professor Smoak is. He makes it really easy to understand the material, and for me at least, to even enjoy the material. Which is a good thing, considering Professor Smoak doesn't post the lectures online, so actually going is really important. Also, don't be afraid to ask your TA's for help on the two essays. I don't think I would've gotten as much out of the class if I hadn't asked mine(Ryan Roberts--be happy if you get him, even Professor Smoak called him the best TA in the department). Anyway, I took the class on a whim based on the reviews below, and it was definitely worth taking. It ended up being my favorite class of the quarter. Take this for your GE!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Dec. 27, 2012
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

Course: ANE 10W

Professor Smoak may be one of the most interesting professors at UCLA. He demonstrates great enthusiasm for the course material. He understands that some of the topics may be foreign to students, but he excels at getting the themes across to each student. You know exactly when to take notes when he raises his voice to say phrases like "that emphasizes..., the authors make the case that..., what's important is..." Then you just type out whatever he says after that since you might have to use what he says for the two papers you will write.

There are some pros and cons to take away from the fact that this is a writing class.

PRO: There is only one midterm and a final. I cannot stress enough how EASY they are. Professor Smoak says it himself. He wants students to focus more on writing papers than studying for the exams. Each exam is made up of multiple choice questions. You can study the night before if you want because many of the questions are one-liners with a three-word answer. Very basic.

CON: These exams do not make up a whole lot of your grade. Again he wants students to focus on writing. If this class was graded on exams solely, then it would be considered the easiest GE.

PRO: He has PPT slides in class that are easy to take note of. Highlights the main themes from the readings. Not everything that appears on the PPT is on the exams but everything on the exams is on the slides.

CON: He does not put PPT slides on the course website. However, he does put up Study Guides of terms and dates needed for the exams.

PRO: Most information comes from the readings.

CON: There are a lot of readings but I suggest you read them (or skim) since they are long and he takes out only one or two points from like a 40-page passage.

PRO: The papers may be worth more than half of the overall grade, but don't fret. Yes, each requires research with the second one requiring much more than the first. No, they are not impossible. Simply research and research some more then use your findings and analyze.

CON: I felt this was pretty surprising but the TAs aren't so helpful. Sure they tell you that your paper should reflect and elaborate on your thesis but there really isn't much more from the TAs than that. The fact that this is a writing class makes it seem like the TAs should offer exceptional assistance in your papers but I didn't feel that way. In addition, that Hacker book - the one about writing - barely any mention of it.

Overall, it CAN be an easy GE if you feel like writing and analyzing are simple tasks. Exams are meant to be a breeze, a piece of cake, a walk in the park or whatever you want to call it (took 5 minutes to finish the 50 m/c final). Professor Smoak's delight in teaching shows in every class and he just wants the best out of you.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
NR EAST 50A
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Sept. 27, 2012

Took 10W. Smoak is good at talking, but THIS IS NOT AN EASY CLASS! YOU HAVE TO DO A LOT OF WORK AND RESEARCH FOR THE ESSAYS! DON'T PLAN ON THIS CLASS BEING AN EASY A. That being said, take him during the spring, NOT FALL quarter. He is more laid back after the Fall quarter.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
NR EAST M101B
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Feb. 22, 2012

Best teacher at UCLA, hands down!!! He's a great communicator and teacher! He cares about his students. And makes it clear what he wants from his students! Take a class with Smoak, this ain't no joke!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
NR EAST M101B
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Feb. 24, 2013

I've taken JS 150A, Hebrew 101A, 101B, and I must say he is one of UCLA's finest professors. He's clear as to what he expects, no surprises. His test are very fair and he's a great lecturer. He cares that you are learning and is very interesting. I would highly recommend taking Professor Smoak if possible, you won't regret it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
NR EAST 50A
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 2, 2012

This class will forever be my favorite class of all time! Professor Smoak loves teaching Near East history. His enthusiastic lessons make it all the more enjoyable. Please take this class. You will not regret it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
NR EAST M101B
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 13, 2012

Smoak is very straightforward and interesting. I highly recommend his class. There are no surprises, he covers everything in class. Do the readings and go to class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
NR EAST 50A
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Sept. 26, 2010

Like the review below, Professor Smoak is a really good lecturer and really knows the material very well. The ratings don't really reflect that well, but honestly, his class was pretty easy aside from a writing the essays. The essays were pretty straightforward after getting feedback and help during office hours. The tests were easy-okay.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
NR EAST 50A
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Sept. 26, 2010

This was my first GE I ever took and Professor Smoak is a really great lecturer. He talks fast, so I do recommend bringing a laptop and also possibly a voice recorder. His tests are really easy... as long as you've taken good notes you're golden. Also, for this class, you only really have to read the small novel-sized book. His lectures are pretty much taken from that, and the tests asks questions taken from lecture. So seriously, take good notes. And if you study them the test will be a piece of cake. The TAs are pretty good too (Eric Welles especially). I also had Professor Smoak for Jerusalem: the Holy City (a writing II) class and it was just as good. I really like learning about Mesopotamia/Egypt or anything related to the Near East. Jerusalem class gave me a better understanding of the differences between the three religions (Christianity, Islam, Jew). The essays were a bit difficult but just attend office hours to ask for help or to get some feedback before submitting the paper in. Really good class and you get a lot of value from learning this kind of material as it relates back to why we have the conflicts in our modern world today.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
NR EAST 50A
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 16, 2010

I thought professor Smoak was a great professor. I sat in the front and he actually chatted with us most days before starting lecture. The midterm was easy and the essays for the class weren't bad. I would definitely recommend any class with professor Smoak because he really knows what he's talking about. His lectures were very relevant and important to go to.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
NR EAST 50A
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 18, 2010

Like all of the evaluators below, I cannot stress how great of a lecturer Professor Smoak is. He makes it really easy to understand the material, and for me at least, to even enjoy the material. Which is a good thing, considering Professor Smoak doesn't post the lectures online, so actually going is really important. Also, don't be afraid to ask your TA's for help on the two essays. I don't think I would've gotten as much out of the class if I hadn't asked mine(Ryan Roberts--be happy if you get him, even Professor Smoak called him the best TA in the department). Anyway, I took the class on a whim based on the reviews below, and it was definitely worth taking. It ended up being my favorite class of the quarter. Take this for your GE!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
NR EAST 19
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 27, 2012

Course: ANE 10W

Professor Smoak may be one of the most interesting professors at UCLA. He demonstrates great enthusiasm for the course material. He understands that some of the topics may be foreign to students, but he excels at getting the themes across to each student. You know exactly when to take notes when he raises his voice to say phrases like "that emphasizes..., the authors make the case that..., what's important is..." Then you just type out whatever he says after that since you might have to use what he says for the two papers you will write.

There are some pros and cons to take away from the fact that this is a writing class.

PRO: There is only one midterm and a final. I cannot stress enough how EASY they are. Professor Smoak says it himself. He wants students to focus more on writing papers than studying for the exams. Each exam is made up of multiple choice questions. You can study the night before if you want because many of the questions are one-liners with a three-word answer. Very basic.

CON: These exams do not make up a whole lot of your grade. Again he wants students to focus on writing. If this class was graded on exams solely, then it would be considered the easiest GE.

PRO: He has PPT slides in class that are easy to take note of. Highlights the main themes from the readings. Not everything that appears on the PPT is on the exams but everything on the exams is on the slides.

CON: He does not put PPT slides on the course website. However, he does put up Study Guides of terms and dates needed for the exams.

PRO: Most information comes from the readings.

CON: There are a lot of readings but I suggest you read them (or skim) since they are long and he takes out only one or two points from like a 40-page passage.

PRO: The papers may be worth more than half of the overall grade, but don't fret. Yes, each requires research with the second one requiring much more than the first. No, they are not impossible. Simply research and research some more then use your findings and analyze.

CON: I felt this was pretty surprising but the TAs aren't so helpful. Sure they tell you that your paper should reflect and elaborate on your thesis but there really isn't much more from the TAs than that. The fact that this is a writing class makes it seem like the TAs should offer exceptional assistance in your papers but I didn't feel that way. In addition, that Hacker book - the one about writing - barely any mention of it.

Overall, it CAN be an easy GE if you feel like writing and analyzing are simple tasks. Exams are meant to be a breeze, a piece of cake, a walk in the park or whatever you want to call it (took 5 minutes to finish the 50 m/c final). Professor Smoak's delight in teaching shows in every class and he just wants the best out of you.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
3 of 10
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!