Jeffrey Louis Decker
Department of General Education Clusters
AD
3.0
Overall Rating
Based on 44 Users
Easiness 2.9 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.9 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Tolerates Tardiness
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
29.0%
24.2%
19.3%
14.5%
9.7%
4.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

42.4%
35.3%
28.2%
21.2%
14.1%
7.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

38.9%
32.4%
25.9%
19.4%
13.0%
6.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

36.3%
30.2%
24.2%
18.1%
12.1%
6.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

33.2%
27.7%
22.1%
16.6%
11.1%
5.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

29.9%
24.9%
19.9%
14.9%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

24.4%
20.3%
16.2%
12.2%
8.1%
4.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

26.6%
22.1%
17.7%
13.3%
8.9%
4.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

25.5%
21.3%
17.0%
12.8%
8.5%
4.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

28.0%
23.3%
18.6%
14.0%
9.3%
4.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

28.1%
23.4%
18.7%
14.0%
9.4%
4.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (31)

4 of 4
4 of 4
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 17, 2011

I had Decker for the 60s Cluster, both 60A and 60B. While he might be a nice person, he's not the most interesting person to listen to when he is lecturing.

I feel like he could have made his portion of the class a lot more interesting than it was, which by the way consisted of the literature and film. He also seemed to expect too much from a class of science majors that was only taking the cluster to get their GEs out of the way -- which I suppose is his right, but he seemed to get frustrated when no one had input to his questions.

His readings were occasionally interesting, but usually boring. The film clips he did show in class however, were pretty interesting. But I was SUPER disappointed when we only say the opening to the Godfather and not the whole thing.

I didn't take his seminar because I heard it was one of the more difficult ones (although I ended up in one that was pretty hard anyway) and simply because I don't think I was really that interested.

I found that while his portion of the course was one of the most interesting to me, he just had a way of talking that I just didn't enjoy listening to -- sorry Decker, it's not you, its me.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 17, 2011

I had Decker for the 60s Cluster, both 60A and 60B. While he might be a nice person, he's not the most interesting person to listen to when he is lecturing.

I feel like he could have made his portion of the class a lot more interesting than it was, which by the way consisted of the literature and film. He also seemed to expect too much from a class of science majors that was only taking the cluster to get their GEs out of the way -- which I suppose is his right, but he seemed to get frustrated when no one had input to his questions.

His readings were occasionally interesting, but usually boring. The film clips he did show in class however, were pretty interesting. But I was SUPER disappointed when we only say the opening to the Godfather and not the whole thing.

I didn't take his seminar because I heard it was one of the more difficult ones (although I ended up in one that was pretty hard anyway) and simply because I don't think I was really that interested.

I found that while his portion of the course was one of the most interesting to me, he just had a way of talking that I just didn't enjoy listening to -- sorry Decker, it's not you, its me.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
4 of 4
3.0
Overall Rating
Based on 44 Users
Easiness 2.9 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.9 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (17)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (14)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!