Professor

Jean-Paul Deguzman

AD
4.8
Overall Ratings
Based on 21 Users
Easiness 4.1 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 3.7 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 4.9 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 4.8 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (21)

1 of 2
1 of 2
Add your review...
CLUSTER 20CW
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
June 16, 2021
Quarter: Spring 2021
Grade: A

TAKE YOUR SPRING SEMINAR WITH DEGUZMAN IF YOU CAN!!!
--
Deguzman's class was definitely the highlight of my spring quarter!
He is extremely upbeat during class and keeps students very engaged. He made the three hour long seminar feel like it was a breeze. He also was very receptive to feedbacks as he gave us long breaks in our meetings.
I cannot say enough good things about the positive energy he brings to the class.
--
GRADING
I know y'all are reading this to know about grading, and I would say that you can definitely get an A in his class even if you think you are bad at writing. He only has 1 big writing assignment, which is a paper you work on throughout the quarter. He sets deadlines for parts of it so you don't get behind which was helpful because I never felt stressed about the writing ever during this class (I also heard that other spring seminars had writing every week/every other week, so if you are looking to avoid that, take this class).
With that being said, he also still greatly improves your writing. He gives detailed feedback on issues he sees with your writing, and if you appropriately address those issues and listen to his comments you will get an A. I attended his office hours for extra feedback and he would let you know what needed to be altered and he also went above and beyond and found sources for us to use in our papers which I thought was really nice and helpful.
25% Class engagement
25% Class presentation
5% List of Sources
10% Thesis and Outline
10% Rough Draft
25% Final Draft
--
I wish I was able to take him in previous quarters of this seminar, so if you get the chance definitely take this seminar.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
ASIA AM 10
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Aug. 6, 2021
Quarter: Summer 2021
Grade: A

Professor deGuzman is a great professor to begin a path in Asian American Studies, or simply fulfill a GE requirement with. Although, I did not visit lectures often, he used engaging slides, brought in guest speakers, and even simulated group discussion via Jamboard and other platforms. The way to achieving an A in his class is to always finish your paper ahead of time (1-2 days before), and schedule a private 1 on 1 session for him to review the content before submission day. If he signs off on the paper, it is an automatic 100% eyes closed. However, if your rough draft doesn't completely fly on the first try, he gives spectacular feedback which will enable you to ace the paper for sure. I even failed to complete a quiz on time, and he extended the deadline for me, meaning he is lenient on tardiness and cares about the students. He gives weekly readings, which are quizzed on. However, to be honest, the quizzes were open note, so I did not stress about reading them at all.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Nov. 29, 2016
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: N/A

Professor deGuzman is great! His lectures are easy to follow and he tries really hard to be approachable. His slides tie the readings together really clearly and as long as you go to class and do the readings, it's easy because he makes all the concepts really simple and lets you know exactly what material you have to study for the tests. That being said, it is a lot of reading, and I took this class at 8 am, so I'm suffering now for not getting out of bed for lecture a few times. Don't let yourself fall behind because this class is hard to catch up in. So, if you'll faithfully go to every class and do every reading, definitely take this class because it's super interesting/easy and he makes it all the more so. But if you're not going to consistently stay on top of it, you're going to struggle.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Sept. 26, 2016
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A

Professor deGuzman was great! The class wasn't too hard, and the sections were actually worthwhile. Overall, an easy, interesting GE.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Oct. 27, 2016
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: I

If you don't mind reading tons and tons of documents. You gotta take this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
April 7, 2016
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-

I love Dr. deGuzman! Take him! He's a wonderful professor! He always has a sense of humor and I honestly wanted to drop this class in the first place, after reading the syllabus with a number of readings we have to do before each lecture, but they are very interesting! You only need to buy two textbooks, but they aren't too expensive. The grading is based on section, midterm, research project and final. You have to participate in section and facilitate! He gives you a study guide, so you won't have to worry about cramming in everything from the textbook. He will specifically tell you what will be on the midterm! They are I.D. terms and are written in short essay formats! The grading is very fair. I had Kenny as my TA and he definitely prepared our class for the final, since we got a lower average for the midterm. The midterm had a B average, which wasn't too bad. I wished I could take Dr. deGuzman again! He is awesome sauce!

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Dec. 20, 2016
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: A+

This class was my favorite class this quarter despite being an 8 am (which is really saying something). Dr. DeGuzman is an amazing lecturer and really tries to make the information understandable to the class. The class broke down into 1/3 participation, which is based on participation in discussion (and your TA will have a specific guideline as to how they run the discussion and give points), 1/3 final exam, and the midterm and final paper together make up the last 1/3 of the grade. The paper was an 8 page interview based paper that really wasn't too hard if you went to TA office hours and talked about what they wanted to see (I got a perfect score). The midterm and final were the same: there was a list of 10 terms and 3-4 essays we had to study. 3 of these terms were on the exam and you had to define 2, and 3 of the essays were on the test, and you also answer 2 (1 for the midterm). The terms and essays were repeated word for word from the study guide, so it is super straightforward. The work for the class was primarily reading (maybe 100-ish pages a week?), but the reading was super engaging and not too sense so it really wasn't that bad. My TA, Christina Ayson, was AWESOME and really tried to make herself available to us to work on our papers, and discussion was always super interesting with her. As long as you do all the work and talk to your TA regularly, you shouldn't have any trouble getting an A (especially with all the extra credit offered in the class).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Dec. 23, 2016
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: B+

Dr. Deguzman makes this class very interesting and I attended every lecture besides one that I overslept on ( this class was an 8am). The midterms and final were straight forward and fair since he provides a study guide and nothing is a surprise. You have an oral history paper for this class and it is graded by your TA. I had Christina as my TA and she was very knowledgeable about the topic but her grading was rather tough. I was never able to get full credit on any reflections and my overall grade suffered from not having a good grade for my oral history paper. Make sure you spend a lot of time on your paper and reflections and show up to discussion for participation credit.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Dec. 23, 2016
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: A+

As a freshman in my first quarter, this was the first class I ever took. It definitely set the mood for a really amazing first quarter with him. He is genuinely a good professor that is passionate about the subjects he speaks about. He is engaging, funny, and made waking up for an 8 am worth it! I think I was very lucky in making the decision to take this class. I really hope UCLA keeps him around for a long time because this class made the difficult transition of going into college a lot easier. It was also very interesting and eyeopening, and the things he talks about really influences your views on Asian American history for the better. I couldn't have imagined my first quarter in college without him or this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
June 21, 2024
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: A

Dr. JP was genuinely a godsend during our tumultuous spring quarter. He taught our seminar "Buddhism and Intersectionality", and managed to make our 3 hour sessions fly by with his engaging lecture style and discussion-based lesson plans. Dr. JP was especially equipped to teach our seminar as he is the professor for "Intro to Asian American Studies", AND an ordained Buddhist priest. I came into the class knowing practically nothing about Buddhism, and only had entry-level knowledge of the Japanese experience post-Pearl Harbor, yet I managed to come out with a solid grasp of the interactions between both topics. I arrived at every class excited to learn and hopeful that we would be let out 30 minutes early (our norm). Dr. JP cultivated a community feel to our seminar and I really feel like I made 17 new friends after taking his class. Not only would I enroll in this class again, but I will be on the lookout for other classes that he may teach in the future. If you show up to class, skim the readings, and get the assignments in (no late policy), you'll get an A. 100% recommend.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
CLUSTER 20CW
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2021
Grade: A
June 16, 2021

TAKE YOUR SPRING SEMINAR WITH DEGUZMAN IF YOU CAN!!!
--
Deguzman's class was definitely the highlight of my spring quarter!
He is extremely upbeat during class and keeps students very engaged. He made the three hour long seminar feel like it was a breeze. He also was very receptive to feedbacks as he gave us long breaks in our meetings.
I cannot say enough good things about the positive energy he brings to the class.
--
GRADING
I know y'all are reading this to know about grading, and I would say that you can definitely get an A in his class even if you think you are bad at writing. He only has 1 big writing assignment, which is a paper you work on throughout the quarter. He sets deadlines for parts of it so you don't get behind which was helpful because I never felt stressed about the writing ever during this class (I also heard that other spring seminars had writing every week/every other week, so if you are looking to avoid that, take this class).
With that being said, he also still greatly improves your writing. He gives detailed feedback on issues he sees with your writing, and if you appropriately address those issues and listen to his comments you will get an A. I attended his office hours for extra feedback and he would let you know what needed to be altered and he also went above and beyond and found sources for us to use in our papers which I thought was really nice and helpful.
25% Class engagement
25% Class presentation
5% List of Sources
10% Thesis and Outline
10% Rough Draft
25% Final Draft
--
I wish I was able to take him in previous quarters of this seminar, so if you get the chance definitely take this seminar.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
ASIA AM 10
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Summer 2021
Grade: A
Aug. 6, 2021

Professor deGuzman is a great professor to begin a path in Asian American Studies, or simply fulfill a GE requirement with. Although, I did not visit lectures often, he used engaging slides, brought in guest speakers, and even simulated group discussion via Jamboard and other platforms. The way to achieving an A in his class is to always finish your paper ahead of time (1-2 days before), and schedule a private 1 on 1 session for him to review the content before submission day. If he signs off on the paper, it is an automatic 100% eyes closed. However, if your rough draft doesn't completely fly on the first try, he gives spectacular feedback which will enable you to ace the paper for sure. I even failed to complete a quiz on time, and he extended the deadline for me, meaning he is lenient on tardiness and cares about the students. He gives weekly readings, which are quizzed on. However, to be honest, the quizzes were open note, so I did not stress about reading them at all.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
ASIA AM 10
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: N/A
Nov. 29, 2016

Professor deGuzman is great! His lectures are easy to follow and he tries really hard to be approachable. His slides tie the readings together really clearly and as long as you go to class and do the readings, it's easy because he makes all the concepts really simple and lets you know exactly what material you have to study for the tests. That being said, it is a lot of reading, and I took this class at 8 am, so I'm suffering now for not getting out of bed for lecture a few times. Don't let yourself fall behind because this class is hard to catch up in. So, if you'll faithfully go to every class and do every reading, definitely take this class because it's super interesting/easy and he makes it all the more so. But if you're not going to consistently stay on top of it, you're going to struggle.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
ASIA AM 10
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A
Sept. 26, 2016

Professor deGuzman was great! The class wasn't too hard, and the sections were actually worthwhile. Overall, an easy, interesting GE.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
ASIA AM 10
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: I
Oct. 27, 2016

If you don't mind reading tons and tons of documents. You gotta take this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
ASIA AM 10
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-
April 7, 2016

I love Dr. deGuzman! Take him! He's a wonderful professor! He always has a sense of humor and I honestly wanted to drop this class in the first place, after reading the syllabus with a number of readings we have to do before each lecture, but they are very interesting! You only need to buy two textbooks, but they aren't too expensive. The grading is based on section, midterm, research project and final. You have to participate in section and facilitate! He gives you a study guide, so you won't have to worry about cramming in everything from the textbook. He will specifically tell you what will be on the midterm! They are I.D. terms and are written in short essay formats! The grading is very fair. I had Kenny as my TA and he definitely prepared our class for the final, since we got a lower average for the midterm. The midterm had a B average, which wasn't too bad. I wished I could take Dr. deGuzman again! He is awesome sauce!

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
ASIA AM 10
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: A+
Dec. 20, 2016

This class was my favorite class this quarter despite being an 8 am (which is really saying something). Dr. DeGuzman is an amazing lecturer and really tries to make the information understandable to the class. The class broke down into 1/3 participation, which is based on participation in discussion (and your TA will have a specific guideline as to how they run the discussion and give points), 1/3 final exam, and the midterm and final paper together make up the last 1/3 of the grade. The paper was an 8 page interview based paper that really wasn't too hard if you went to TA office hours and talked about what they wanted to see (I got a perfect score). The midterm and final were the same: there was a list of 10 terms and 3-4 essays we had to study. 3 of these terms were on the exam and you had to define 2, and 3 of the essays were on the test, and you also answer 2 (1 for the midterm). The terms and essays were repeated word for word from the study guide, so it is super straightforward. The work for the class was primarily reading (maybe 100-ish pages a week?), but the reading was super engaging and not too sense so it really wasn't that bad. My TA, Christina Ayson, was AWESOME and really tried to make herself available to us to work on our papers, and discussion was always super interesting with her. As long as you do all the work and talk to your TA regularly, you shouldn't have any trouble getting an A (especially with all the extra credit offered in the class).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
ASIA AM 10
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: B+
Dec. 23, 2016

Dr. Deguzman makes this class very interesting and I attended every lecture besides one that I overslept on ( this class was an 8am). The midterms and final were straight forward and fair since he provides a study guide and nothing is a surprise. You have an oral history paper for this class and it is graded by your TA. I had Christina as my TA and she was very knowledgeable about the topic but her grading was rather tough. I was never able to get full credit on any reflections and my overall grade suffered from not having a good grade for my oral history paper. Make sure you spend a lot of time on your paper and reflections and show up to discussion for participation credit.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
ASIA AM 10
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: A+
Dec. 23, 2016

As a freshman in my first quarter, this was the first class I ever took. It definitely set the mood for a really amazing first quarter with him. He is genuinely a good professor that is passionate about the subjects he speaks about. He is engaging, funny, and made waking up for an 8 am worth it! I think I was very lucky in making the decision to take this class. I really hope UCLA keeps him around for a long time because this class made the difficult transition of going into college a lot easier. It was also very interesting and eyeopening, and the things he talks about really influences your views on Asian American history for the better. I couldn't have imagined my first quarter in college without him or this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
GE CLST 20CW
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: A
June 21, 2024

Dr. JP was genuinely a godsend during our tumultuous spring quarter. He taught our seminar "Buddhism and Intersectionality", and managed to make our 3 hour sessions fly by with his engaging lecture style and discussion-based lesson plans. Dr. JP was especially equipped to teach our seminar as he is the professor for "Intro to Asian American Studies", AND an ordained Buddhist priest. I came into the class knowing practically nothing about Buddhism, and only had entry-level knowledge of the Japanese experience post-Pearl Harbor, yet I managed to come out with a solid grasp of the interactions between both topics. I arrived at every class excited to learn and hopeful that we would be let out 30 minutes early (our norm). Dr. JP cultivated a community feel to our seminar and I really feel like I made 17 new friends after taking his class. Not only would I enroll in this class again, but I will be on the lookout for other classes that he may teach in the future. If you show up to class, skim the readings, and get the assignments in (no late policy), you'll get an A. 100% recommend.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 2
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!