- Home
- Search
- Janna Shadduck-Hernandez
- LBR&WS M136
AD
Based on 2 Users
TOP TAGS
- Engaging Lectures
- Participation Matters
- Issues PTEs
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
I love Janna as a Professor and a person. As someone who wants a career in education, this class was engaging and just overall enjoyable. This class is only offered in spring, so if you're looking for an easy class to finish off your senior year, this class is not it, because there is a considerable amount of work alongside fieldwork. This includes a reading group presentation, two essays, your fieldwork essay/curriculum, and your final essay (8-10 pages). The fieldwork I decided to participate in was going to a school and creating a curriculum of activities for the student's after-school program. While I liked the students and the work I did, it was heavily unorganized, and it was clear that I was doing more work compared to the other fieldwork options. The other fieldwork options were simply a 2-page essay or one Zoom/after-school session, I had to attend my after-school sessions multiple times throughout different weeks with my own time and gas money to get there, despite this, this didn't result in extra points. I ended up with an A- in this class because while Janna grades pretty fairly, in the final I felt it was unjustly graded harshly. Not only was the final very unclear and overall confusing, but despite putting in my best effort it was graded horribly putting me from an A+ to B+ I was only saved because of participation points. I also felt Janna was biased against group papers, which is what I did, and talking with other groups they were also graded the same low score. I understood Janna preferred it to be done individually, however, with all the work she required alongside me dealing with other classes, my group certainly felt we can make an effective paper together. This also included other parts leading up to the final paper that was done as a group which is confusing why the final isn't done as a group originally. So overall, while I like Janna and the course content, the final was like getting hit by a bus suddenly, with nothing you can do. I would probably recommend this class if you are a junior preferably.
Janna is one of my favorite professors at UCLA. For this class, there are no midterms or finals, just 2 short papers and one longer final paper. She also lets you revise them and have them be regraded if you aren't happy about the grade. Most people get A's. Attendance is required and the class is super interactive so it challenges you to put yourself out there a bit. The class does require 3 field visits which can be challenging to find time but you'll learn a lot about different communities and education in the US.
I love Janna as a Professor and a person. As someone who wants a career in education, this class was engaging and just overall enjoyable. This class is only offered in spring, so if you're looking for an easy class to finish off your senior year, this class is not it, because there is a considerable amount of work alongside fieldwork. This includes a reading group presentation, two essays, your fieldwork essay/curriculum, and your final essay (8-10 pages). The fieldwork I decided to participate in was going to a school and creating a curriculum of activities for the student's after-school program. While I liked the students and the work I did, it was heavily unorganized, and it was clear that I was doing more work compared to the other fieldwork options. The other fieldwork options were simply a 2-page essay or one Zoom/after-school session, I had to attend my after-school sessions multiple times throughout different weeks with my own time and gas money to get there, despite this, this didn't result in extra points. I ended up with an A- in this class because while Janna grades pretty fairly, in the final I felt it was unjustly graded harshly. Not only was the final very unclear and overall confusing, but despite putting in my best effort it was graded horribly putting me from an A+ to B+ I was only saved because of participation points. I also felt Janna was biased against group papers, which is what I did, and talking with other groups they were also graded the same low score. I understood Janna preferred it to be done individually, however, with all the work she required alongside me dealing with other classes, my group certainly felt we can make an effective paper together. This also included other parts leading up to the final paper that was done as a group which is confusing why the final isn't done as a group originally. So overall, while I like Janna and the course content, the final was like getting hit by a bus suddenly, with nothing you can do. I would probably recommend this class if you are a junior preferably.
Janna is one of my favorite professors at UCLA. For this class, there are no midterms or finals, just 2 short papers and one longer final paper. She also lets you revise them and have them be regraded if you aren't happy about the grade. Most people get A's. Attendance is required and the class is super interactive so it challenges you to put yourself out there a bit. The class does require 3 field visits which can be challenging to find time but you'll learn a lot about different communities and education in the US.
Based on 2 Users
TOP TAGS
- Engaging Lectures (2)
- Participation Matters (2)
- Issues PTEs (1)