Jaime Marian
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
AD
2.8
Overall Rating
Based on 4 Users
Easiness 1.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Snazzy Dresser
  • Tough Tests
  • Gives Extra Credit
  • Would Take Again
  • Issues PTEs
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
27.8%
23.1%
18.5%
13.9%
9.3%
4.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

29.0%
24.2%
19.4%
14.5%
9.7%
4.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

22.2%
18.5%
14.8%
11.1%
7.4%
3.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

31.6%
26.3%
21.1%
15.8%
10.5%
5.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

22.9%
19.0%
15.2%
11.4%
7.6%
3.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

39.0%
32.5%
26.0%
19.5%
13.0%
6.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2017
Grade: B+
March 22, 2017

Very knowledgable professor, always gives concrete and real life examples of the material he teaches in class. The class was from 8-10a so lots of lazy students never showed up to class, only about half of attendance, yet the professor understood that and never used attendance against anyone. The homework was exceptionally difficult and a bit disconnected from what is given in class, but the TA Moupi was very helpful and accommodating. The midterm and final were okay though, and his grading is fair. Overall, I learnt quite a bit but was always behind on homework to really enjoy the class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: N/A
March 16, 2017

The previous review is accurate, and honestly an understatement regarding some parts.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2017
Grade: N/A
March 10, 2017

Its actually hard to write this review because of how frustrating this class was. Here are a list of weaknesses that Professor Marian needs to fix. He made the class extremely frustrating for me and many classmates and the experience was embarrassing for the undergraduate education in the material science department.

- Worst lecture slides. Did not relate lecture slides to homework AT ALL! Always did a top level review of subjects in class and did not explain quantitative equations. NO EXAMPLE PROBLEMS in an application based class...

- Very clearly did not care about students. Never established office hours. Had an attitude like he had something more important to do. Did not fix obvious mistakes in lecture slides.

-Homework was a joke.

-Midterm was a joke. Midterm point distribution was out of whack. Small mistakes meant half the problem was wrong.

- I could go on and on, but to sum up - Marian obviously cared little about his class, his lectures only ever skim the surface and do not connect with his homework or tests, and overall he just made me disinterested in the subject matter.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2017
Grade: B+
March 22, 2017

Very knowledgable professor, always gives concrete and real life examples of the material he teaches in class. The class was from 8-10a so lots of lazy students never showed up to class, only about half of attendance, yet the professor understood that and never used attendance against anyone. The homework was exceptionally difficult and a bit disconnected from what is given in class, but the TA Moupi was very helpful and accommodating. The midterm and final were okay though, and his grading is fair. Overall, I learnt quite a bit but was always behind on homework to really enjoy the class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: N/A
March 16, 2017

The previous review is accurate, and honestly an understatement regarding some parts.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2017
Grade: N/A
March 10, 2017

Its actually hard to write this review because of how frustrating this class was. Here are a list of weaknesses that Professor Marian needs to fix. He made the class extremely frustrating for me and many classmates and the experience was embarrassing for the undergraduate education in the material science department.

- Worst lecture slides. Did not relate lecture slides to homework AT ALL! Always did a top level review of subjects in class and did not explain quantitative equations. NO EXAMPLE PROBLEMS in an application based class...

- Very clearly did not care about students. Never established office hours. Had an attitude like he had something more important to do. Did not fix obvious mistakes in lecture slides.

-Homework was a joke.

-Midterm was a joke. Midterm point distribution was out of whack. Small mistakes meant half the problem was wrong.

- I could go on and on, but to sum up - Marian obviously cared little about his class, his lectures only ever skim the surface and do not connect with his homework or tests, and overall he just made me disinterested in the subject matter.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.8
Overall Rating
Based on 4 Users
Easiness 1.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (2)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (2)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (2)
  • Snazzy Dresser
    (1)
  • Tough Tests
    (2)
  • Gives Extra Credit
    (2)
  • Would Take Again
    (2)
  • Issues PTEs
    (2)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!