Jacob J Schmidt
Department of Engineering
AD
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 5 Users
Easiness 4.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
100.0%
83.3%
66.7%
50.0%
33.3%
16.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

58.8%
49.0%
39.2%
29.4%
19.6%
9.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

53.8%
44.9%
35.9%
26.9%
17.9%
9.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

100.0%
83.3%
66.7%
50.0%
33.3%
16.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

61.5%
51.3%
41.0%
30.8%
20.5%
10.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

61.1%
50.9%
40.7%
30.6%
20.4%
10.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

66.7%
55.6%
44.4%
33.3%
22.2%
11.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: A
Dec. 24, 2019

This isn't a review for the professor, E96 classes are taught by students. The professor only comes in on the first day and drops in the last day to listen to your presentations.

I thought the class was great! I really enjoyed making an electrocardiogram. There are only a few easy assignments the first few weeks and then you work on an extension project. There are clear presentations with slides that go over the technical side of the project and the theory behind it. It's really not hard at all, more people should take this class.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2022
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 28, 2022

Obligatory not a review for the professor. Would definitely recommend taking this class! It's not much of a time or work investment, and I learned a lot about Arduinos and general electrical engineering stuff. You can pretty much do anything that you want for the final extension project as long as it's interesting, so you can pick something you're comfortable with or something you want to learn more about for it. The students leading the class were very understanding and helpful.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2022
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 28, 2022

Professor Schmidt is only listed as the professor because there needs to be a professor listed for the class. Never seen him in my life. This class is taught by undergrad peers (which is a huge plus, and is better than any professor teaching due to the nature of the class). Projects are interesting, but the pace is reaaaaaly slow for the first 5 weeks and then ramps up near the end. You'll get to build a working ECG device which is actually pretty incredible if you think about it. The final project is making an enhanced ECG in some way; this is a group project. I HIGHLY recommend that your group contains: 1 CS major/someone good at coding, at LEAST 1 EE major/someone who is good with circuits, and either an ME major or another EE major who is good with CAD and 3D modeling/fabrication. All of these components were necessary to create the final project. As a CS major myself, there is no way I could have done it alone without the knowledge of my more hardware-oriented peers.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: A
Dec. 24, 2019

This isn't a review for the professor, E96 classes are taught by students. The professor only comes in on the first day and drops in the last day to listen to your presentations.

I thought the class was great! I really enjoyed making an electrocardiogram. There are only a few easy assignments the first few weeks and then you work on an extension project. There are clear presentations with slides that go over the technical side of the project and the theory behind it. It's really not hard at all, more people should take this class.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2022
Grade: A
Dec. 28, 2022

Obligatory not a review for the professor. Would definitely recommend taking this class! It's not much of a time or work investment, and I learned a lot about Arduinos and general electrical engineering stuff. You can pretty much do anything that you want for the final extension project as long as it's interesting, so you can pick something you're comfortable with or something you want to learn more about for it. The students leading the class were very understanding and helpful.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2022
Grade: A
Dec. 28, 2022

Professor Schmidt is only listed as the professor because there needs to be a professor listed for the class. Never seen him in my life. This class is taught by undergrad peers (which is a huge plus, and is better than any professor teaching due to the nature of the class). Projects are interesting, but the pace is reaaaaaly slow for the first 5 weeks and then ramps up near the end. You'll get to build a working ECG device which is actually pretty incredible if you think about it. The final project is making an enhanced ECG in some way; this is a group project. I HIGHLY recommend that your group contains: 1 CS major/someone good at coding, at LEAST 1 EE major/someone who is good with circuits, and either an ME major or another EE major who is good with CAD and 3D modeling/fabrication. All of these components were necessary to create the final project. As a CS major myself, there is no way I could have done it alone without the knowledge of my more hardware-oriented peers.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 5 Users
Easiness 4.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!