Hui-shu Lee
Department of Art History
AD
2.5
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.7 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
52.0%
43.4%
34.7%
26.0%
17.3%
8.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

56.2%
46.8%
37.4%
28.1%
18.7%
9.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

21.7%
18.1%
14.5%
10.9%
7.2%
3.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (4)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2018
Grade: A
June 4, 2019

This class honestly made me start smoking again

Helpful?

9 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2018
Grade: A
Feb. 14, 2018

The class consists of all slides with no context. Just the picture, year, and location excavated. The exam for this class requires you to memorize about 100 of the described above (and its only worth 30%). Not worth going to class and lots of reading per week. I'm a chemical engineering major and this is my busiest class.. such useless memorization and a waste of time.

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: NR
March 17, 2016

Pretty hard. Should have just done the readings and not gone to class. The lectures were hard to follow and although they were put online, they were not useful to go back and refer to. Most of the material was in the reading, only a little bit was vaguely covered in class.

Couldn't understand the second professor (Lee); she was very quiet, had a strong accent, and did not put together slides that were easy to glean information from.

Made me start smoking again tbh.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2022
Grade: A
March 1, 2023

I had both Lee and Faulkenhausen for this course. I'm an art history major so I didn't find the material difficult at all, but I that doesn't mean I found it interesting. Fortunately, the professors were kind and were lenient with the ongoing TA strike so grades weren't issue. However, I had difficulty paying much attention at all during lectures because I just couldn't get into it. The lectures felt sporadic and know one knew what information to focus on. I think Chinese art is so interesting (i'm chinese) but the stories could've been weaved together much better and main ideas more clearly stated to help out students more.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2018
Grade: A
June 4, 2019

This class honestly made me start smoking again

Helpful?

9 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2018
Grade: A
Feb. 14, 2018

The class consists of all slides with no context. Just the picture, year, and location excavated. The exam for this class requires you to memorize about 100 of the described above (and its only worth 30%). Not worth going to class and lots of reading per week. I'm a chemical engineering major and this is my busiest class.. such useless memorization and a waste of time.

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: NR
March 17, 2016

Pretty hard. Should have just done the readings and not gone to class. The lectures were hard to follow and although they were put online, they were not useful to go back and refer to. Most of the material was in the reading, only a little bit was vaguely covered in class.

Couldn't understand the second professor (Lee); she was very quiet, had a strong accent, and did not put together slides that were easy to glean information from.

Made me start smoking again tbh.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2022
Grade: A
March 1, 2023

I had both Lee and Faulkenhausen for this course. I'm an art history major so I didn't find the material difficult at all, but I that doesn't mean I found it interesting. Fortunately, the professors were kind and were lenient with the ongoing TA strike so grades weren't issue. However, I had difficulty paying much attention at all during lectures because I just couldn't get into it. The lectures felt sporadic and know one knew what information to focus on. I think Chinese art is so interesting (i'm chinese) but the stories could've been weaved together much better and main ideas more clearly stated to help out students more.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.5
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.7 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!