Howard Stahl
Department of Computer Science
AD
4.3
Overall Rating
Based on 9 Users
Easiness 3.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.6 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (7)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: A+
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 16, 2024

Pretty easy class, Tests have a few tricky questions and Stahl makes a lot of grading mishaps, but he is quite accommodating and flexible. Would recommend taking CS 32 with Stahl, especially if you are not very confident on your coding skills

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 13, 2024

Slow, clear lecturer. Skipped lots of hard topics. Simpler coding problems on exams but enforces syntax memorization and has you memorizing very course-specific implementations, and I don't like that. Raw score only, no curve. Easy projects with skeletons provided. Homework is canvas quizzes, often with tons of mistakes. Exams have a lot of mistakes too. He also taught quadratic probing in a way that goes against the conventions agreed upon by 95% of the internet. He's very kind and responsive when correcting mistakes, however. I wish he included more choice-based, more group-based, and more challenging projects.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Nov. 29, 2024

Definitely easier than CS32 with Smallberg/Nachenberg. The projects (35% of our grade) are almost too easy (although the last 2 are a bit tough) and the homework (15%) is straightforward too. The exams are pretty fair (12.5% for Midterm I, 12.5% for Midterm II, and 25% for the final) and he is lenient with regrade requests. He also gives you 2 bonus points on either midterm 1 or 2 depending on if you actually go to section. His lectures can be pretty boring at times but he records them so watching them at 2X speed is recommended in addition to going to his office hours which are helpful. The TAs can be pretty dogshit, not going to lie. Mine barely spoke English and would buffer in real-time. However, Stahl's class is not super difficult and is 100% doable. You can definitely get an A in his CS32 class, which is supposedly a weeder too. I would take it again.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A+
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Jan. 24, 2024

Pros: Howard fits in perfectly next to Smallberg and Nachenberg for an absolutely stacked CS32 teaching core. If you have the correct habits (going to lectures, participating in discussions, starting projects early) this class feels strangely too easy. For a class sometimes described as a weeder, Howard is so straight forward, logical, and clear that learning comes easy and besides making cheat sheets for midterms and finals I didn't even study. There is also no debate that Howard's projects and exams are easier than Smallberg and Nachenberg's but knowing many people that have taken CS32 with those professors I wouldn't say they knew any concepts or programmed any better than me after taking Howard. Definitely my favorite class I've taken at UCLA so far.

Cons: Some found his lectures a little boring and slow paced. Also, since it was his first time teaching CS32, he had mistakes in homework, projects specs, and exams.

Grading:
20% Homework
30% Projects
12.5% Midterm 1
12.5% Midterm 2
25% Final
Extra Credit for Participation in Discussion (Very Small)

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A
Jan. 14, 2024

Goated professor for this class. He teaches in a way that makes everything very clear and easy to follow. Tests were very reasonable and the projects were not too bad, just don’t wait until the last minute and they should go well.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 29, 2023

Pros: he's extremely nice, he's a good lecturer, he made it clear what was covered on the exams, he was very approachable, the projects weren't too difficult

Cons: I felt he didn't go into enough depth on some of the topics (hashing, sorting, searching, etc.), which makes me feel less prepared for upper divs/interviews

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: B
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 23, 2023

Howard is an incredible professor. I would highly recommend taking a class with him if you have the chance.
He is incredibly knowledgeable and a great lecturer. For the entirety of each two hour lecture, I found myself completely engaged throughout. I learned the concepts thoroughly through his lectures. He has a way of teaching that allowed me to fully understand these concepts. I wasn't just learning what code to write down, but I was learning about how the program actually words and why we need to tell the computer something in a certain way. I was able to develop a deep understanding of these concepts. This made my life infinitely easier when it was time for exams, because I didn't actually feel the need to study a lot. I already knew the concepts so well that all it took was a review before I felt confident. He also allowed us to have cheat sheets for the exams which helped a lot.
The projects will be tough, especially the last few. It cannot be emphasized enough that you can't start a project too early. Just do yourself a favor and start the project the day it gets assigned. You won't regret it.
Howard's office hours were always extremely helpful, and he will take time to answer your question or look at your code one-on-one.
I remember Howard introducing himself on the first day of lecture as "human". And he definitely is. He's easily approachable, and he will be understanding if you are going through something. He will take time to explain a tricky concept or answer your question.
This class is by no means easy. You will have to put in a lot of time and effort. But if you are hardworking and stay on top of the work, you can be very successful in Howard's class.
My advice for a successful quarter: go to every lecture in person, start the projects when they're assigned, and go to office hours.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: A+
Dec. 16, 2024

Pretty easy class, Tests have a few tricky questions and Stahl makes a lot of grading mishaps, but he is quite accommodating and flexible. Would recommend taking CS 32 with Stahl, especially if you are not very confident on your coding skills

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: A
Dec. 13, 2024

Slow, clear lecturer. Skipped lots of hard topics. Simpler coding problems on exams but enforces syntax memorization and has you memorizing very course-specific implementations, and I don't like that. Raw score only, no curve. Easy projects with skeletons provided. Homework is canvas quizzes, often with tons of mistakes. Exams have a lot of mistakes too. He also taught quadratic probing in a way that goes against the conventions agreed upon by 95% of the internet. He's very kind and responsive when correcting mistakes, however. I wish he included more choice-based, more group-based, and more challenging projects.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: A
Nov. 29, 2024

Definitely easier than CS32 with Smallberg/Nachenberg. The projects (35% of our grade) are almost too easy (although the last 2 are a bit tough) and the homework (15%) is straightforward too. The exams are pretty fair (12.5% for Midterm I, 12.5% for Midterm II, and 25% for the final) and he is lenient with regrade requests. He also gives you 2 bonus points on either midterm 1 or 2 depending on if you actually go to section. His lectures can be pretty boring at times but he records them so watching them at 2X speed is recommended in addition to going to his office hours which are helpful. The TAs can be pretty dogshit, not going to lie. Mine barely spoke English and would buffer in real-time. However, Stahl's class is not super difficult and is 100% doable. You can definitely get an A in his CS32 class, which is supposedly a weeder too. I would take it again.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A+
Jan. 24, 2024

Pros: Howard fits in perfectly next to Smallberg and Nachenberg for an absolutely stacked CS32 teaching core. If you have the correct habits (going to lectures, participating in discussions, starting projects early) this class feels strangely too easy. For a class sometimes described as a weeder, Howard is so straight forward, logical, and clear that learning comes easy and besides making cheat sheets for midterms and finals I didn't even study. There is also no debate that Howard's projects and exams are easier than Smallberg and Nachenberg's but knowing many people that have taken CS32 with those professors I wouldn't say they knew any concepts or programmed any better than me after taking Howard. Definitely my favorite class I've taken at UCLA so far.

Cons: Some found his lectures a little boring and slow paced. Also, since it was his first time teaching CS32, he had mistakes in homework, projects specs, and exams.

Grading:
20% Homework
30% Projects
12.5% Midterm 1
12.5% Midterm 2
25% Final
Extra Credit for Participation in Discussion (Very Small)

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A
Jan. 14, 2024

Goated professor for this class. He teaches in a way that makes everything very clear and easy to follow. Tests were very reasonable and the projects were not too bad, just don’t wait until the last minute and they should go well.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A
Dec. 29, 2023

Pros: he's extremely nice, he's a good lecturer, he made it clear what was covered on the exams, he was very approachable, the projects weren't too difficult

Cons: I felt he didn't go into enough depth on some of the topics (hashing, sorting, searching, etc.), which makes me feel less prepared for upper divs/interviews

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: B
Dec. 23, 2023

Howard is an incredible professor. I would highly recommend taking a class with him if you have the chance.
He is incredibly knowledgeable and a great lecturer. For the entirety of each two hour lecture, I found myself completely engaged throughout. I learned the concepts thoroughly through his lectures. He has a way of teaching that allowed me to fully understand these concepts. I wasn't just learning what code to write down, but I was learning about how the program actually words and why we need to tell the computer something in a certain way. I was able to develop a deep understanding of these concepts. This made my life infinitely easier when it was time for exams, because I didn't actually feel the need to study a lot. I already knew the concepts so well that all it took was a review before I felt confident. He also allowed us to have cheat sheets for the exams which helped a lot.
The projects will be tough, especially the last few. It cannot be emphasized enough that you can't start a project too early. Just do yourself a favor and start the project the day it gets assigned. You won't regret it.
Howard's office hours were always extremely helpful, and he will take time to answer your question or look at your code one-on-one.
I remember Howard introducing himself on the first day of lecture as "human". And he definitely is. He's easily approachable, and he will be understanding if you are going through something. He will take time to explain a tricky concept or answer your question.
This class is by no means easy. You will have to put in a lot of time and effort. But if you are hardworking and stay on top of the work, you can be very successful in Howard's class.
My advice for a successful quarter: go to every lecture in person, start the projects when they're assigned, and go to office hours.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.3
Overall Rating
Based on 9 Users
Easiness 3.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.6 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!