Hans-Martin Liebing
Department of Film and Television
AD
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 11, 2023

I suggest you don't take this class if you aren't 100% considering getting into the film industry. If you are a FILM TV minor like myself, this class is not your best option.

Class is composed of
1. Development Assignment 1
2. Development Assignment 2
3. Quiz,
4. Weekly 10 Questions Submission
5. Participation.
6. Group Project

The worst part about this class was that there was no structure whatsoever, You would think that you would learn about the Global Film and Television industry, but no. He barely goes in depth about how the industry is and what they do. For the 10 weeks that I spent in his class, I learned nothing. Absolutely nothing. The development assignments are also a pain. The first one is not the worst since you just write log lines, talk about your plan to produce one of your ideas, and choose a global industry and analyze it. But for the group project, you have to make 10-15 page pitch deck, a sizzle reel, and another assignment with maximum 10 people in your group. You also have to record a pitch with the group you did the assignment with and pitch it to actual film professionals, and they critique your pitch by making you go in front of the stage. The second development assignment was worse since you had to all of that work by yourself and you also had to contact a film professional from LinkedIn in order to arrange an interview with them. There was no help WHATSOEVER about this. We just had to do it. For those who desire to be in the film industry, this class might help. But for those who are in the minor and do not know much about the material, this was an absolute disaster.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A+
Jan. 4, 2024

Easy A, but a waste of time. Liebing's nice and a very relaxed professor, and he had interesting guest speakers sometimes. But his lectures were dull and his teaching style just did not work for me. Each of his presentation slides had 10(!) paragraphs on them, and he would just read them off the page. We were meeting every Monday from 7-9:50PM at Melnitz, and pretty much everyone would leave after the TAs took attendance. Liebing was also incredibly unclear about assignments, and he didn't even seem to know what instructions/deadlines he had for the class. Workload wasn't bad. There are several big projects (such as finding an industry professional to interview, and a group project where you develop a TV/film project with other 10 people and get feedback from executives).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A
Dec. 11, 2023

I suggest you don't take this class if you aren't 100% considering getting into the film industry. If you are a FILM TV minor like myself, this class is not your best option.

Class is composed of
1. Development Assignment 1
2. Development Assignment 2
3. Quiz,
4. Weekly 10 Questions Submission
5. Participation.
6. Group Project

The worst part about this class was that there was no structure whatsoever, You would think that you would learn about the Global Film and Television industry, but no. He barely goes in depth about how the industry is and what they do. For the 10 weeks that I spent in his class, I learned nothing. Absolutely nothing. The development assignments are also a pain. The first one is not the worst since you just write log lines, talk about your plan to produce one of your ideas, and choose a global industry and analyze it. But for the group project, you have to make 10-15 page pitch deck, a sizzle reel, and another assignment with maximum 10 people in your group. You also have to record a pitch with the group you did the assignment with and pitch it to actual film professionals, and they critique your pitch by making you go in front of the stage. The second development assignment was worse since you had to all of that work by yourself and you also had to contact a film professional from LinkedIn in order to arrange an interview with them. There was no help WHATSOEVER about this. We just had to do it. For those who desire to be in the film industry, this class might help. But for those who are in the minor and do not know much about the material, this was an absolute disaster.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A+
Jan. 4, 2024

Easy A, but a waste of time. Liebing's nice and a very relaxed professor, and he had interesting guest speakers sometimes. But his lectures were dull and his teaching style just did not work for me. Each of his presentation slides had 10(!) paragraphs on them, and he would just read them off the page. We were meeting every Monday from 7-9:50PM at Melnitz, and pretty much everyone would leave after the TAs took attendance. Liebing was also incredibly unclear about assignments, and he didn't even seem to know what instructions/deadlines he had for the class. Workload wasn't bad. There are several big projects (such as finding an industry professional to interview, and a group project where you develop a TV/film project with other 10 people and get feedback from executives).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!