Georgios Koutroulakis
Department of Physics
AD
3.6
Overall Rating
Based on 12 Users
Easiness 2.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.9 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Often Funny
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Needs Textbook
  • Tough Tests
  • Would Take Again
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
21.1%
17.6%
14.1%
10.6%
7.0%
3.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

20.2%
16.9%
13.5%
10.1%
6.7%
3.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

25.4%
21.1%
16.9%
12.7%
8.5%
4.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (11)

1 of 2
1 of 2
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2015
Grade: N/A
Jan. 3, 2017

The bundle at the textbook store is $177, I have a few bundles I'm selling for $50. Email me: ************* !

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-
Dec. 24, 2016

I didn't have physics background so this class was much harder for me than it was for most of the people in the class. You look at his grading distribution and think "Oh wow that's not bad, this class will be a breeze" I mean 30% of the class my quarter ended with a solid A, but no. The plentitude of A's is only because SO MANY people in class have already learned all the material from their prior educational institutions. Anyways here's what to expect from his class.

Homework (5%):
Homework is due weekly. You have textbook problems (which aren't graded) that you upload online on CCLE. You also have this online program called "Masteringphysics"' which was total bullshit. It was so expensive and some of the assignments were actually really difficult sometimes but if you kept answering incorrectly your assignment grade would drop before you realize it so my friends and I ended up just looking for the solutions online so we won't lose points. In my opinion it didn't really help in preparing you for the exams.

Lab (15%):
The labs are mixed with all the 6A lectures. My TA was super chill, told us exactly what to do at the beginning of lab and always ended up giving everyone 100%. It's really boring and tedious though and doesn't help with understanding the material at all. Thanks to my TA though, lab was a real grade booster for me.

Midterms (40%):
You have 2 in-class midterms each worth 20% of your grade. All exams consist of conceptual multiple choice questions and problem solving free response questions. The MC questions were the worst. You really have to read the question carefully so you don't accidentally misinterpret the situation. It was especially bad because some of the wording was just confusing. All the tests were hard for me but I'm sure if you have physics background or can understand the material you should be fine. BUT, you do NOT have the leisure of taking your time solving the problems and double checking your work. The professor told us that he didn't want to make a grading curve by making the test really difficult so instead, he made a time crunch on purpose so that the curve will be made by students who have mastered the material and can therefore read the problem and know how to solve it right away versus students like me who didn't always know how to set up the problem immediately.
Midterm 1 average: 75%
Midterm 2 average: Never told us the exact grading distribution for this one but he mentioned it was a little under 70%.

Final (40%):
God this final was so hard. Because we had three hours to work it out, I could tell he definitely upped the difficulty. Same format as the midterms though, just longer and harder. It reminded me of Lavelle's Chem 14A/B finals where you had random situations that you haven't seen before but worse since I hadn't fully mastered the physics material as opposed to chem.
Final average: 71%

Extra credit (MAXIMUM of 1%):
You can get a maximum of 0.5% of EC just by going to class and doing the clicker questions so definitely don't skip lecture.
You can also get 0.5% EC by doing these pre and post tests surveys on CCLE.

Discussions didn't really help for me since my TA didn't really know how to advice us for the tests. He was an experienced TA but he himself also didn't know how the exams would work so his review sessions and practice problems were just meh. They're also doing this new discussion experiment where some sections were the traditional classroom setting where the TA just goes over how to solve problems while some sections, students were to work in groups to solve the problems before the TA went over the answers. You can switch into whichever one you prefer.

His grading scale is pretty lenient though.
95-100% A+
90-95% A
85-90% A-
80-85% B+
This totally saved me along with the extra credit and chill lab TA.

During lecture you can tell he has an accent but that was all it was for me. Just an accent. I never had trouble understanding him even though it was my first time listening to a Greek accent. The most negative thing I have to say about lecture was I always felt uncomfortable answering and asking questions. Often times (maybe it was just the natural tone of his voice) he would reply curtly if someone asked a "stupid" question or a question that was unrelated to the current topic. Sometimes if a student answered one of his questions incorrectly you could hear in his voice that he was exasperated or super baffled as to how they got that answer. Not really supportive if you ask me. In any case, lectures were as boring as any other science class but he had a lot of demonstrations which always caught everyone's attention and were fun and interesting to watch. In my opinion, if you have the option. try to take 6A with Schriver. All my friends in Schriver including those that didn't have physics background were chilling the whole quarter and most of them still got solid As or higher while I worked my ass off and still couldn't get the A. In fact, I think I barely clutched my A- to be honest. If you're comfortable with physics though then I don't see any harm in taking it with Koutroulakis but if you're completely new (like me) really try to take 6A with Schriver if you want to keep your GPA as high as possible.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: B+
Dec. 18, 2016

Koutroulakis isn't a bad professor for physics. You could certainly get worse. He got frustrated with our class several times because nobody wanted to raise their hands to answer his questions and was obviously annoyed by how eager people were to leave at the end of lecture.

The material in the class isn't hard and even if you don't have any physics knowledge you can still do well. If you have studied physics in the past this class will be a breeze. Koutroulakis gives 2 midterms and they can be tricky at times. He puts multiple choice questions on his midterms and final which I found really annoying but I can see why he did it. I thought the final was a little easier than the midterms but I did dedicated a lot of time to studying for it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: N/A
Dec. 18, 2016

Koutroulakis was an engaging lecturer and pretty funny. He explained Physics well and I would definitely take him again. I don't like physics and didn't have a strong background going in, so this class wasn't my favorite, but he made it more bearable. Also, even though I didn't particularly like the material, his demonstrations made the class entertaining. The first midterm wasn't bad, if you studied and understood the concepts it was doable. The second midterm, in my opinion, wasn't much harder, but a lot of other people thought it was more challenging. The final was pretty hard. He said it would cover all material equally, but it focused a lot more on the end concepts, in my opinion. His curve is good though and it's not based on the average, it's predetermined and pretty generous. Also if you do the pre/post tests you get 0.5% extra credit. You can get another 0.5% extra credit if you use a clicker during lecture. Overall I recommend him.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: N/A
Dec. 9, 2016

I hate physics in general but Koutroulakis made it less painful by explaining things in a way that made sense. He was funny too and would do experiments in class to keep us engaged. Discussion isn't mandatory and lectures aren't podcasted. His tests are fair and usually combine conceptual multiple choice problems and then a few regular problems. I would take the whole 6 series with him if I could!

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: N/A
Sept. 28, 2016

Selling the three textbooks you need for the Physics 6 series, the UCLA store sells the bundle for $177 but I'm selling for $100 and they're in mint condition! (no highlights, marking, rip tears, etc.) text me if interested **********

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-
March 18, 2016

Great lecturer. Explains topics in details and answers any question you have to the best of his ability. This was my first physics class ever and it wasn't that bad thanks to him. Midterms are only 50 minutes so time is an issue on those but there's plenty of time to complete the final.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2015
Grade: A
Feb. 25, 2016

My favorite professor from any pre-requisite for a life science major. Looking to crash his 6C class. Wasn't able to go to his office hours, but he was able to get every single topic across to a person who had a shitty physics experience in HS. People who say his accent is hard to understand are just bitter lol it is NOTICEABLE that he is not from here, but it has NEVER resulted in me, at least, trying to decipher wtf he was trying to say. I read the book a lot and took it with an easier schedule though, so I lucked out. His homework was due on Friday nights so SET A REMINDER FOR THAT. 6A, by virtue of being the first university physics class, is challenging, so you will probably have to study 2 hours per week. Go to his physics discussions (which aren't mandatory) if you have a question. Cannot stress enough; don't be afraid to take him!!!!

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2015
Grade: A
Feb. 14, 2016

I personally liked him a lot for 6A. His lectures were clear and always funny. I didn't think anything too unexpected was on the tests. They were a time crunch, but sometimes he even reused questions we saw before. I'm taking him again for 6C for sure

Helpful?

5 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2015
Grade: B
Feb. 6, 2016

Stay away from this class if you are hoping for A in physics 6A. His first midterm and final were ridiculously hard and long, compared to 50 mins allowed, no matter how hard you study for it. Second midterm was ok! I spent all my time studying for his class and doing all the homework and ended up with B. He will tell you the exams are like his slides and the homework assigned, and yeah the multiple choice questions focuses on his quiz questions in the slides but good luck with the rest of the big problems! Hated all the physics because of this guy!

Helpful?

0 2 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2015
Grade: N/A
Jan. 3, 2017

The bundle at the textbook store is $177, I have a few bundles I'm selling for $50. Email me: ************* !

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-
Dec. 24, 2016

I didn't have physics background so this class was much harder for me than it was for most of the people in the class. You look at his grading distribution and think "Oh wow that's not bad, this class will be a breeze" I mean 30% of the class my quarter ended with a solid A, but no. The plentitude of A's is only because SO MANY people in class have already learned all the material from their prior educational institutions. Anyways here's what to expect from his class.

Homework (5%):
Homework is due weekly. You have textbook problems (which aren't graded) that you upload online on CCLE. You also have this online program called "Masteringphysics"' which was total bullshit. It was so expensive and some of the assignments were actually really difficult sometimes but if you kept answering incorrectly your assignment grade would drop before you realize it so my friends and I ended up just looking for the solutions online so we won't lose points. In my opinion it didn't really help in preparing you for the exams.

Lab (15%):
The labs are mixed with all the 6A lectures. My TA was super chill, told us exactly what to do at the beginning of lab and always ended up giving everyone 100%. It's really boring and tedious though and doesn't help with understanding the material at all. Thanks to my TA though, lab was a real grade booster for me.

Midterms (40%):
You have 2 in-class midterms each worth 20% of your grade. All exams consist of conceptual multiple choice questions and problem solving free response questions. The MC questions were the worst. You really have to read the question carefully so you don't accidentally misinterpret the situation. It was especially bad because some of the wording was just confusing. All the tests were hard for me but I'm sure if you have physics background or can understand the material you should be fine. BUT, you do NOT have the leisure of taking your time solving the problems and double checking your work. The professor told us that he didn't want to make a grading curve by making the test really difficult so instead, he made a time crunch on purpose so that the curve will be made by students who have mastered the material and can therefore read the problem and know how to solve it right away versus students like me who didn't always know how to set up the problem immediately.
Midterm 1 average: 75%
Midterm 2 average: Never told us the exact grading distribution for this one but he mentioned it was a little under 70%.

Final (40%):
God this final was so hard. Because we had three hours to work it out, I could tell he definitely upped the difficulty. Same format as the midterms though, just longer and harder. It reminded me of Lavelle's Chem 14A/B finals where you had random situations that you haven't seen before but worse since I hadn't fully mastered the physics material as opposed to chem.
Final average: 71%

Extra credit (MAXIMUM of 1%):
You can get a maximum of 0.5% of EC just by going to class and doing the clicker questions so definitely don't skip lecture.
You can also get 0.5% EC by doing these pre and post tests surveys on CCLE.

Discussions didn't really help for me since my TA didn't really know how to advice us for the tests. He was an experienced TA but he himself also didn't know how the exams would work so his review sessions and practice problems were just meh. They're also doing this new discussion experiment where some sections were the traditional classroom setting where the TA just goes over how to solve problems while some sections, students were to work in groups to solve the problems before the TA went over the answers. You can switch into whichever one you prefer.

His grading scale is pretty lenient though.
95-100% A+
90-95% A
85-90% A-
80-85% B+
This totally saved me along with the extra credit and chill lab TA.

During lecture you can tell he has an accent but that was all it was for me. Just an accent. I never had trouble understanding him even though it was my first time listening to a Greek accent. The most negative thing I have to say about lecture was I always felt uncomfortable answering and asking questions. Often times (maybe it was just the natural tone of his voice) he would reply curtly if someone asked a "stupid" question or a question that was unrelated to the current topic. Sometimes if a student answered one of his questions incorrectly you could hear in his voice that he was exasperated or super baffled as to how they got that answer. Not really supportive if you ask me. In any case, lectures were as boring as any other science class but he had a lot of demonstrations which always caught everyone's attention and were fun and interesting to watch. In my opinion, if you have the option. try to take 6A with Schriver. All my friends in Schriver including those that didn't have physics background were chilling the whole quarter and most of them still got solid As or higher while I worked my ass off and still couldn't get the A. In fact, I think I barely clutched my A- to be honest. If you're comfortable with physics though then I don't see any harm in taking it with Koutroulakis but if you're completely new (like me) really try to take 6A with Schriver if you want to keep your GPA as high as possible.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: B+
Dec. 18, 2016

Koutroulakis isn't a bad professor for physics. You could certainly get worse. He got frustrated with our class several times because nobody wanted to raise their hands to answer his questions and was obviously annoyed by how eager people were to leave at the end of lecture.

The material in the class isn't hard and even if you don't have any physics knowledge you can still do well. If you have studied physics in the past this class will be a breeze. Koutroulakis gives 2 midterms and they can be tricky at times. He puts multiple choice questions on his midterms and final which I found really annoying but I can see why he did it. I thought the final was a little easier than the midterms but I did dedicated a lot of time to studying for it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: N/A
Dec. 18, 2016

Koutroulakis was an engaging lecturer and pretty funny. He explained Physics well and I would definitely take him again. I don't like physics and didn't have a strong background going in, so this class wasn't my favorite, but he made it more bearable. Also, even though I didn't particularly like the material, his demonstrations made the class entertaining. The first midterm wasn't bad, if you studied and understood the concepts it was doable. The second midterm, in my opinion, wasn't much harder, but a lot of other people thought it was more challenging. The final was pretty hard. He said it would cover all material equally, but it focused a lot more on the end concepts, in my opinion. His curve is good though and it's not based on the average, it's predetermined and pretty generous. Also if you do the pre/post tests you get 0.5% extra credit. You can get another 0.5% extra credit if you use a clicker during lecture. Overall I recommend him.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: N/A
Dec. 9, 2016

I hate physics in general but Koutroulakis made it less painful by explaining things in a way that made sense. He was funny too and would do experiments in class to keep us engaged. Discussion isn't mandatory and lectures aren't podcasted. His tests are fair and usually combine conceptual multiple choice problems and then a few regular problems. I would take the whole 6 series with him if I could!

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: N/A
Sept. 28, 2016

Selling the three textbooks you need for the Physics 6 series, the UCLA store sells the bundle for $177 but I'm selling for $100 and they're in mint condition! (no highlights, marking, rip tears, etc.) text me if interested **********

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-
March 18, 2016

Great lecturer. Explains topics in details and answers any question you have to the best of his ability. This was my first physics class ever and it wasn't that bad thanks to him. Midterms are only 50 minutes so time is an issue on those but there's plenty of time to complete the final.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2015
Grade: A
Feb. 25, 2016

My favorite professor from any pre-requisite for a life science major. Looking to crash his 6C class. Wasn't able to go to his office hours, but he was able to get every single topic across to a person who had a shitty physics experience in HS. People who say his accent is hard to understand are just bitter lol it is NOTICEABLE that he is not from here, but it has NEVER resulted in me, at least, trying to decipher wtf he was trying to say. I read the book a lot and took it with an easier schedule though, so I lucked out. His homework was due on Friday nights so SET A REMINDER FOR THAT. 6A, by virtue of being the first university physics class, is challenging, so you will probably have to study 2 hours per week. Go to his physics discussions (which aren't mandatory) if you have a question. Cannot stress enough; don't be afraid to take him!!!!

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2015
Grade: A
Feb. 14, 2016

I personally liked him a lot for 6A. His lectures were clear and always funny. I didn't think anything too unexpected was on the tests. They were a time crunch, but sometimes he even reused questions we saw before. I'm taking him again for 6C for sure

Helpful?

5 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2015
Grade: B
Feb. 6, 2016

Stay away from this class if you are hoping for A in physics 6A. His first midterm and final were ridiculously hard and long, compared to 50 mins allowed, no matter how hard you study for it. Second midterm was ok! I spent all my time studying for his class and doing all the homework and ended up with B. He will tell you the exams are like his slides and the homework assigned, and yeah the multiple choice questions focuses on his quiz questions in the slides but good luck with the rest of the big problems! Hated all the physics because of this guy!

Helpful?

0 2 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 2
3.6
Overall Rating
Based on 12 Users
Easiness 2.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.9 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (10)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (8)
  • Often Funny
    (8)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (6)
  • Needs Textbook
    (6)
  • Tough Tests
    (8)
  • Would Take Again
    (7)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (6)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (5)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!