Professor

Gabriela Kovacova

AD
3.2
Overall Ratings
Based on 12 Users
Easiness 2.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 3.1 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 3.1 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (12)

1 of 2
1 of 2
Add your review...
Jan. 4, 2024
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A-

I think the professor is AMAZING. I really loved her and honestly I think she is one of the two best math professors I had so far. She was very kind, sweet, helpful, patient, and communicative, and her lectures were engaging and clear. Her office hours were very helpful as well.

BUT, I think the grading is kinda problematic. I had almost full scores for the quizzes and homework assignments, and had over 90% for my final, but still got an A-. My overall score was above 93 but still didn't receive an A?? It is my first time to see a math class that you couldn't get an A with an overall grade above 93. I paid so much effort throughout the whole quarter and did kinda well in everything I think, so I feel kinda unfair and sad. I have no idea why she curved our grades down/ move the cutoff up??

Anyway, overall I still think she is an extremely great professor and it was my great pleasure to take this class with her. She made it fun, enjoyable and manageable as it supposed to be a not-that-easy class. I appreciate it. But I think receiving an A depends on luck somehow even though you paid great effort and did well.

Helpful?

1 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
June 6, 2024
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: N/A

Professor Kovacova is very nice! She offers very organized lecture notes and explains them in detail in class. Her homework assignments serve as good practice for better understanding the concepts and preparing for the exams. Usually, she provides 5 questions each week, and we choose 2 of them to complete and upload. Nevertheless, homework only accounts for 10% of the grade (even though it should be graded based on completion), and the majority of the score depends on the 2 midterms and 1 final. The tests are straightforward and are similar to the homework questions, but currently, the midterms are out of 22 or 26 points, so even if you only got a few points deducted, the percentage decreases quickly. Not sure how the final grade will turn out, but I think taking the course with Professor Kovacova is still a very good experience! Another slight note is that she offers limited office hours (2 hours on odd weeks and 1 hour on even weeks) and didn't really accommodate when I said I have another class that requires attendance during her office hour time.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
April 6, 2024
Quarter: Winter 2024
Grade: A

She is amazing! I agree that this class is kinda difficult, but that's not her problem. She tries her best to make sure we all understand the content. She constantly stops in class and asks: am I clear or have I lost you completely? The exams and homework are strictly content from class, but sometimes much much more tedious and long, but her grading is lenient.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Jan. 14, 2024
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: B-

Professor Kovacova is a super sweet professor that tries her damn best to accommodate to the needs and questions of her class. She knows her material well, is confident, and I found her to be an extremely engaging lecturer. Her homeworks are not difficult as long as you go to the office hours and ask questions for hints... some people said the homeworks were difficult but I didn't think so. The only thing she has to improve on, which I believe she will because Fall 2023 was I believe her first time teaching, is that her tests are very difficult. Most of the tests will have 1-2 problems that can't be solved by the average math student within the time given (they're like hard-ish homework problems that maybe take 20 min per question?). I get that she's trying to differentiate students, but that kind of flings a lot of hardworking students into low Bs and Cs if they can't crack that one problem (I'll self admit I couldn't do those questions), and she doesn't really curve. But I do think that you'll actually walk away educated and confident in the course material after you take her class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Dec. 31, 2023
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A-

One of the best professors I have had. I think the first few reviews are from the same person raging at doing poorly so don't be misled by her low average here. She is an excellent instructor. Her grading is very reasonable in my opinion. She has two grading schemes, drops homework and a quiz, allows cheat cheats, and the final was very friendly in my opinion. Would take a course with her again happily.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Dec. 30, 2023
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A

Great prof. Fantastic lecturer: always checking for understanding, will answer all questions with a lot of patience even if its kind of stupid question, very clear. She posts lecture notes on BruinLearn so I was fine skipping a few lectures. Sufficient office hours. Homework was reasonable and doable, office hours helpful. Biweekly quizzes which were also super doable and helpful for incentivizing you to keep up with the class. People were critical of the lack of curve but tbh that's just the UCLA math dept for you lol

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Dec. 21, 2023
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: N/A

I think the positive reviews are from lucky students or the professor. She is not bad at teaching but the level of difficulty in homework and class material is not close to that on midterms or final and even some quizzes are hard. A lot of people expected a curve and there was none. The few people who got an A- are defending her but most people got in C and B range. Her grading is quite harsh.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Dec. 21, 2023
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: N/A

tough; bad at negotiate grade

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Dec. 21, 2023
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: NR

tough exams, curve up grades. you will not learn what you expected and get the grades you expected

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
June 19, 2024
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: A

Not bad class and fairly good follow up on 174E as per material.
There shouldn't be much to wrong. However, she did make it confusing a bit.
She didn't curve at all, tests were ok. The TA (Chu, R) was super harsh with grading. Basically no partial credit and harsh/stupid grading, the average grade I think was B-/C+ and she didn't curve at all. He (TA) I think also likes to discourage regrades (and ignores some), and did end up lowering some scores for my peers after initially increasing them (absurd). In terms of this, super unaccommodating and not understanding, definitely one of the worse ones I've had.
Homeworks were just 1 question out of a selection, though the HW didn't make a large portion of the grading.
It's definitely more interesting and useful than 174E as we use more math. We learn Brownian motion/Weiner process, dynamics (diff eq), Black Scholes Model (the actual PDE and it's applications/proof), option greeks, volatility, Monte Carlo, Value at Risk, portifolio optimization and CAPM model. The CAPM wasn't tested on the final since she was out of town, but we still learnt it by Dr. Voss and it seemed useful.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MATH 164
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A-
Jan. 4, 2024

I think the professor is AMAZING. I really loved her and honestly I think she is one of the two best math professors I had so far. She was very kind, sweet, helpful, patient, and communicative, and her lectures were engaging and clear. Her office hours were very helpful as well.

BUT, I think the grading is kinda problematic. I had almost full scores for the quizzes and homework assignments, and had over 90% for my final, but still got an A-. My overall score was above 93 but still didn't receive an A?? It is my first time to see a math class that you couldn't get an A with an overall grade above 93. I paid so much effort throughout the whole quarter and did kinda well in everything I think, so I feel kinda unfair and sad. I have no idea why she curved our grades down/ move the cutoff up??

Anyway, overall I still think she is an extremely great professor and it was my great pleasure to take this class with her. She made it fun, enjoyable and manageable as it supposed to be a not-that-easy class. I appreciate it. But I think receiving an A depends on luck somehow even though you paid great effort and did well.

Helpful?

1 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
MATH 164
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: N/A
June 6, 2024

Professor Kovacova is very nice! She offers very organized lecture notes and explains them in detail in class. Her homework assignments serve as good practice for better understanding the concepts and preparing for the exams. Usually, she provides 5 questions each week, and we choose 2 of them to complete and upload. Nevertheless, homework only accounts for 10% of the grade (even though it should be graded based on completion), and the majority of the score depends on the 2 midterms and 1 final. The tests are straightforward and are similar to the homework questions, but currently, the midterms are out of 22 or 26 points, so even if you only got a few points deducted, the percentage decreases quickly. Not sure how the final grade will turn out, but I think taking the course with Professor Kovacova is still a very good experience! Another slight note is that she offers limited office hours (2 hours on odd weeks and 1 hour on even weeks) and didn't really accommodate when I said I have another class that requires attendance during her office hour time.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MATH 164
Quarter: Winter 2024
Grade: A
April 6, 2024

She is amazing! I agree that this class is kinda difficult, but that's not her problem. She tries her best to make sure we all understand the content. She constantly stops in class and asks: am I clear or have I lost you completely? The exams and homework are strictly content from class, but sometimes much much more tedious and long, but her grading is lenient.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MATH 164
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: B-
Jan. 14, 2024

Professor Kovacova is a super sweet professor that tries her damn best to accommodate to the needs and questions of her class. She knows her material well, is confident, and I found her to be an extremely engaging lecturer. Her homeworks are not difficult as long as you go to the office hours and ask questions for hints... some people said the homeworks were difficult but I didn't think so. The only thing she has to improve on, which I believe she will because Fall 2023 was I believe her first time teaching, is that her tests are very difficult. Most of the tests will have 1-2 problems that can't be solved by the average math student within the time given (they're like hard-ish homework problems that maybe take 20 min per question?). I get that she's trying to differentiate students, but that kind of flings a lot of hardworking students into low Bs and Cs if they can't crack that one problem (I'll self admit I couldn't do those questions), and she doesn't really curve. But I do think that you'll actually walk away educated and confident in the course material after you take her class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MATH 164
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A-
Dec. 31, 2023

One of the best professors I have had. I think the first few reviews are from the same person raging at doing poorly so don't be misled by her low average here. She is an excellent instructor. Her grading is very reasonable in my opinion. She has two grading schemes, drops homework and a quiz, allows cheat cheats, and the final was very friendly in my opinion. Would take a course with her again happily.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MATH 164
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A
Dec. 30, 2023

Great prof. Fantastic lecturer: always checking for understanding, will answer all questions with a lot of patience even if its kind of stupid question, very clear. She posts lecture notes on BruinLearn so I was fine skipping a few lectures. Sufficient office hours. Homework was reasonable and doable, office hours helpful. Biweekly quizzes which were also super doable and helpful for incentivizing you to keep up with the class. People were critical of the lack of curve but tbh that's just the UCLA math dept for you lol

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MATH 164
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: N/A
Dec. 21, 2023

I think the positive reviews are from lucky students or the professor. She is not bad at teaching but the level of difficulty in homework and class material is not close to that on midterms or final and even some quizzes are hard. A lot of people expected a curve and there was none. The few people who got an A- are defending her but most people got in C and B range. Her grading is quite harsh.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MATH 164
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: N/A
Dec. 21, 2023

tough; bad at negotiate grade

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MATH 164
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: NR
Dec. 21, 2023

tough exams, curve up grades. you will not learn what you expected and get the grades you expected

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
MATH 179
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: A
June 19, 2024

Not bad class and fairly good follow up on 174E as per material.
There shouldn't be much to wrong. However, she did make it confusing a bit.
She didn't curve at all, tests were ok. The TA (Chu, R) was super harsh with grading. Basically no partial credit and harsh/stupid grading, the average grade I think was B-/C+ and she didn't curve at all. He (TA) I think also likes to discourage regrades (and ignores some), and did end up lowering some scores for my peers after initially increasing them (absurd). In terms of this, super unaccommodating and not understanding, definitely one of the worse ones I've had.
Homeworks were just 1 question out of a selection, though the HW didn't make a large portion of the grading.
It's definitely more interesting and useful than 174E as we use more math. We learn Brownian motion/Weiner process, dynamics (diff eq), Black Scholes Model (the actual PDE and it's applications/proof), option greeks, volatility, Monte Carlo, Value at Risk, portifolio optimization and CAPM model. The CAPM wasn't tested on the final since she was out of town, but we still learnt it by Dr. Voss and it seemed useful.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 2
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!