Professor
Gabriela Kovacova
1 of 1
Most Helpful Review
Winter 2024 - She is amazing! I agree that this class is kinda difficult, but that's not her problem. She tries her best to make sure we all understand the content. She constantly stops in class and asks: am I clear or have I lost you completely? The exams and homework are strictly content from class, but sometimes much much more tedious and long, but her grading is lenient.
Winter 2024 - She is amazing! I agree that this class is kinda difficult, but that's not her problem. She tries her best to make sure we all understand the content. She constantly stops in class and asks: am I clear or have I lost you completely? The exams and homework are strictly content from class, but sometimes much much more tedious and long, but her grading is lenient.
AD
Most Helpful Review
Spring 2024 - Not bad class and fairly good follow up on 174E as per material. There shouldn't be much to wrong. However, she did make it confusing a bit. She didn't curve at all, tests were ok. The TA (Chu, R) was super harsh with grading. Basically no partial credit and harsh/stupid grading, the average grade I think was B-/C+ and she didn't curve at all. He (TA) I think also likes to discourage regrades (and ignores some), and did end up lowering some scores for my peers after initially increasing them (absurd). In terms of this, super unaccommodating and not understanding, definitely one of the worse ones I've had. Homeworks were just 1 question out of a selection, though the HW didn't make a large portion of the grading. It's definitely more interesting and useful than 174E as we use more math. We learn Brownian motion/Weiner process, dynamics (diff eq), Black Scholes Model (the actual PDE and it's applications/proof), option greeks, volatility, Monte Carlo, Value at Risk, portifolio optimization and CAPM model. The CAPM wasn't tested on the final since she was out of town, but we still learnt it by Dr. Voss and it seemed useful.
Spring 2024 - Not bad class and fairly good follow up on 174E as per material. There shouldn't be much to wrong. However, she did make it confusing a bit. She didn't curve at all, tests were ok. The TA (Chu, R) was super harsh with grading. Basically no partial credit and harsh/stupid grading, the average grade I think was B-/C+ and she didn't curve at all. He (TA) I think also likes to discourage regrades (and ignores some), and did end up lowering some scores for my peers after initially increasing them (absurd). In terms of this, super unaccommodating and not understanding, definitely one of the worse ones I've had. Homeworks were just 1 question out of a selection, though the HW didn't make a large portion of the grading. It's definitely more interesting and useful than 174E as we use more math. We learn Brownian motion/Weiner process, dynamics (diff eq), Black Scholes Model (the actual PDE and it's applications/proof), option greeks, volatility, Monte Carlo, Value at Risk, portifolio optimization and CAPM model. The CAPM wasn't tested on the final since she was out of town, but we still learnt it by Dr. Voss and it seemed useful.
1 of 1
