Fernando Gomez-Pinilla
Department of Physiological Science
AD
3.1
Overall Rating
Based on 18 Users
Easiness 2.9 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.9 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.5 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
41.7%
34.7%
27.8%
20.8%
13.9%
6.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

37.8%
31.5%
25.2%
18.9%
12.6%
6.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

46.5%
38.7%
31.0%
23.2%
15.5%
7.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

29.2%
24.4%
19.5%
14.6%
9.7%
4.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

29.4%
24.5%
19.6%
14.7%
9.8%
4.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

29.6%
24.7%
19.8%
14.8%
9.9%
4.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

36.2%
30.2%
24.1%
18.1%
12.1%
6.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

35.3%
29.4%
23.5%
17.6%
11.8%
5.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

44.0%
36.7%
29.3%
22.0%
14.7%
7.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

36.4%
30.3%
24.2%
18.2%
12.1%
6.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

32.1%
26.8%
21.4%
16.1%
10.7%
5.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

34.6%
28.8%
23.1%
17.3%
11.5%
5.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (11)

2 of 2
2 of 2
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Jan. 6, 2012

I agree mostly with the previous reviews. The class seems very interesting and easy, but the professor really sucks the fun out of it. He is extremely monotoned, has a thick accent, and just reads off the ppt slides. He looks for very specific answers in his quizzes/midterm/final. He does not look like he is happy to be there and seems like he is really disappointed in his students all the time lol.

One nice thing about the class is that it is curved. It's hard to figure out what grade you will end up with, because it took him forever to grade our presentations (which we never found out the grades for). I just know that I ended up with a pretty decent grade even though I was expecting to barely pass.

I also did an honors contract with him and got an A. He is pretty lenient on grading, and is more concerned about your interest in the topic than the paper itself.

Overall, I would recommend the class because the material is useful for medical school and other health professions. But if you want to really learn you should learn more on your own, because you will not get much out of his lectures.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Jan. 6, 2012

I agree mostly with the previous reviews. The class seems very interesting and easy, but the professor really sucks the fun out of it. He is extremely monotoned, has a thick accent, and just reads off the ppt slides. He looks for very specific answers in his quizzes/midterm/final. He does not look like he is happy to be there and seems like he is really disappointed in his students all the time lol.

One nice thing about the class is that it is curved. It's hard to figure out what grade you will end up with, because it took him forever to grade our presentations (which we never found out the grades for). I just know that I ended up with a pretty decent grade even though I was expecting to barely pass.

I also did an honors contract with him and got an A. He is pretty lenient on grading, and is more concerned about your interest in the topic than the paper itself.

Overall, I would recommend the class because the material is useful for medical school and other health professions. But if you want to really learn you should learn more on your own, because you will not get much out of his lectures.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
2 of 2
3.1
Overall Rating
Based on 18 Users
Easiness 2.9 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.9 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.5 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Report Review

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!