- Home
- Search
- Elizabeth O'Brien
- HIST 3D
AD
Based on 2 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides
- Would Take Again
There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
This was an amazing class!!! Definitely take it! This class is extremely easy! No exams! (The final was a 3 page reflection about the class, what you learned and focusing on one of the aspects of a historian and choosing one weekly assignment and Perusall reading to help explain it.)The weekly homework was to do some readings on Persuall, make a comment and respond to another comment. There were also weekly "Portfolio Assignments" the assignments varied but all were extremely easy (Venn diagrams, analyzing a news article, doing some drawing, watching video and answering some questions) these assignments definitely do not take long to complete. There was also one TA for everyone and she was super sweet and helpful if you reached out. I was not able to enter the class on my first or second pass so I reached out to the professor to see if she could give me a PTE number and she gladly responded that she would be more than able to. I also had some trouble attending my assigned discussion section but they allowed me to attend the one that fit with my schedule since we all had the same TA. This class offers so much flexibility and they are both super understanding. She is an amaing professor and even though I am a Sociology major, given that the contest was focused on the history of certain science events, the content was interesting and I loved learning about every single topic. This class counts as a GE and you will not regret it!
About the coursework/graded assignments: Homework each week included leaving 2 comments on each reading posted (I skimmed through a lot of the readings and I probably dedicated around 1.5 hours per week for it). We also had short activities due at our discussion sections (creating venn diagrams, writing short responses to videos/texts, annotating articles) which took 15-30 minutes each week. At the end of the course, we also had to write a 3 page essay about how one of our historian skills have improved due to this course. The final is just sharing the activities we did throughout the quarter and the 3 page essay with our peers. Overall, the workload is extremely light and manageable and if you try, it is impossible to not get an A.
-
About the course material: Each week we covered a different topic: pre-modern medicine, slavery and medicine, germ theory, eugenics, the Flexner report, the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments, the Civil Rights Movement, The Cold War, Schizophrenia and homosexuality, ongoing healthcare disparities. All of the things we covered were genuinely interesting (and I’m not a STEM major) and changed my perspective on medicine greatly. I truly believe this class holds immense value, particularly to those looking to go into healthcare as you can really see how history has created health disparities that may not be obvious otherwise (just google race correction). No textbooks required.
-
Lectures and Discussion: Attendance was mandatory in both and the professor used Arkaive to track attendance. However, the things we learned in lecture are not used in any of the graded assignments as the professor wanted us to learn and enjoy the topics.
-
About the professor: Professor O’Brien was genuinely one of my favorite professors at UCLA so far. She has a clear passion for what she is teaching and is always excited to answer questions and discuss with her students. She is also one of those professors who wants to reward students for their efforts and wants to give her students As. You can also tell that she dedicates a lot of her time to the course (reading and responding to a lot of student’s comments on the homework despite not really having to).
-
About the TA: Meg was the TA for all the discussion sections and I believe the professor has repeatedly kept her as TA in the past. She was good at facilitating discussion and creating a comfortable atmosphere (I’ve had other TAs make discussion a little awkward sometimes and uncomfortable to participate, but this wasn’t the case). She was also the person who grades the weekly activities and checks to make sure they are correct (99% of the time gives green check mark which means 100% or gives clear feedback of what your missing and allows you to fix them).
-
Overall, I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS CLASS, THIS PROFESSOR, and THIS TA!!
This was an amazing class!!! Definitely take it! This class is extremely easy! No exams! (The final was a 3 page reflection about the class, what you learned and focusing on one of the aspects of a historian and choosing one weekly assignment and Perusall reading to help explain it.)The weekly homework was to do some readings on Persuall, make a comment and respond to another comment. There were also weekly "Portfolio Assignments" the assignments varied but all were extremely easy (Venn diagrams, analyzing a news article, doing some drawing, watching video and answering some questions) these assignments definitely do not take long to complete. There was also one TA for everyone and she was super sweet and helpful if you reached out. I was not able to enter the class on my first or second pass so I reached out to the professor to see if she could give me a PTE number and she gladly responded that she would be more than able to. I also had some trouble attending my assigned discussion section but they allowed me to attend the one that fit with my schedule since we all had the same TA. This class offers so much flexibility and they are both super understanding. She is an amaing professor and even though I am a Sociology major, given that the contest was focused on the history of certain science events, the content was interesting and I loved learning about every single topic. This class counts as a GE and you will not regret it!
About the coursework/graded assignments: Homework each week included leaving 2 comments on each reading posted (I skimmed through a lot of the readings and I probably dedicated around 1.5 hours per week for it). We also had short activities due at our discussion sections (creating venn diagrams, writing short responses to videos/texts, annotating articles) which took 15-30 minutes each week. At the end of the course, we also had to write a 3 page essay about how one of our historian skills have improved due to this course. The final is just sharing the activities we did throughout the quarter and the 3 page essay with our peers. Overall, the workload is extremely light and manageable and if you try, it is impossible to not get an A.
-
About the course material: Each week we covered a different topic: pre-modern medicine, slavery and medicine, germ theory, eugenics, the Flexner report, the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments, the Civil Rights Movement, The Cold War, Schizophrenia and homosexuality, ongoing healthcare disparities. All of the things we covered were genuinely interesting (and I’m not a STEM major) and changed my perspective on medicine greatly. I truly believe this class holds immense value, particularly to those looking to go into healthcare as you can really see how history has created health disparities that may not be obvious otherwise (just google race correction). No textbooks required.
-
Lectures and Discussion: Attendance was mandatory in both and the professor used Arkaive to track attendance. However, the things we learned in lecture are not used in any of the graded assignments as the professor wanted us to learn and enjoy the topics.
-
About the professor: Professor O’Brien was genuinely one of my favorite professors at UCLA so far. She has a clear passion for what she is teaching and is always excited to answer questions and discuss with her students. She is also one of those professors who wants to reward students for their efforts and wants to give her students As. You can also tell that she dedicates a lot of her time to the course (reading and responding to a lot of student’s comments on the homework despite not really having to).
-
About the TA: Meg was the TA for all the discussion sections and I believe the professor has repeatedly kept her as TA in the past. She was good at facilitating discussion and creating a comfortable atmosphere (I’ve had other TAs make discussion a little awkward sometimes and uncomfortable to participate, but this wasn’t the case). She was also the person who grades the weekly activities and checks to make sure they are correct (99% of the time gives green check mark which means 100% or gives clear feedback of what your missing and allows you to fix them).
-
Overall, I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS CLASS, THIS PROFESSOR, and THIS TA!!
Based on 2 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides (2)
- Would Take Again (2)