- Home
- Search
- Diana Rigeur
- All Reviews
Diana Rigeur
AD
Based on 21 Users
Diana NEVER provided feedback on assignments, nor did she respond to anybody’s messages on Canvas. If you’re actually looking for someone who will help you learn, you should skip this instructor. She gave everybody in a class of 20 students the exact same grade on two different papers. Is it possible that everyone performed the same? No way! Diana just didn’t feel like putting in the effort of actually grading the work. And it shows. During lecture, she just reads the presenter notes and rushes through slides. My advice: save your $1000 and watch YouTube videos instead!
Overview: This class was a deep dive into research methods. It's great if you're interested or curious about getting into research. However, the content can be a bit overwhelming if you've never taken biology and/or learned about topics such as genetics. The content will vary since the instructor will bring in different researchers to talk every quarter, but generally speaking a knowledge in basic genetics will help. Content from LS 7A will help too, since there is some overlap. Prof Ira Clark also went over the Biomed Research minor on week 6.
Structure: The instructor will bring in a researcher to talk about their research, and the instructor will break it down over the next 5 weeks (during which you'll hand in some reports). On week 6, the cycle starts anew and another researcher will come in (but this time it'll be easier since you will have gone through a lot of overlapping research techniques and terminology from the first researcher). For each researcher, there will be an initial report (50 pts), a problem set (100 pts), and a final report (100pts). Participation counts (10 pts per week), totaling 600 pts. There wasn't any extra credit but Prof Rigueur is very light on grading. She's more interested in you working through what you've learned rather than getting everything right.
The instructor: Prof Rigueur is a very enthusiastic lecturer. She was flexible with students during the pandemic, and light on grading. Lectures were recorded and posted on CCLE. She encouraged discussions through the forum and made a point in thoroughly answering every student's questions (there were many). Grading took some time, though (partly because of some technical error on Turnitin). Overall, I recommend this class if you're interested in research.
Really amazing professor, and really nice overall. She takes soooooo much time out of her own schedule to talk to everyone individually, and always answers questions. Can spend too much time on questions sometimes, which takes away from the bigger picture, but otherwise is really good. Explains everything really well, and really nicely. Makes more complex topics easier to comprehend. Doesn't really seem to have a temper, nor look down upon people for having "stupid questions"; she's very encouraging and understanding. Also, a pretty easy grader.
This class was is not an easy one but Dr. Rigueur made it so easy. She is amazing and you won’t regret taking the class with her
Dr. Rigueur is by far my favorite professor at UCLA thus far! To cut this into a short review ill breakdown pros and cons very simply below... keeping in mind this class was amazing.
Pros:
- Very approachable professor
- Lectures were so interesting and engaging
- Lectures were bruin cast and saved to view later
- Canvas was pretty organized
- Content was difficult but was not memorization, content was applicable and real world
- Her Test questions came DIRECTLY from the lecture slides, scientific papers and recorded lectures... the questions many times are to asses if you understood what she lectured on with a minor twist
- short answer and written portions where I got a majority of my points as they would give points for attempting to answer correctly
Cons:
- The tests were INTENSE (although I passed them)
- If you don't attend OH then don't expect much. OH is a huge source of help
- If you miss a lecture then expect your exam grade to drop at least 5-10%
- If you miss discussion you lose participation points
- MC portions of exams wrecked everyone LOL
All in all if I had to rate out of 10, I would give Dr. Rigueur a 9 out of 10! Take her class its far more digestible than any other professor in the MCDB department!
Lectures - majority of content on lecture slides will show up on the exams. The drawback is that there is a ton of content.
Content - I enjoyed the subject a lot and it was very interesting. It's actually heavy on genetics and seeing how gene expression controls cell diversity, leading to the complexity of development. Stem cells come up as well which is super interesting.
Discussion - Rachel was an amazing TA, but the way the discussion was set up, nobody ever really learned much from discussion. You have to read one full research paper before discussion, but the papers are often very long and complex so it wasn't possible to ever feel like you understood the paper. There's also a report due every week on each paper you read.
Professor - Dr. Rigueur offered plenty of OH and encouraged to ask questions, and she is overall very kind. Her lecture style was ok but sometimes she spoke extremely fast so laptops are good to take notes.
Midterms - Each midterm covered 5 lectures + 2-3 research papers covered in discussion. It's multiple choice, short response, and true/false. Most of the class had trouble with the multiple choice and you can lose quite a lot of points just by missing a couple. The short response has a lot of experimental questions, so it all depends on whether you understand the concepts. Average for the first midterm was around 70%, so I guess it's not that different from other MCDB classes.
Final - The final covered 8 lectures plus it was cumulative, and also covered the research papers covered in discussion....this was a lot of content. Luckily, she decided to make the final open notes/book/slides due to COVID-19. If this was not open notes, I would have 100% done very poorly. For the exams, no matter how early you study, it was really difficult to ever feel confident about the material due to the sheer volume of material.
Extra credit - she made clicker questions extra credit, so if you attend every lecture you'll get free extra credit points for just being there. she also had one extra credit question on every exam.
Tip - use OH and ask as many questions, and email the TAs with questions
Amazing professor and TAs
Selling Principles of Development Wolpert 6 edition pdf for $30. Text **********
I recently transferred here from a different university, and I have to say that Dr. Rigueur is the best professor for this class ever! She is extremely passionate about the subject which you can clearly see from her tone of voice. She also deeply cares about her student's success and their ability to learn -- she will spend much time with you 1-on-1 to help you understand the topic or help direct you to anything you might need. Her exams are fair and are what is supposed to be administered in a high-caliber university such as UCLA. I have seen this class be taught by other universities and other professors at UCLA, and honestly, Dr. Rigueur is overall the best despite her being the newest professor for the class. Her slides are a god-send and are extremely easy to follow. I personally loved the contrast in color in the text when discussing each slide. Some of the class is based on active learning as well, and she often will ask people to volunteer to answer some questions. Understanding the answers to those questions on a deeper level is what will get you an A. Not to mention that she is very FLEXIBLE! Other professors are very stern about timings etc., but honestly, Dr. Riguer really cares about the class and will adjust timings of quizzes/exams as needed. Overall, really recommend taking this class or other classes with her. She speaks extremely clearly, is very aware of her tone of voice when describing different topics, has a great and easy to approach personality and is overall an excellent teacher! 1000/10!
I took 5HA in the summer with professor Riguer. I enjoyed the class and it seemed like a pretty chill environment where I could learn very useful, practical information. She is super kind and caring and she likes to interact with her students which is admirable. She helped me when I felt stressed about the class and she would give me guidance on how to do good on her assignments. At one point, she held one-on-one appointments with her students, which I thought was very nice of her (during the meeting I found out she has a photographic memory which is pretty cool!). However, we got our grades back very late which, especially during summer, left us wondering what our grade was like towards the end. Overall, this class is great and Dr. Rigueur is a very caring professor
Diana NEVER provided feedback on assignments, nor did she respond to anybody’s messages on Canvas. If you’re actually looking for someone who will help you learn, you should skip this instructor. She gave everybody in a class of 20 students the exact same grade on two different papers. Is it possible that everyone performed the same? No way! Diana just didn’t feel like putting in the effort of actually grading the work. And it shows. During lecture, she just reads the presenter notes and rushes through slides. My advice: save your $1000 and watch YouTube videos instead!
Overview: This class was a deep dive into research methods. It's great if you're interested or curious about getting into research. However, the content can be a bit overwhelming if you've never taken biology and/or learned about topics such as genetics. The content will vary since the instructor will bring in different researchers to talk every quarter, but generally speaking a knowledge in basic genetics will help. Content from LS 7A will help too, since there is some overlap. Prof Ira Clark also went over the Biomed Research minor on week 6.
Structure: The instructor will bring in a researcher to talk about their research, and the instructor will break it down over the next 5 weeks (during which you'll hand in some reports). On week 6, the cycle starts anew and another researcher will come in (but this time it'll be easier since you will have gone through a lot of overlapping research techniques and terminology from the first researcher). For each researcher, there will be an initial report (50 pts), a problem set (100 pts), and a final report (100pts). Participation counts (10 pts per week), totaling 600 pts. There wasn't any extra credit but Prof Rigueur is very light on grading. She's more interested in you working through what you've learned rather than getting everything right.
The instructor: Prof Rigueur is a very enthusiastic lecturer. She was flexible with students during the pandemic, and light on grading. Lectures were recorded and posted on CCLE. She encouraged discussions through the forum and made a point in thoroughly answering every student's questions (there were many). Grading took some time, though (partly because of some technical error on Turnitin). Overall, I recommend this class if you're interested in research.
Really amazing professor, and really nice overall. She takes soooooo much time out of her own schedule to talk to everyone individually, and always answers questions. Can spend too much time on questions sometimes, which takes away from the bigger picture, but otherwise is really good. Explains everything really well, and really nicely. Makes more complex topics easier to comprehend. Doesn't really seem to have a temper, nor look down upon people for having "stupid questions"; she's very encouraging and understanding. Also, a pretty easy grader.
Dr. Rigueur is by far my favorite professor at UCLA thus far! To cut this into a short review ill breakdown pros and cons very simply below... keeping in mind this class was amazing.
Pros:
- Very approachable professor
- Lectures were so interesting and engaging
- Lectures were bruin cast and saved to view later
- Canvas was pretty organized
- Content was difficult but was not memorization, content was applicable and real world
- Her Test questions came DIRECTLY from the lecture slides, scientific papers and recorded lectures... the questions many times are to asses if you understood what she lectured on with a minor twist
- short answer and written portions where I got a majority of my points as they would give points for attempting to answer correctly
Cons:
- The tests were INTENSE (although I passed them)
- If you don't attend OH then don't expect much. OH is a huge source of help
- If you miss a lecture then expect your exam grade to drop at least 5-10%
- If you miss discussion you lose participation points
- MC portions of exams wrecked everyone LOL
All in all if I had to rate out of 10, I would give Dr. Rigueur a 9 out of 10! Take her class its far more digestible than any other professor in the MCDB department!
Lectures - majority of content on lecture slides will show up on the exams. The drawback is that there is a ton of content.
Content - I enjoyed the subject a lot and it was very interesting. It's actually heavy on genetics and seeing how gene expression controls cell diversity, leading to the complexity of development. Stem cells come up as well which is super interesting.
Discussion - Rachel was an amazing TA, but the way the discussion was set up, nobody ever really learned much from discussion. You have to read one full research paper before discussion, but the papers are often very long and complex so it wasn't possible to ever feel like you understood the paper. There's also a report due every week on each paper you read.
Professor - Dr. Rigueur offered plenty of OH and encouraged to ask questions, and she is overall very kind. Her lecture style was ok but sometimes she spoke extremely fast so laptops are good to take notes.
Midterms - Each midterm covered 5 lectures + 2-3 research papers covered in discussion. It's multiple choice, short response, and true/false. Most of the class had trouble with the multiple choice and you can lose quite a lot of points just by missing a couple. The short response has a lot of experimental questions, so it all depends on whether you understand the concepts. Average for the first midterm was around 70%, so I guess it's not that different from other MCDB classes.
Final - The final covered 8 lectures plus it was cumulative, and also covered the research papers covered in discussion....this was a lot of content. Luckily, she decided to make the final open notes/book/slides due to COVID-19. If this was not open notes, I would have 100% done very poorly. For the exams, no matter how early you study, it was really difficult to ever feel confident about the material due to the sheer volume of material.
Extra credit - she made clicker questions extra credit, so if you attend every lecture you'll get free extra credit points for just being there. she also had one extra credit question on every exam.
Tip - use OH and ask as many questions, and email the TAs with questions
I recently transferred here from a different university, and I have to say that Dr. Rigueur is the best professor for this class ever! She is extremely passionate about the subject which you can clearly see from her tone of voice. She also deeply cares about her student's success and their ability to learn -- she will spend much time with you 1-on-1 to help you understand the topic or help direct you to anything you might need. Her exams are fair and are what is supposed to be administered in a high-caliber university such as UCLA. I have seen this class be taught by other universities and other professors at UCLA, and honestly, Dr. Rigueur is overall the best despite her being the newest professor for the class. Her slides are a god-send and are extremely easy to follow. I personally loved the contrast in color in the text when discussing each slide. Some of the class is based on active learning as well, and she often will ask people to volunteer to answer some questions. Understanding the answers to those questions on a deeper level is what will get you an A. Not to mention that she is very FLEXIBLE! Other professors are very stern about timings etc., but honestly, Dr. Riguer really cares about the class and will adjust timings of quizzes/exams as needed. Overall, really recommend taking this class or other classes with her. She speaks extremely clearly, is very aware of her tone of voice when describing different topics, has a great and easy to approach personality and is overall an excellent teacher! 1000/10!
I took 5HA in the summer with professor Riguer. I enjoyed the class and it seemed like a pretty chill environment where I could learn very useful, practical information. She is super kind and caring and she likes to interact with her students which is admirable. She helped me when I felt stressed about the class and she would give me guidance on how to do good on her assignments. At one point, she held one-on-one appointments with her students, which I thought was very nice of her (during the meeting I found out she has a photographic memory which is pretty cool!). However, we got our grades back very late which, especially during summer, left us wondering what our grade was like towards the end. Overall, this class is great and Dr. Rigueur is a very caring professor