Deepak Rajagopal
Department of Environment
AD
2.9
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.6 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
31.1%
25.9%
20.7%
15.6%
10.4%
5.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

31.3%
26.0%
20.8%
15.6%
10.4%
5.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

38.7%
32.3%
25.8%
19.4%
12.9%
6.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

26.3%
21.9%
17.5%
13.2%
8.8%
4.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

27.3%
22.7%
18.2%
13.6%
9.1%
4.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

43.5%
36.2%
29.0%
21.7%
14.5%
7.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (5)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2022
Grade: B
May 25, 2022

I despised this class, I would highly advise to avoid taking it with Professor Rajagopal. The content could have been interesting and useful, especially if you are considering going into environmental consulting or related fields. However, the lectures were all over the place. The Professor was flat-out bad at explaining the content and often lost his track of thought. The homeworks were hard and graded harshly, so it sucked not learning anything in the class lectures. I ended up having to go to as many TA office hours as I could to understand the homework. Professor Rajagopal was not approachable or accommodating, and he criticized me several times in lecture which was super uncomfortable. I would not recommend this class.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2021
Grade: N/A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
June 18, 2021

He means well, but ultimately the lectures felt very disorganized. However, the topic of life cycle assessment itself is, as it seems, a difficult and hand-wavy topic to teach. It's very approximate and requires a lot of different averages and assumptions that don't necessarily reflect real life. A lot of accounting, basically. Professor Rajagopal is really helpful on the homework in office hours, but lecture concepts during lecture were really confusing. He also would change his mind about logistical things like the midterm and final, which was frustrating (like scheduling a final when there was none on the registrar, or changing the allotted time we could take our midterm from 8AM-11:59PM to 8AM-10:15AM).

The class was structured well, with five homeworks at the beginning of the quarter that took about 2-3 hours (or less) each (one per week), and then a group project that the latter half of the quarter focused on. I was blessed with a good group, so this was pretty smooth, but the topic itself wasn't very interesting.

Overall, I wouldn't take this class again.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2024
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
May 9, 2024

I enjoyed this class, the concepts presented on life-cycle assessment were super interesting and helpful, especially for job applications. In this class, we learned primarily about Process LCA and EIOLCA. We also learned about calculating present costs for cost-benefit analysis and sustainable business. I will warn that the the homework assignments are very quite time-consuming and somewhat tedious. The professor is clearly passionate about LCA, but I feel his lectures are somewhat disorganized. Tests are fair if you study and review the material taught in class. I would recommend taking it if you are interested in corporate sustainability. However, do not expect this to be an easy Environmental elective.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2024
Grade: A-
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Jan. 9, 2024

Overall I did actually like this class and Professor Rajagopal. There are a lot of harsh reviews on here but if LCA is something that you really are interested in then I recommend this class. I want to go into corporate sustainability so we were actually learning exactly the stuff that I hope to use later on. I was excited to be able to put LCA on my resume and Professor Rajagopal even gave me a recommendation for my application for an EPA Internship which I will be working at this summer. We got to know each other in Office Hours which I highly recommend going to because he will answer questions about the assignments. As a teacher, Rajagopal could be confusing, so I recommend reading the textbook because it will help you understand. He grossly overexplains some things and underexplains others. He spent a whole class basically teaching us unit conversion. Everyone was confused because they though it was some novel thing and didn't get it (yeah, the way he explained it was really bad), but I was just like y'all dw it's just unit conversion lmaoo.

Course setup: Weekly assignment, midterm, final.
The assignments could take a good bit of time. Average for me I would say was 3 hours, but the best was probably 1 and the worst 3 ish were probably closer to 6 7 8. But again, it was material I was interested in so I never dreaded doing them. I got As on all of them except for the first one I think. But I did work hard on them. Then I got like 88s ish or something on the tests, which are not curved.
Study for the tests by going through his slides. Literally just memorize his powerpoints and you'll be good.

I learned a lot in this class and I'm glad I took it and I would take it again. Start on the assignments early.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2017
Grade: B+
Oct. 29, 2018

One of the worst classes I have taken at UCLA. This is for my minor so if you are looking for an engaging environmental class, avoid at all costs. This class requires meticulous detail and tracing lifecycles back to coal production. The homework assignments are frustrating and take hours.

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2022
Grade: B
May 25, 2022

I despised this class, I would highly advise to avoid taking it with Professor Rajagopal. The content could have been interesting and useful, especially if you are considering going into environmental consulting or related fields. However, the lectures were all over the place. The Professor was flat-out bad at explaining the content and often lost his track of thought. The homeworks were hard and graded harshly, so it sucked not learning anything in the class lectures. I ended up having to go to as many TA office hours as I could to understand the homework. Professor Rajagopal was not approachable or accommodating, and he criticized me several times in lecture which was super uncomfortable. I would not recommend this class.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2021
Grade: N/A
June 18, 2021

He means well, but ultimately the lectures felt very disorganized. However, the topic of life cycle assessment itself is, as it seems, a difficult and hand-wavy topic to teach. It's very approximate and requires a lot of different averages and assumptions that don't necessarily reflect real life. A lot of accounting, basically. Professor Rajagopal is really helpful on the homework in office hours, but lecture concepts during lecture were really confusing. He also would change his mind about logistical things like the midterm and final, which was frustrating (like scheduling a final when there was none on the registrar, or changing the allotted time we could take our midterm from 8AM-11:59PM to 8AM-10:15AM).

The class was structured well, with five homeworks at the beginning of the quarter that took about 2-3 hours (or less) each (one per week), and then a group project that the latter half of the quarter focused on. I was blessed with a good group, so this was pretty smooth, but the topic itself wasn't very interesting.

Overall, I wouldn't take this class again.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2024
Grade: A
May 9, 2024

I enjoyed this class, the concepts presented on life-cycle assessment were super interesting and helpful, especially for job applications. In this class, we learned primarily about Process LCA and EIOLCA. We also learned about calculating present costs for cost-benefit analysis and sustainable business. I will warn that the the homework assignments are very quite time-consuming and somewhat tedious. The professor is clearly passionate about LCA, but I feel his lectures are somewhat disorganized. Tests are fair if you study and review the material taught in class. I would recommend taking it if you are interested in corporate sustainability. However, do not expect this to be an easy Environmental elective.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2024
Grade: A-
Jan. 9, 2024

Overall I did actually like this class and Professor Rajagopal. There are a lot of harsh reviews on here but if LCA is something that you really are interested in then I recommend this class. I want to go into corporate sustainability so we were actually learning exactly the stuff that I hope to use later on. I was excited to be able to put LCA on my resume and Professor Rajagopal even gave me a recommendation for my application for an EPA Internship which I will be working at this summer. We got to know each other in Office Hours which I highly recommend going to because he will answer questions about the assignments. As a teacher, Rajagopal could be confusing, so I recommend reading the textbook because it will help you understand. He grossly overexplains some things and underexplains others. He spent a whole class basically teaching us unit conversion. Everyone was confused because they though it was some novel thing and didn't get it (yeah, the way he explained it was really bad), but I was just like y'all dw it's just unit conversion lmaoo.

Course setup: Weekly assignment, midterm, final.
The assignments could take a good bit of time. Average for me I would say was 3 hours, but the best was probably 1 and the worst 3 ish were probably closer to 6 7 8. But again, it was material I was interested in so I never dreaded doing them. I got As on all of them except for the first one I think. But I did work hard on them. Then I got like 88s ish or something on the tests, which are not curved.
Study for the tests by going through his slides. Literally just memorize his powerpoints and you'll be good.

I learned a lot in this class and I'm glad I took it and I would take it again. Start on the assignments early.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2017
Grade: B+
Oct. 29, 2018

One of the worst classes I have taken at UCLA. This is for my minor so if you are looking for an engaging environmental class, avoid at all costs. This class requires meticulous detail and tracing lifecycles back to coal production. The homework assignments are frustrating and take hours.

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.9
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.6 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!