Deanna M. Needell
Department of Mathematics
AD
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 3.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
79.2%
66.0%
52.8%
39.6%
26.4%
13.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
July 1, 2024

Combinatorics does not come naturally to me and I found even the basics confusing. Things eventually clicked in how to recognize certain simpler distributions for the homework problems, but Professor Needell wasn't particularly helpful in this. I did not learn much in class, and I had to watch learn via looking up solutions. I have no idea how to recognize or the real world applications of half of the distributions we learned about (ex. Gamma, Chi-Square), which is disappointing since I know they are used quite extensively in multiple fields of study. There was a tedious-amount of homework, which I guess were helpful in tackling exam problems, since I did not learn much from lectures. I can't speak to how helpful she is outside of class (because I never figured out her office hours sign up). Her first two exams were relatively-easy in regard to the content we were learning, but the final was very hard. I was saved by the fact that it was multiple-choice and made very good educated guesses. In summary, I think that there must be better 170E professors than Needell, since I didn't learn much directly from her, but I don't think this class is necessarily that difficult.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: N/A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
June 22, 2024

Idk if the subject material was horrible or the professor is. I think it's both to be honest. Not the best lectures, and homework is the most tedious garbage you're forced to endure. Good luck.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: B
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
June 8, 2024

Terrible teacher -- some may even say dog water. Her teaching is equivalent to if Murr from Impractical Jokers had a bad punishment.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: A
July 1, 2024

Combinatorics does not come naturally to me and I found even the basics confusing. Things eventually clicked in how to recognize certain simpler distributions for the homework problems, but Professor Needell wasn't particularly helpful in this. I did not learn much in class, and I had to watch learn via looking up solutions. I have no idea how to recognize or the real world applications of half of the distributions we learned about (ex. Gamma, Chi-Square), which is disappointing since I know they are used quite extensively in multiple fields of study. There was a tedious-amount of homework, which I guess were helpful in tackling exam problems, since I did not learn much from lectures. I can't speak to how helpful she is outside of class (because I never figured out her office hours sign up). Her first two exams were relatively-easy in regard to the content we were learning, but the final was very hard. I was saved by the fact that it was multiple-choice and made very good educated guesses. In summary, I think that there must be better 170E professors than Needell, since I didn't learn much directly from her, but I don't think this class is necessarily that difficult.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: N/A
June 22, 2024

Idk if the subject material was horrible or the professor is. I think it's both to be honest. Not the best lectures, and homework is the most tedious garbage you're forced to endure. Good luck.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: B
June 8, 2024

Terrible teacher -- some may even say dog water. Her teaching is equivalent to if Murr from Impractical Jokers had a bad punishment.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 3.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!