Davida Michelle Johnson
Department of Engineering
AD
4.5
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 4.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 5.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Has Group Projects
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: A+
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
June 10, 2024

Agree with the other review that they don't teach technical skills, which was a bit of a disappointment for me. However I LOVED every other aspect of this class - if you are looking to gain experience in product development and business/startup skills take this class!!! It is kind of time consuming but I felt that it was worth it. They assigned teams, topics and coaches at the start and you work together to build your product up to demo day for the rest of the quarter. There are also a lot of guest speakers that you can definitely add to your network. I had an amazing group and a great coach, and this was a 10/10 experience.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: N/A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
June 8, 2024

I first heard about this class from one of the many fliers posted throughout Boelter Hall and Engineering V. It promised to teach ideas of AI and Software Design. This is not the case, and, in retrospect, I think that the fliers are quite misleading. This class does not teach you much of anything "technical." Its course description is far more accurate and honest. This class is about "soft skills": pitching, marketing, and design thinking. AI, software, programming, etc. is discussed but at such a high/surface level that it almost feels wishy-washy or lacking substance or just "Mickey Mouse," as they say. Therefore, do not join this class if you are hoping to learn, for example, how to actually implement AI technolgies, develop/program software, or handle database management. Instead, join this class if you want to think about similar, by certainly different ideas: using GenAI for ideation and discussing the ramifications of AI use; the design process (e.g. Figma) and UI/UX thinking that goes into an app prototype (before any programming); how to navigate the fine line between data privacy/security policy and getting the necessary data from a user, and how to incorporate good data practices in your design thinking.

If you are interested in this sorts of ideas (and having a cool opportunity to improve your soft skills), and not only wanting the underlying technical/hard skills, then consider taking this class. You will work with a group of other students and two or three professional coaches from industry--a cool experience, so long as your other team members hold their own.

The professors are great and the class is well organized, with many impressive guest lecturers. Demo Day was a fun experience too.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: A+
June 10, 2024

Agree with the other review that they don't teach technical skills, which was a bit of a disappointment for me. However I LOVED every other aspect of this class - if you are looking to gain experience in product development and business/startup skills take this class!!! It is kind of time consuming but I felt that it was worth it. They assigned teams, topics and coaches at the start and you work together to build your product up to demo day for the rest of the quarter. There are also a lot of guest speakers that you can definitely add to your network. I had an amazing group and a great coach, and this was a 10/10 experience.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2024
Grade: N/A
June 8, 2024

I first heard about this class from one of the many fliers posted throughout Boelter Hall and Engineering V. It promised to teach ideas of AI and Software Design. This is not the case, and, in retrospect, I think that the fliers are quite misleading. This class does not teach you much of anything "technical." Its course description is far more accurate and honest. This class is about "soft skills": pitching, marketing, and design thinking. AI, software, programming, etc. is discussed but at such a high/surface level that it almost feels wishy-washy or lacking substance or just "Mickey Mouse," as they say. Therefore, do not join this class if you are hoping to learn, for example, how to actually implement AI technolgies, develop/program software, or handle database management. Instead, join this class if you want to think about similar, by certainly different ideas: using GenAI for ideation and discussing the ramifications of AI use; the design process (e.g. Figma) and UI/UX thinking that goes into an app prototype (before any programming); how to navigate the fine line between data privacy/security policy and getting the necessary data from a user, and how to incorporate good data practices in your design thinking.

If you are interested in this sorts of ideas (and having a cool opportunity to improve your soft skills), and not only wanting the underlying technical/hard skills, then consider taking this class. You will work with a group of other students and two or three professional coaches from industry--a cool experience, so long as your other team members hold their own.

The professors are great and the class is well organized, with many impressive guest lecturers. Demo Day was a fun experience too.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.5
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 4.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 5.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Has Group Projects
    (2)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!