David B Cline
Department of Astronomy
AD
3.0
Overall Rating
Based on 10 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
34.3%
28.6%
22.9%
17.1%
11.4%
5.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (4)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 12, 2006

Well, I'm a North Campus major who took Cline's cosmology class after enjoying the easy but interesting Astro 3. It really was frustrating and not as good. I'm not an idiot with math, and the honors section with the TA gave me some really fascinating insight into the principles in support of relativity and stuff, but lectures had some major drawbacks, most of which have been stated by others. His notes are truly illegible, especially if your eyesight is a bit week. Also, he doesn't keep the overheads up long enough (like others said). The textbook is incredibly confusing... I actually enjoyed reading and learning from the Astro 3 book, but even by the end of the quarter I was barely getting used to the writing style in this one. Anyway, like others, I assumed I got a B or a C+, but ended up with an A+...presumably, he's really into grade inflation. I learned some interesting things, and it inspired me to read Scientific American and stuff, but it could have been taught so much better.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 27, 2006

Not a good lecturer. Lectures are boring and confusing. He doesn't have good communication skills. I do not recommend this professor. the textbook is not easy reading either. The material might have been interesting if taught differently. I thought the class was hard. However, the grading must be easy. I thought I was gettiing like a D, but I ended up with a B- somehow. He has lecture transperencies during his lectures, however, one cannot pay attention to what he is saying because you have to hurry up and copy down the notes since he rushes through them.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 14, 2005

If you have an interest in astronomy or cosmology at ALL, then do not take a class with Cline. He has no idea how to teach, and when he is able to make a coherent statement there's a decent chance that it will either be incorrect (e.g. galileo developed certain gravitational laws actually developed by Kepler, black holes are governed by relativity [we don't know what laws govern black holes], the center of the universe doesn't exist because of gravitational lensing [the reason is entirely different]), or he will later contradict it.

As someone said before, he cares only about his research, not getting any messages across to students. He is a particle physicist, not a cosmologist. His tests are worded terribly and confusing not because of difficult material, but because of a lack of understanding of the material and of the English language on his part. The practice sets have little (if anything) to do with what is taught in the class and what is on the tests. Yes, the class is relatively easy, but not worth the inanity of his lectures and tests. If you value knowledge, steer clear of Cline.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Feb. 20, 2002

Don't take him unless you are a South campus major. He expects everyone to have an extenive background in physics. His lectures are confusing and difficult to follow.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 12, 2006

Well, I'm a North Campus major who took Cline's cosmology class after enjoying the easy but interesting Astro 3. It really was frustrating and not as good. I'm not an idiot with math, and the honors section with the TA gave me some really fascinating insight into the principles in support of relativity and stuff, but lectures had some major drawbacks, most of which have been stated by others. His notes are truly illegible, especially if your eyesight is a bit week. Also, he doesn't keep the overheads up long enough (like others said). The textbook is incredibly confusing... I actually enjoyed reading and learning from the Astro 3 book, but even by the end of the quarter I was barely getting used to the writing style in this one. Anyway, like others, I assumed I got a B or a C+, but ended up with an A+...presumably, he's really into grade inflation. I learned some interesting things, and it inspired me to read Scientific American and stuff, but it could have been taught so much better.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 27, 2006

Not a good lecturer. Lectures are boring and confusing. He doesn't have good communication skills. I do not recommend this professor. the textbook is not easy reading either. The material might have been interesting if taught differently. I thought the class was hard. However, the grading must be easy. I thought I was gettiing like a D, but I ended up with a B- somehow. He has lecture transperencies during his lectures, however, one cannot pay attention to what he is saying because you have to hurry up and copy down the notes since he rushes through them.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 14, 2005

If you have an interest in astronomy or cosmology at ALL, then do not take a class with Cline. He has no idea how to teach, and when he is able to make a coherent statement there's a decent chance that it will either be incorrect (e.g. galileo developed certain gravitational laws actually developed by Kepler, black holes are governed by relativity [we don't know what laws govern black holes], the center of the universe doesn't exist because of gravitational lensing [the reason is entirely different]), or he will later contradict it.

As someone said before, he cares only about his research, not getting any messages across to students. He is a particle physicist, not a cosmologist. His tests are worded terribly and confusing not because of difficult material, but because of a lack of understanding of the material and of the English language on his part. The practice sets have little (if anything) to do with what is taught in the class and what is on the tests. Yes, the class is relatively easy, but not worth the inanity of his lectures and tests. If you value knowledge, steer clear of Cline.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Feb. 20, 2002

Don't take him unless you are a South campus major. He expects everyone to have an extenive background in physics. His lectures are confusing and difficult to follow.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.0
Overall Rating
Based on 10 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!