Daniel Williford
Department of English
AD
4.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 3.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.5 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Needs Textbook
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Snazzy Dresser
  • Often Funny
  • Would Take Again
  • Issues PTEs
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
39.3%
32.7%
26.2%
19.6%
13.1%
6.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

35.7%
29.8%
23.8%
17.9%
11.9%
6.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: N/A
June 10, 2017

I was so excited to take this class because I LOVE Oscar Wilde. However, it was not what I thought it would be. Although all of the readings were excellent, the lectures were not. The professor spent the entire 2 hours summarizing plot...which really was a waste of time because readings were done outside of the classroom. In addition, he requires you do weekly postings (800 words) which are way too long in my opinion. I would rather engage with the text in class than doing it online. He also really only looks for one specific way of thinking. If you even try and suggest an argument against his, he will put it down immediatley.
He was really funny though- great sense of humor and very witty. The class itself wasn't too hard. The midterm was very easy (passage IDs and silly multiple choice)....Overall, the readings were AMAZING, but the class itself? Ehhh

Helpful?

2 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: N/A
June 10, 2017

I was so excited to take this class because I LOVE Oscar Wilde. However, it was not what I thought it would be. Although all of the readings were excellent, the lectures were not. The professor spent the entire 2 hours summarizing plot...which really was a waste of time because readings were done outside of the classroom. In addition, he requires you do weekly postings (800 words) which are way too long in my opinion. I would rather engage with the text in class than doing it online. He also really only looks for one specific way of thinking. If you even try and suggest an argument against his, he will put it down immediatley.
He was really funny though- great sense of humor and very witty. The class itself wasn't too hard. The midterm was very easy (passage IDs and silly multiple choice)....Overall, the readings were AMAZING, but the class itself? Ehhh

Helpful?

2 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 3.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.5 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (2)
  • Needs Textbook
    (2)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (2)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (1)
  • Snazzy Dresser
    (2)
  • Often Funny
    (2)
  • Would Take Again
    (1)
  • Issues PTEs
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!