Professor

D Kim

AD
3.0
Overall Ratings
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 1.7 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 2.0 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 3.3 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Nov. 29, 2024
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: I

Dennis was not a helpful professor at all. He writes way too fast on the blackboard, and his writing is often incomprehensible. When asked a question, there's never a clear answer from him. He also tends to throw in a lot of terminology and theory that has not been introduced in lecture yet, confusing students out of their wits. His homework always contains at least one problem about something which has not been taught in class yet. He even recorded students taking the midterm exam without any form of written or verbal consent, to prevent cheating (is this even legal??). The midterm solutions were never comprehensive, would only contain answers without any proper working. The material itself felt like it was being taught in an extremely disorganized fashion, out of order. Several students and faculty alike were surprised at the fact that the concept of Laplace transforms was moved to the end of the course, which makes absolutely no sense given that they are critical for understanding the purpose of the transfer function and frequency response functions. The only saving grace for my interest in the course was the TAs and the Labs that involved using MATLAB. Overall, though I gained a minor interest in further studying the subject on my own, I did not gain an appreciation or flavor for the applications of these concepts in the real world at all through the course alone and was largely clueless. It is my sincere plea to the department to remove this lecturer and only have Dr M'Closkey teach this course.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Oct. 8, 2023
Quarter: Summer 2023
Grade: A

Great professor, not too sure why there aren't any reviews for him. I took him over summer so the course went by really fast but he honestly made it really manageable. Every lecture was clear and for what others say is one of the hardest undergraduate upper div in mechanical engineering, it was probably my favorite. That isn't to say his class was easy, the midterm and final average were in the mid 70's and low 60's respectively, but he obviously curved so it was nice. But the key to acing his exams is to just really understand the Hw and to do the practice problems he gives you.
Overall, I felt like I learned A LOT from him. If I were to take this class I would definitely take it with him again.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MECH&AE 107L
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
March 7, 2021
Quarter: Winter 2021
Grade: NR

This is a decent class that is taught well by Kim, but the material is just so challenging. Its a LOT of material that feels really rushed through at times, and requires a lot of outside study in order to fully understand it. Kim writes VERY quickly and it is a challenge to keep up and get all the information. The homework assignments are challenging but are the most important way to study and understand the material. The midterm was pretty rough because it relied on a lot of principles that weren't stressed in class (like principles from EE 100 or conceptual proofs we hadn't discussed). The lab sessions were kind of a joke because it would be a pre-written Matlab script where we had to change 3-4 lines and then upload a report with screenshots of the resulting plots. The TA you have for this can make or break your experience with the labs. Overall, a rough class but there is good support available.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MECH&AE 107
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: I
Nov. 29, 2024

Dennis was not a helpful professor at all. He writes way too fast on the blackboard, and his writing is often incomprehensible. When asked a question, there's never a clear answer from him. He also tends to throw in a lot of terminology and theory that has not been introduced in lecture yet, confusing students out of their wits. His homework always contains at least one problem about something which has not been taught in class yet. He even recorded students taking the midterm exam without any form of written or verbal consent, to prevent cheating (is this even legal??). The midterm solutions were never comprehensive, would only contain answers without any proper working. The material itself felt like it was being taught in an extremely disorganized fashion, out of order. Several students and faculty alike were surprised at the fact that the concept of Laplace transforms was moved to the end of the course, which makes absolutely no sense given that they are critical for understanding the purpose of the transfer function and frequency response functions. The only saving grace for my interest in the course was the TAs and the Labs that involved using MATLAB. Overall, though I gained a minor interest in further studying the subject on my own, I did not gain an appreciation or flavor for the applications of these concepts in the real world at all through the course alone and was largely clueless. It is my sincere plea to the department to remove this lecturer and only have Dr M'Closkey teach this course.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MECH&AE 107
Quarter: Summer 2023
Grade: A
Oct. 8, 2023

Great professor, not too sure why there aren't any reviews for him. I took him over summer so the course went by really fast but he honestly made it really manageable. Every lecture was clear and for what others say is one of the hardest undergraduate upper div in mechanical engineering, it was probably my favorite. That isn't to say his class was easy, the midterm and final average were in the mid 70's and low 60's respectively, but he obviously curved so it was nice. But the key to acing his exams is to just really understand the Hw and to do the practice problems he gives you.
Overall, I felt like I learned A LOT from him. If I were to take this class I would definitely take it with him again.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MECH&AE 107L
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Winter 2021
Grade: NR
March 7, 2021

This is a decent class that is taught well by Kim, but the material is just so challenging. Its a LOT of material that feels really rushed through at times, and requires a lot of outside study in order to fully understand it. Kim writes VERY quickly and it is a challenge to keep up and get all the information. The homework assignments are challenging but are the most important way to study and understand the material. The midterm was pretty rough because it relied on a lot of principles that weren't stressed in class (like principles from EE 100 or conceptual proofs we hadn't discussed). The lab sessions were kind of a joke because it would be a pre-written Matlab script where we had to change 3-4 lines and then upload a report with screenshots of the resulting plots. The TA you have for this can make or break your experience with the labs. Overall, a rough class but there is good support available.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!